Ohenhen Victor, Oshomoh Samson Aiwobeuke, Akpojaro Ejovi, Enobakhare Egbe, Ovenseri Christopher, Eboreime Ejemai
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Central Hospital, Benin City, Nigeria.
Department of General Studies, Edo State College of Nursing Sciences.
J Biosoc Sci. 2023 Nov;55(6):1086-1100. doi: 10.1017/S0021932022000475. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
Across several African countries, birth preparedness and complication readiness (BPACR) among pregnant women is poor. The practice of BPACR, though improving in recent years, is not commensurate with the knowledge available to pregnant women. Maternal health indices remain sub-optimal. This study evaluates the determinants of this "know-do' gap among women receiving antenatal care at a secondary health facility in Benin City, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study involving 427 pregnant women was conducted between October and December 2020 using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire. The prevalence of knowledge and practice were described, and the determinants of BPACR practice evaluated using bivariable (chi-square) analysis and multivariable ordinal logistic regression with post-estimation predictive margins analysis. About 77% of respondents had good birth preparedness practice. Multivariable regression revealed that respondents with poor knowledge and moderate knowledge of components of BPACR had statistically significant lower odds (OR:0.05 (95% CI: 0.02-0.13) and 0.10 (95% CI: 0.03-0.30) times, respectively) for greater practice of BPACR when compared to those with good knowledge. Respondents with poor knowledge of danger signs had statistically significant lower odds (OR: 0.08 (95% CI: 0.03-0.26) for greater practice of BPACR when compared to those with good knowledge. But predictive margins analyses demonstrates that knowledge, though critical to practice, is insufficient to optimize practice. The optimum number of danger signs women need to know to improve practice may be between eight to ten. Beyond this number, practice may not change significantly. Other predictors of BPACR practice include income level, parity, gravidity, and residential settings. The number of antenatal clinic visits had no statistically significant correlation with BPACR practice. Interventions to facilitate practice at the community level may be helpful to improve outcomes and bridge the know-do gap with respect to BPACR within the study context.
在几个非洲国家,孕妇的分娩准备和并发症应对能力(BPACR)较差。尽管近年来BPACR的实施情况有所改善,但仍与孕妇所掌握的知识不相称。孕产妇健康指标仍未达到最佳水平。本研究评估了尼日利亚贝宁城一家二级医疗机构中接受产前护理的女性中这种“知行差距”的决定因素。2020年10月至12月期间,使用结构化访谈问卷对427名孕妇进行了一项横断面研究。描述了知识和实践的流行情况,并使用双变量(卡方)分析以及带有估计后预测边际分析的多变量有序逻辑回归来评估BPACR实践的决定因素。约77%的受访者有良好的分娩准备实践。多变量回归显示,与知识掌握良好的受访者相比,对BPACR组成部分知识掌握较差和中等的受访者在更大程度上实施BPACR的几率在统计学上显著更低(分别为OR:0.05(95%CI:0.02 - 0.13)倍和0.10(95%CI:0.03 - 0.30)倍)。与对危险信号知识掌握良好的受访者相比,对危险信号知识掌握较差的受访者在更大程度上实施BPACR的几率在统计学上显著更低(OR:0.08(95%CI:0.03 - 0.26))。但预测边际分析表明,知识虽然对实践至关重要,但不足以优化实践。女性为改善实践需要知道的危险信号的最佳数量可能在八到十个之间。超过这个数量,实践可能不会有显著变化。BPACR实践的其他预测因素包括收入水平、产次、妊娠次数和居住环境。产前检查的次数与BPACR实践没有统计学上的显著相关性。在社区层面促进实践的干预措施可能有助于改善结果,并弥合研究背景下BPACR方面的知行差距。