Schauer Steven G, Tapia Ashley D, Jeschke E Ann, Mendez Jessica, Zilevicius Danielius J, Bedolla Carlos, Gerhardt Robert T, Fairley Romeo, Stednick Peter J, Black Hunter P, Langdon Austin S, Davis William T, De Lorenzo Robert A, April Michael D
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX; Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX; and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
US Army Institute of Surgical Research, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX.
Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2023 Jan-Mar(Per 23-1/2/3):97-102.
Airway obstruction is the second leading cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield. The Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) has evolving recommendations for the optimal supraglottic airway (SGA) device for inclusion to the medics' aid bag.
We convened an expert consensus panel consisting of a mix of 8 prehospital specialists, emergency medicine experts, and experienced combat medics, with the intent to offer recommendations for optimal SGA selection. Prior to meeting, we independently reviewed previously published studies conducted by our study team, conducted a virtual meeting, and summarized the findings to the panel. The studies included an analysis of end-user after action reviews, a market analysis, engineering testing, and prospective feedback from combat medics. The panel members then made recommendations regarding their top 3 choices of devices including the options of military custom design. Simple descriptive statistics were used to analyze panel recommendations.
The preponderance (7/8, 88%) of panel members recommended the gel-cuffed SGA, followed by the self-inflating-cuff SGA (5/8, 62%) and laryngeal tube SGA (5/8, 62%). Panel members expressed concerns primarily related to the (1) devices' tolerance for the military environment, and (2) ability to effectively secure the gel-cuffed SGA and the self-inflating-cuff SGA during transport.
A preponderance of panel members selected the gel-cuff SGA with substantial feedback highlighting the need for military-specific customizations to support the combat environment needs.
气道梗阻是战场上潜在可避免死亡的第二大原因。战术战斗伤救治委员会(CoTCCC)对纳入医护人员急救包的最佳声门上气道(SGA)装置的建议不断演变。
我们召集了一个由8名院前专家、急诊医学专家和经验丰富的战斗医护人员组成的专家共识小组,旨在为最佳SGA选择提供建议。在会议之前,我们独立回顾了我们研究团队之前发表的研究,进行了一次虚拟会议,并向小组总结了研究结果。这些研究包括对最终用户行动后评估的分析、市场分析、工程测试以及战斗医护人员的前瞻性反馈。然后,小组成员就他们的前3种设备选择提出了建议,包括军事定制设计选项。使用简单的描述性统计分析小组建议。
大多数(7/8,88%)小组成员推荐凝胶袖口式SGA,其次是自动充气袖口式SGA(5/8,62%)和喉管SGA(5/8,62%)。小组成员主要表达了与以下方面相关的担忧:(1)设备对军事环境的耐受性,以及(2)在运输过程中有效固定凝胶袖口式SGA和自动充气袖口式SGA的能力。
大多数小组成员选择了凝胶袖口式SGA,大量反馈强调需要针对军事需求进行定制,以满足战斗环境的需求。