Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Mar;22(1):ar7. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-12-0331.
We developed labs on the evolution of antibiotic resistance to assess the costs and benefits of replacing traditional laboratory exercises in an introductory biology course for majors with a course-based undergraduate research experience (CURE). To assess whether participating in the CURE imposed a cost in terms of exam performance, we implemented a quasi-experiment in which four lab sections in the same term of the same course did the CURE labs, while all other students did traditional labs. To assess whether participating in the CURE impacted other aspects of student learning, we implemented a second quasi-experiment in which all students either did traditional labs over a two-quarter sequence or did CURE labs over a two-quarter sequence. Data from the first experiment showed minimal impact on CURE students' exam scores, while data from the second experiment showed that CURE students demonstrated a better understanding of the culture of scientific research and a more expert-like understanding of evolution by natural selection. We did not find disproportionate costs or benefits for CURE students from groups that are minoritized in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.
我们建立了抗生素耐药性演变实验室,以评估在主修生物学课程中用基于课程的本科生研究经验 (CURE) 替代传统实验室作业的成本和收益。为了评估参与 CURE 是否会对考试成绩造成损失,我们实施了一项准实验,在同一学期的同一门课程中,四个实验组进行 CURE 实验室,而所有其他学生则进行传统实验室。为了评估参与 CURE 是否会影响学生学习的其他方面,我们实施了第二项准实验,其中所有学生要么在两个季度的序列中进行传统实验室,要么在两个季度的序列中进行 CURE 实验室。第一个实验的数据显示,CURE 学生的考试成绩几乎没有受到影响,而第二个实验的数据显示,CURE 学生对科学研究文化有了更好的理解,对自然选择的进化有了更专家式的理解。我们没有发现少数族裔在科学、技术、工程和数学领域的 CURE 学生有不成比例的成本或收益。