• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我赢了是公平的,你赢了是不公平的。在模棱两可的情况下对优点进行选择性关注。

I win it's fair, you win it's not. Selective heeding of merit in ambiguous settings.

机构信息

Institute for Biomedical Ethics and Medical History, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Institute of Economic Research, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâte, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0279865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279865. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0279865
PMID:36608024
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9821486/
Abstract

One's willingness to accept an outcome or even to correct it depends on whether the underlying procedure is deemed legitimate. We examine a modified version of the dictator game, where dictatorship is assigned by a fair procedure that is linked to the participant actions but in effect is completely random, to illustrate that this belief is not independent of the outcome and is self-serving in its nature. We also discuss the perceptions of fairness and merit as potential drivers of the observed behavioral phenomenon.

摘要

一个人是否愿意接受某个结果,甚至是否愿意纠正这个结果,取决于其是否认为背后的程序是合法的。我们检验了改良版的独裁者游戏,在这个游戏中,独裁者是由一个与参与者行为相关但实际上完全随机的公平程序来指定的,以说明这种信念不是独立于结果的,其本质是自私自利的。我们还讨论了公平感和绩效感作为观察到的行为现象的潜在驱动因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/9821486/5503e9b84859/pone.0279865.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/9821486/2a64da796ec5/pone.0279865.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/9821486/cb8440914a36/pone.0279865.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/9821486/8e2cb42eed17/pone.0279865.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/9821486/5503e9b84859/pone.0279865.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/9821486/2a64da796ec5/pone.0279865.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/9821486/cb8440914a36/pone.0279865.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/9821486/8e2cb42eed17/pone.0279865.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ee5/9821486/5503e9b84859/pone.0279865.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
I win it's fair, you win it's not. Selective heeding of merit in ambiguous settings.我赢了是公平的,你赢了是不公平的。在模棱两可的情况下对优点进行选择性关注。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0279865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279865. eCollection 2023.
2
It's not just how the game is played, it's whether you win or lose.这不仅仅是游戏的玩法,而是关乎你是赢还是输。
Sci Adv. 2019 Jul 17;5(7):eaau1156. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau1156. eCollection 2019 Jul.
3
Home Sleep Testing: It's Not How You Play the Game, It's Whether You Win or Lose.家庭睡眠测试:关键不在于你如何进行测试,而在于测试结果是成功还是失败。
J Clin Sleep Med. 2015 Apr 15;11(4):411-2. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.4592.
4
The new ABCs of AV block. A revised classification to remove the mental block from recognizing AV block.房室传导阻滞的新ABCs。一种修订的分类方法,以消除识别房室传导阻滞时的思维障碍。
JEMS. 2002 Feb;27(2):24-34.
5
Evolution of fairness in the dictator game by multilevel selection.独裁者博弈中公平性的多层次选择演化
J Theor Biol. 2015 Oct 7;382:64-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.06.031. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
6
Gossip in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games: Its Immediate and Downstream Consequences for Cooperation.独裁者博弈和最后通牒博弈中的流言蜚语:其对合作的直接及后续影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 28;10:651. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00651. eCollection 2019.
7
Individual Differences in Good Manners Rather Than Compassion Predict Fair Allocations of Wealth in the Dictator Game.在独裁者博弈中,礼貌而非同情心方面的个体差异能够预测财富的公平分配。
J Pers. 2017 Apr;85(2):244-256. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12237. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
8
Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers.这都是关于自我的吗?自我控制消耗对最后通牒游戏提议者的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jun 13;7:240. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00240. eCollection 2013.
9
Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game.最后通牒博弈中的公平与理性
Science. 2000 Sep 8;289(5485):1773-5. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5485.1773.
10
Leadership: a peak and perk of professional development.领导力:职业发展的巅峰与福利。
Nephrol Nurs J. 2007 May-Jun;34(3):289-94.

本文引用的文献

1
It's not just how the game is played, it's whether you win or lose.这不仅仅是游戏的玩法,而是关乎你是赢还是输。
Sci Adv. 2019 Jul 17;5(7):eaau1156. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau1156. eCollection 2019 Jul.
2
Are Individuals Luck Egalitarians? - An Experiment on the Influence of Brute and Option Luck on Social Preferences.个体是运气平等主义者吗?——关于原生运气和选项运气对社会偏好影响的一项实验
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 29;8:460. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00460. eCollection 2017.
3
The flexible fairness: equality, earned entitlement, and self-interest.
弹性公平:平等、应得权益和自利。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 9;8(9):e73106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073106. eCollection 2013.
4
Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias.归因中是否存在普遍的积极偏差?对自我服务归因偏差中个体、发展和文化差异的元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2004 Sep;130(5):711-47. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711.
5
The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.情感之犬及其理性之尾:道德判断的社会直觉主义方法
Psychol Rev. 2001 Oct;108(4):814-34. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814.