Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Dienogest Compared with Combined Oral Contraceptives after Surgery for Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the cost-effectiveness of different strategies, including the dienogest (DNG) and combined oral contraceptives (COC) therapy, for the prevention of endometriosis recurrence after surgery.

DESIGN

A decision tree model was created. The analysis was based on data from a healthcare provider in China. Model inputs were derived from published data. The end points included incremental cost effectiveness ratio, net monetary benefit (NMB), and incremental NMB associated with prevention of recurrence. The uncertainty was assessed through one way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist was used to assess quality of the reporting.

SETTING

China healthcare system.

PATIENTS

Individuals undergoing laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis.

INTERVENTIONS

DNG vs COC.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The base case analysis showed that hormone supression via DNG resulted in 0.7493 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of $1625.49 compared with COC, which resulted in 0.7346 QALYs at a cost of $343.61. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was $87 679.89 per additional QALY gained and the DNG treatment was associated with an incremental NMB of -$731.39. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that DNG is not cost-effective in most cases at a threshold consistent with World Health Organisation recommendations of $37 653/QALY.

CONCLUSION

The result of our present analysis suggests that the DNG might not be cost-effective for the prevention of endometriosis recurrence after surgery in China.