Can Military Role 1 Practitioners Maintain Their Skills Working at Civilian Level 1 Trauma Centers: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND

Introduction: Military Role 1 practitioners have difficulty maintaining skill competency by working solely in military medical treatment facilities. Recognizing this, the Army Medical Department has renewed focus on physician specialty-specific Individual Critical Task Lists (ICTL) and is increasing the number of military-civilian partnerships, wherein small military treatment teams work full-time in civilian trauma centers. Yet, data to validate this approach is lacking. We hypothesize military Role 1 practitioners working full-time at a civilian Level 1 trauma center would attain similar resuscitation-specific procedural frequency to providers deployed to an active combat zone, and use the emergency medicine (EM) ICTL to compare select procedural frequency between a cohort of trauma patients from a civilian Level 1 trauma center and a cohort of combat casualties from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR).

METHODS

We compared a selected subset of critically-injured, military-aged (18-35 years) trauma patients who were seen in a Level I Trauma Center emergency department (ED) between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017 and dispositioned directly either to the operating room, intensive care unit, or morgue to a selected cohort from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) who were seen in EDs in Iraq and Afghanistan between January 2007 and August 2016 using descriptive statistics. The primary outcome was the frequency of ICTL procedures performed, and the secondary outcome was injury severity.

RESULTS

We identified 843 civilian patients meeting inclusion criteria, of 1,719 military-aged patients captured by the trauma registry during the study. The selected cohort from the DODTR included 27,359 patients. Demographics were similar between the 2 groups, except the DODTR cohort included significantly more patients with blast trauma (55% versus 0.4%). We found similar ICTL procedural frequency (1 procedure for every 1.84 patients in the civilian cohort compared to one procedure/1.52 patients in the military cohort).

CONCLUSION

Role-1 ICTL trauma procedures were performed at similar frequencies between civilian patients seen at a Level 1 trauma center and combat casualties. With proper practice implementation, the opportunity exists for Role 1 practitioners to maintain their trauma resuscitation skills at civilian trauma centers.