Pravdivtseva Mariya S, Pravdivtsev Andrey N, Peters Sönke, Hensler Johannes, Larsen Naomi, Hövener Jan-Bernd, Jansen Olav, Wodarg Fritz
Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Section Biomedical Imaging, Molecular Imaging North Competence Center (MOIN CC), University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel University, Kiel, Germany.
Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel, Germany.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2025 Feb;31(1):49-56. doi: 10.1177/15910199221145985. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
Recently, a novel intrasaccular device (contour neurovascular system, contour) was introduced to treat intracranial aneurysms. Contour is placed at thе aneurysm neck and reduces the intraaneurysmal blood inflow. Contour comes in a range of sizes to target different aneurysms. The efficiency of altering flow with contour and the effect of device size have not yet been investigated. Therefore, we studied the effect of the device size with patient-based aneurysm models using 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA).
Three patient-based aneurysm models with necks ranging from 2.7 to 9.7 mm were produced, providing standardized testing conditions. Contours with diameters of 5, 11, and 14 mm were implanted into the models, four of each size. 2D DSA images were acquired before and after implanting contour (15 frames/s, manual contrast injection). After injecting angiographic contrast agent, the DSA signal was recorded over time to calculate the contrast washout time (WOT), which is a measure of flow diversion efficiency.
All contour devices caused contrast agent stasis and increased WOT in aneurysm sac (-value = 0.0005). The median relative WOT was largest for 5-mm contour (6.6 ± 3.2) and similar for 11-mm contour (3.4 ± 2.6) and 14-mm contour (3.2 ± 3.8). The implantation procedure might affect WOT values even for contours of the same size; the overall relative WOT ranged between 1.5 and 10.89.
The 5-mm contour showed the longest WOT value in our study, while no apparent difference between 11-mm contour and 14-mm contour was found.
最近,一种新型的囊内装置(轮廓神经血管系统,Contour)被引入用于治疗颅内动脉瘤。Contour放置在动脉瘤颈部,可减少动脉瘤内的血流。Contour有多种尺寸,以针对不同的动脉瘤。使用Contour改变血流的效率以及装置尺寸的影响尚未得到研究。因此,我们使用二维数字减影血管造影(DSA),基于患者的动脉瘤模型研究了装置尺寸的影响。
制作了三个颈部尺寸在2.7至9.7毫米之间的基于患者的动脉瘤模型,提供标准化测试条件。将直径为5、11和14毫米的Contour植入模型中,每种尺寸各四个。在植入Contour前后采集二维DSA图像(15帧/秒,手动注射造影剂)。注射血管造影剂后,随时间记录DSA信号以计算造影剂洗脱时间(WOT),这是衡量血流分流效率的指标。
所有Contour装置均导致造影剂滞留,并增加了动脉瘤囊内的WOT(P值 = 0.0005)。5毫米Contour的中位相对WOT最大(6.6 ± 3.2),11毫米Contour(3.4 ± 2.6)和14毫米Contour(3.2 ± 3.8)相似。即使对于相同尺寸的Contour,植入过程也可能影响WOT值;总体相对WOT在1.5至10.89之间。
在我们的研究中,5毫米Contour显示出最长的WOT值,而11毫米Contour和14毫米Contour之间未发现明显差异。