Prenatal Genomics and Therapy (PGT) Section, Center for Precision Health Research (CPHR), National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mother Infant Research Institute (MIRI), Tufts Medical Center (TMC), Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Neurosci Res. 2023 Apr;101(4):492-507. doi: 10.1002/jnr.25160. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
Several non-verbal cognitive and behavioral tests have been developed to assess learning deficits in humans with Down syndrome (DS). Here we used rodent touchscreen paradigms in adult male mice to investigate visual discrimination (VD) learning and inhibitory control in the Dp(16)1/Yey (C57BL/6J genetic background), Ts65Dn (mixed B6 X C3H genetic background) and Ts1Cje (C57BL/6J genetic background) mouse models of DS. Dp(16)1/Yey and Ts1Cje models did not exhibit motivation or learning deficits during early pre-training, however, Ts1Cje mice showed a significant learning delay after the introduction of the incorrect stimulus (late pre-training), suggesting prefrontal cortex defects in this model. Dp(16)1/Yey and Ts1Cje mice display learning deficits in VD but these deficits were more pronounced in the Dp(16)1/Yey model. Both models also exhibited compulsive behavior and abnormal cortical inhibitory control during Extinction compared to WT littermates. Finally, Ts65Dn mice outperformed WT littermates in pre-training stages by initiating a significantly higher number of trials due to their hyperactive behavior. Both Ts65Dn and WT littermates showed poor performance during late pre-training and were not tested in VD. These studies demonstrate significant learning deficits and compulsive behavior in the Ts1Cje and Dp(16)1/Yey mouse models of DS. They also demonstrate that the mouse genetic background (C57BL/6J vs. mixed B6 X C3H) and the absence of hyperactive behavior are key determinants of successful learning in touchscreen behavioral testing. These data will be used to select the mouse model that best mimics cognitive deficits in humans with DS and evaluate the effects of future therapeutic interventions.
几种非言语认知和行为测试已被开发出来,以评估唐氏综合征(DS)患者的学习缺陷。在这里,我们使用成年雄性小鼠的啮齿动物触摸屏范式来研究视觉辨别(VD)学习和抑制控制在 Dp(16)1/Yey(C57BL/6J 遗传背景)、Ts65Dn(混合 B6 X C3H 遗传背景)和 Ts1Cje(C57BL/6J 遗传背景)DS 小鼠模型中的作用。Dp(16)1/Yey 和 Ts1Cje 模型在早期预训练期间没有表现出动机或学习缺陷,然而,Ts1Cje 小鼠在引入错误刺激后(晚期预训练)表现出明显的学习延迟,表明该模型的前额叶皮层缺陷。Dp(16)1/Yey 和 Ts1Cje 小鼠在 VD 中表现出学习缺陷,但 Dp(16)1/Yey 模型中的缺陷更为明显。与 WT 同窝仔相比,两种模型在消退期间也表现出强迫行为和异常皮质抑制控制。最后,Ts65Dn 小鼠由于其过度活跃的行为,在预训练阶段启动了明显更多的试验,从而优于 WT 同窝仔。Ts65Dn 和 WT 同窝仔在晚期预训练中表现不佳,并且不在 VD 中进行测试。这些研究表明,DS 的 Ts1Cje 和 Dp(16)1/Yey 小鼠模型存在明显的学习缺陷和强迫行为。它们还表明,小鼠遗传背景(C57BL/6J 与混合 B6 X C3H)和缺乏过度活跃的行为是触摸屏行为测试中成功学习的关键决定因素。这些数据将用于选择最能模拟 DS 患者认知缺陷的小鼠模型,并评估未来治疗干预的效果。