High-performance non-fullerene acceptor-analogues designed from dithienothiophen [3,2-b]-pyrrolobenzothiadiazole (TPBT) donor materials.

CONTEXT

Density functional theory (DFT) method was employed to investigate the electronic structure properties, excited state dynamics, charge transfer, and photovoltaic potential of benzo [1,2,5] thiadiazole fused to 3,7-dimethyl-3a,6,7,7b-tetrahydro-5H-thieno[2',3':4,5]thieno[3,2-b]pyrrole to form 3,9,12,13-tetramethyl-12,13-dihydro-[1,2,5]thiadiazolo[3,4-e]thieno[2″,3″:4,5]pyrrolo[3.2-g]thieno[2',3':4,5]thieno[3,2-b]indole as the acceptor (A), bridge with thiophene as π-spacer to the donor moieties (D) which are 2,3-dihydrobenzo [b]thiophene-6-carboxylic acid (M4) and functionalized R, M1, M2, M3, and M5 to give a D-π-A-π-D. Here is the reverse combination for our molecules: the A-π-D-π-A type of chromophore configuration. It is also observed that tuning the dono-bridge configuration significantly increases the ease of charge transfer as the energy gap decreases in the order of 1.29 eV in M4 < 1.59 eV in M3 < 1.67 eV < 1.99 in M2 and 2.06 eV. The reorganization energy (RE) of M3 (0.0031) and M5 (0.0031) indicates an increase in the order of M3 > M5 > R > M2 > M4 > M1. The HOMO-LUMO indicates that the reactivity decreased, while the stability increased for the reference R at 0.990 eV, compared to the designed molecules M1-M5, with M1 being the least stable at 0.970 eV, while M4 exhibited the highest stability at 1.550 eV. The stability of the designed molecule decreased in the order of M4:1.550 > M3:1.257 > M5:1.197 > M2:1.010 > M1:0.970. Therefore, all results point to the electron-deficient core as an effective end-capped electron acceptor in M1-M5 compounds. As the ideal pair for successfully optimizing optoelectronic properties by reducing the HOMO-LUMO energy levels, reorganization energy, and binding energy and enhancing the absorption maximum and open-circuit voltage values in these designed molecules.

METHODS

DFT and TDDFT calculations were performed with Gaussian 16 program. The modelled compounds were optimized fully using the CAM-B3LYP, WB97XD, B3LYP, and MPW1PW91 functionals with the 6-31 G (d,p) basis set. The graphs for the density of states were plotted using the PyMOlyze software. Other molecular properties like the transition density matrix (TDM) and electron density difference maps (EDD) were rendered via the Multiwfn software.