Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Basel, Switzerland.
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 6;25:e38818. doi: 10.2196/38818.
Digital interventions for health financing, if implemented at scale, have the potential to improve health system performance by reducing transaction costs and improving data-driven decision-making. However, many interventions never reach sustainability, and evidence on success factors for scale is scarce. The Insurance Management Information System (IMIS) is a digital intervention for health financing, designed to manage an insurance scheme and already implemented on a national scale in Tanzania. A previous study found that the IMIS claim function was poorly adopted by health care workers (HCWs), questioning its potential to enable strategic purchasing and succeed at scale.
This study aimed to understand why the adoption of the IMIS claim function by HCWs remained low in Tanzania and to assess implications for use at scale.
We conducted 21 semistructured interviews with HCWs and management staff in 4 districts where IMIS was first implemented. We sampled respondents by using a maximum variation strategy. We used the framework method for data analysis, applying a combination of inductive and deductive coding to organize codes in a socioecological model. Finally, we related emerging themes to a framework for digital health interventions for scale.
Respondents appreciated IMIS's intrinsic software characteristics and technical factors and acknowledged IMIS as a valuable tool to simplify claim management. Human factors, extrinsic ecosystem, and health care ecosystem were considered as barriers to widespread adoption.
Digital interventions for health financing, such as IMIS, may have the potential for scale if careful consideration is given to the environment in which they are placed. Without a sustainable health financing environment, sufficient infrastructure, and human capacity, they cannot unfold their full potential to improve health financing functions and ultimately contribute to universal health coverage.
如果数字干预措施在卫生筹资中得到大规模实施,通过降低交易成本和改善数据驱动的决策制定,有可能改善卫生系统绩效。然而,许多干预措施从未实现可持续性,而且关于规模成功因素的证据很少。保险管理信息系统(IMIS)是一种数字干预措施,用于管理保险计划,已经在坦桑尼亚全国范围内实施。先前的一项研究发现,卫生保健工作者(HCWs)对 IMIS 的索赔功能采用情况不佳,这对其实现战略采购和大规模成功的潜力提出了质疑。
本研究旨在了解为什么坦桑尼亚的 HCWs 对 IMIS 的索赔功能采用率仍然很低,并评估其在大规模使用的影响。
我们在 IMIS 首次实施的 4 个地区对 HCWs 和管理人员进行了 21 次半结构化访谈。我们采用最大变异策略对受访者进行抽样。我们使用框架方法进行数据分析,采用归纳和演绎编码相结合的方法,将代码组织到社会生态模型中。最后,我们将出现的主题与数字健康干预措施规模框架联系起来。
受访者赞赏 IMIS 的内在软件特性和技术因素,并认为 IMIS 是简化索赔管理的有价值工具。人为因素、外在生态系统和医疗保健生态系统被认为是广泛采用的障碍。
如果仔细考虑数字干预措施所处的环境,例如 IMIS 等卫生筹资数字干预措施可能具有扩大规模的潜力。如果没有可持续的卫生筹资环境、足够的基础设施和人力,它们就无法充分发挥潜力来改善卫生筹资职能,并最终为全民健康覆盖做出贡献。