• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将电子患者报告结局测量工具嵌入 III 期黑色素瘤患者常规护理中(ePROMs-MEL):一项前瞻性、纵向、混合方法的初步研究方案。

Embedding electronic patient-reported outcome measures into routine care for patients with stage III MELanoma (ePROMs-MEL): protocol for a prospective, longitudinal, mixed-methods pilot study.

机构信息

NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;12(12):e066852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066852.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066852
PMID:36600423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9772660/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The benefits of patient-reported feedback, using questionnaires that allow patients to report how they feel and function without any interpretation from healthcare professionals, are well established. However, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are not routinely collected in patients with melanoma in Australia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of implementing electronic PROMs (ePROMs) into routine care from the perspectives of patients with stage III melanoma and their treating clinical team.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A minimum of 50 patients and 5 clinicians will be recruited to this prospective, longitudinal pilot study (ePROMs-MELanoma). The study uses a mixed-methods approach (quantitative PROMs questionnaires and end-of-study surveys with qualitative interviews) and commenced in May 2021 in surgical and medical melanoma clinics at two sites in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. The primary outcomes are measures of feasibility and acceptability, comprising descriptive questionnaire completion statistics, and proportion of patients who reported that these PROMs were easy to complete and measured items they considered important. Clinician and clinic staff views will be canvassed on the appropriateness of these PROMs for their patients, change in referral practice and uptake and incorporation into routine practice. Secondary aims include measurement of improvements in patients' emotional and physical health and well-being, and utility of real-time data capture and clinician feedback. All participants will complete the Distress Thermometer and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires in the clinic using a tablet computer at baseline and two to three subsequent follow-up appointments. Participants who report a score of 4 or higher on the Distress Thermometer will be triaged to complete an additional three questionnaires: the QLQ-C30, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale and Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire-28. Results will be generated in real time; patients with psychosocial distress or poor quality of life will discuss possible referral to appropriate allied health services with their clinician. Thematic analysis of interviews will be conducted.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval obtained from St Vincent's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee on 19 September 2019 (2019/ETH10558), with amendments approved on 8 June 2022. Patient consent is obtained electronically prior to questionnaire commencement. Dissemination strategies will include publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at international conferences, tailored presentations for clinical societies and government bodies, organisational reporting through multidisciplinary meetings and research symposia for local clinicians and clinic staff, and more informal, lay reports and presentations for consumer melanoma representative bodies and patient participants and their families.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12620001149954.

摘要

简介

患者报告反馈的益处已得到充分证实,使用允许患者报告自己感受和功能的问卷而无需医疗保健专业人员进行任何解释。然而,在澳大利亚,黑素瘤患者并未常规收集患者报告结局测量(PROMs)。本研究的目的是从 III 期黑素瘤患者及其治疗临床团队的角度评估电子 PROMs(ePROMs)纳入常规护理的可行性和可接受性。

方法和分析

本前瞻性纵向试点研究(ePROMs-MELanoma)将招募至少 50 名患者和 5 名临床医生。该研究采用混合方法(定量 PROMs 问卷和结束研究调查的定性访谈),于 2021 年 5 月在澳大利亚两个大都市悉尼的两个地点的外科和医学黑素瘤诊所开始。主要结局是可行性和可接受性的衡量标准,包括描述性问卷完成统计数据,以及报告这些 PROMs 易于完成和测量他们认为重要的项目的患者比例。将征求临床医生和诊所工作人员对这些 PROMs 适合他们的患者、转诊实践的变化以及纳入常规实践的看法。次要目标包括测量患者情绪和身心健康的改善,以及实时数据捕获和临床医生反馈的实用性。所有参与者将在基线时使用平板电脑在诊所完成焦虑自评量表、抑郁、焦虑和压力量表和黑素瘤担忧问卷-28 问卷调查,在两个至三个后续随访预约时完成 EQ-5D-5L 问卷。在 Distress Thermometer 上得分达到 4 或更高的参与者将被分诊完成另外三个问卷:QLQ-C30、抑郁、焦虑和压力量表和黑素瘤担忧问卷-28。结果将实时生成;有心理社会困扰或生活质量差的患者将与他们的临床医生讨论可能向适当的辅助健康服务转诊。将进行访谈的主题分析。

伦理与传播

圣文森特医院人类研究伦理委员会于 2019 年 9 月 19 日获得伦理批准(2019/ETH10558),并于 2022 年 6 月 8 日批准了修正案。在开始问卷调查之前,患者通过电子方式获得同意。传播策略将包括在同行评议的期刊上发表和在国际会议上展示,为临床学会和政府机构量身定制的演示,为当地临床医生和诊所工作人员举办多学科会议和研究研讨会,以及为消费者黑素瘤代表机构和患者参与者及其家属提供更非正式的、外行的报告和演示。

试验注册号

ACTRN12620001149954。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/9772660/acdf17f3ba4e/bmjopen-2022-066852f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/9772660/530d5dc148a8/bmjopen-2022-066852f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/9772660/acdf17f3ba4e/bmjopen-2022-066852f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/9772660/530d5dc148a8/bmjopen-2022-066852f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cac/9772660/acdf17f3ba4e/bmjopen-2022-066852f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Embedding electronic patient-reported outcome measures into routine care for patients with stage III MELanoma (ePROMs-MEL): protocol for a prospective, longitudinal, mixed-methods pilot study.将电子患者报告结局测量工具嵌入 III 期黑色素瘤患者常规护理中(ePROMs-MEL):一项前瞻性、纵向、混合方法的初步研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;12(12):e066852. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066852.
2
Improving the patient-centred care of children with life-altering skin conditions using feedback from electronic patient-reported outcome measures: protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study (PEDS-ePROM).利用电子患者报告结局测量结果反馈提高改变生命的皮肤状况儿童的以患者为中心的护理:混合有效性实施研究(PEDS-ePROM)方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 9;11(4):e041861. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041861.
3
Self-reported MeasUrement of Physical and PsychosOcial Symptoms Response Tool (SUPPORT-dialysis): systematic symptom assessment and management in patients on in-centre haemodialysis - a parallel arm, non-randomised feasibility pilot study protocol.自我报告的身体和心理社会症状反应工具测量(SUPPORT-dialysis):中心血液透析患者的系统症状评估和管理 - 一项平行臂、非随机可行性试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):e080712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080712.
4
Protocol for the implementation of a stepped-care model to address fear of cancer recurrence in patients previously diagnosed with early-stage (0-II) melanoma.实施阶梯式护理模式以解决先前被诊断为早期(0-II 期)黑色素瘤的患者对癌症复发恐惧的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 3;12(3):e054337. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054337.
5
Feasibility and acceptability of e-PROMs data capture and feedback among patients receiving haemodialysis in the Symptom monitoring WIth Feedback Trial (SWIFT) pilot: protocol for a qualitative study in Australia.在澳大利亚,一项名为“症状监测与反馈试验(SWIFT)”的试点研究中,针对接受血液透析治疗的患者,评估电子患者报告结局(e-PROMs)数据采集和反馈的可行性和可接受性:一项定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 6;10(11):e039014. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039014.
6
The Development and Feasibility of a Novel Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (Eproms) Questionnaire in patients with penile cancer.一种新型电子患者报告结局测量(Eproms)问卷在阴茎癌患者中的开发及可行性研究。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2024 Oct;22(5):102168. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102168. Epub 2024 Jul 20.
7
Acceptability and timing considerations when administering patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among people with chronic health conditions who are culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD): a qualitative study protocol.患有慢性健康状况且文化和语言多样化(CALD)人群中使用患者报告结局测量(PROMs)时的可接受性和时间考虑因素:一项定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 12;14(9):e083346. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083346.
8
The AMBER care bundle for hospital inpatients with uncertain recovery nearing the end of life: the ImproveCare feasibility cluster RCT.AMBER 关怀包用于生命末期临近、康复情况不确定的住院患者:改善关怀可行性群组 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(55):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta23550.
9
Use of an electronic patient-reported outcome measure in the management of patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: the RePROM pilot trial protocol.电子患者报告结局指标在晚期慢性肾脏病患者管理中的应用:RePROM试点试验方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 28;8(10):e026080. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026080.
10
Use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in clinical diabetes consultations: study protocol for the DiaPROM randomised controlled trial pilot study.在临床糖尿病咨询中使用患者报告结局测量(PROMs):DiaPROM 随机对照试验试点研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e024008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024008.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' experiences of engaging with electronic Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) after the completion of radiation therapy for breast cancer: a pilot service evaluation.患者在完成乳腺癌放射治疗后使用电子患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的体验:一项试点服务评估。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2023 Dec;70(4):424-435. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.711. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Supportive care needs in Australian melanoma patients and caregivers: results from a quantitative cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚黑色素瘤患者及其照护者的支持性护理需求:一项定量横断面调查的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Dec;32(12):3531-3545. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03492-0. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Supportive care and unmet needs in patients with melanoma: a mixed-methods systematic review.黑色素瘤患者的支持性护理及未满足的需求:一项混合方法的系统评价
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Aug;28(8):3489-3501. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05464-3. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Development of the Melanoma Concerns Questionnaire (MCQ-28); refinement of the EORTC QLQ-MEL38 module.开发黑素瘤担忧问卷(MCQ-28);修订 EORTC QLQ-MEL38 模块。
Psychooncology. 2020 Feb;29(2):321-330. doi: 10.1002/pon.5251. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.
《 distress management 》,版本 3.2019, NCCN 肿瘤临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Oct 1;17(10):1229-1249. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0048.
4
Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review.卵巢癌幸存者中 PROMs 的主动使用:系统评价。
J Ovarian Res. 2019 Jul 15;12(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0538-9.
5
A cross-sectional audit of current practices and areas for improvement of distress screening and management in Australian cancer services: is there a will and a way to improve?澳大利亚癌症服务机构中当前困境筛查和管理的实践和改进领域的横断面审计:是否有意愿和方法来改善?
Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jan;28(1):249-259. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04801-5. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
6
Interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores as minimally importantly different for patients with malignant melanoma.将欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 评分解释为恶性黑色素瘤患者的最小重要差异。
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Nov;104:169-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Patient reported outcomes in evaluation of chemotherapy toxicity in women with gynecologic malignancies: A pilot study.妇科恶性肿瘤患者化疗毒性评估中的患者报告结局:一项初步研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Sep;150(3):487-493. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
8
Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension.患者报告结局纳入临床试验方案指南:SPIRIT-PRO 扩展
JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):483-494. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21903.
9
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the management of lung cancer: A systematic review.患者报告的结局测量(PROMs)在肺癌管理中的应用:系统评价。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Nov;113:140-151. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.09.011. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
10
Overall Survival Results of a Trial Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes for Symptom Monitoring During Routine Cancer Treatment.一项评估常规癌症治疗期间症状监测的患者报告结局的试验的总生存结果。
JAMA. 2017 Jul 11;318(2):197-198. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7156.