Cohen Aviad, Tsur Yossi, Tako Einat, Levin Ishai, Gil Yaron, Michaan Nadav, Grisaru Dan, Laskov Ido
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Gynecology Oncology, Lis Maternity Hospital; Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Jan 3;33(1):35-41. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003991.
ObjectiveOur study's primary aim was to compare the incidence of endometrial carcinoma in patients with a presurgical diagnosis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia confined to the endometrium (EIN-E) versus endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia confined to a polyp (EIN-P). Our secondary aim was to examine the difference in pathological features, prognostic risk groups and sentinel lymph node involvement between the two groups.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study between January 2014 and December 2020 in a tertiary university-affiliated medical center. The study considered the characteristics of women who underwent hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection for endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). We compared EIN-E diagnosed by endometrial sampling via dilatation curettage or hysteroscopic curettage vs EIN-P. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors for endometrial cancer.
Eighty-eight women were included in the study, of those, 50 were women with EIN-P (EIN-P group) and 38 were women with EIN following an endometrial biopsy (EIN-E group).The median age was 57.5 years (range; 52-68) in the EIN-P group as compared with 63 years (range; 53-71) in the EIN-E group (p=0.47). Eighty-nine percent of the women in the EIN-E group presented with abnormal uterine bleeding whereas 46% of the women in the EIN-P group were asymptomatic (p=0.001). Pathology results following hysterectomy revealed concurrent endometrial carcinoma in 26% of women in the EIN-P group compared with 47% of women in the EIN-E group (p=0.038). Multivariate analysis showed that endometrial cancer was significantly less common in the EIN-P group (overall response (OR)=0.3 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.1-0.9, p=0.03). Eighty-four percent of cancers were grade one in the EIN-P group compared with 50% in the EIN-E group (p=0.048).
Concurrent endometrial cancer is less frequent with EIN-P than with EIN-E. The high incidence of endometrial carcinoma in both groups supports the current advice to perform hysterectomy for post-menopausal women. Our data does not support performing sentinel lymph node dissection for EIN-P that was completely resected. The benefit of sentinel lymph node dissection for women with pre-operative EIN-E is yet to be determined.
目的
我们研究的主要目的是比较术前诊断为局限于子宫内膜的子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(EIN-E)与局限于息肉的子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(EIN-P)患者中子宫内膜癌的发生率。我们的次要目的是检查两组之间病理特征、预后风险组和前哨淋巴结受累情况的差异。
我们于2014年1月至2020年12月在一家大学附属三级医疗中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究。该研究考虑了因子宫内膜上皮内瘤变(EIN)接受子宫切除术并进行前哨淋巴结清扫的女性的特征。我们比较了通过刮宫术或宫腔镜刮宫术进行子宫内膜取样诊断的EIN-E与EIN-P。采用多因素逻辑回归分析评估子宫内膜癌的危险因素。
88名女性纳入研究,其中50名是患有EIN-P的女性(EIN-P组),38名是子宫内膜活检后患有EIN的女性(EIN-E组)。EIN-P组的中位年龄为57.5岁(范围:52 - 68岁),而EIN-E组为63岁(范围:53 - 71岁)(p = 0.47)。EIN-E组89%的女性出现子宫异常出血,而EIN-P组46%的女性无症状(p = 0.001)。子宫切除术后的病理结果显示,EIN-P组26%的女性同时患有子宫内膜癌,而EIN-E组为47%(p = 0.038)。多因素分析显示,EIN-P组子宫内膜癌明显较少见(总体反应(OR)= 0.3,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.1 - 0.9,p = 0.03)。EIN-P组84%的癌症为一级,而EIN-E组为50%(p = 0.048)。
EIN-P并发子宫内膜癌的频率低于EIN-E。两组中子宫内膜癌的高发生率支持目前对绝经后女性进行子宫切除术的建议。我们的数据不支持对已完全切除的EIN-P进行前哨淋巴结清扫。术前EIN-E女性进行前哨淋巴结清扫的益处尚待确定。