University of Duisburg-Essen, Department of General Psychology: Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), Duisburg, Germany.
Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Addict Behav. 2023 Apr;139:107573. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107573. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
Permissive beliefs are considered the most proximal predictor of actual behavior. Whereas they have frequently been researched in substance-use disorders, the field of social networking sites (SNS) use is missing the investigation as to how relevant permissive beliefs might be in this context, what might be causal precursors of permissive beliefs (i.e., desire thinking), and which processes might influence the effect that permissive beliefs have on actual behavior (i.e., self-control). To answer these questions, 116 people who use SNS participated in an online survey that contained an experimental manipulation of desire thinking and questionnaires measuring permissive beliefs, self-control, and severity of problematic SNS use. In a one-week follow-up, 85 participants reported their SNS usage times. Results showed that the association between permissive beliefs and tendencies to use SNS problematically was not significant. The experimental manipulation led to a decrease in permissive beliefs in the control condition, but did not increase permissive beliefs in the desire thinking condition. Permissive beliefs predicted SNS use in the follow-up assessment, which was not moderated by self-control. The results suggest that permissive beliefs seem to be unrelated to addictive tendencies of SNS use, but are nevertheless associated with daily use. Desire thinking does not appear to activate permissive beliefs in this study, possibly because the use of social networks is less often experienced as conflicting. Due to its ubiquitous availability, the use of social networks itself might quickly resolve the conflict between desires and possible regulatory attempts, making good reasons for use unnecessary.
宽容信念被认为是实际行为最接近的预测指标。虽然它们在物质使用障碍的研究中经常被研究,但社交网络(SNS)使用领域却缺乏对宽容信念在这种情况下的相关性、可能的因果前因(即欲望思维)以及可能影响宽容信念对实际行为的影响的过程(即自我控制)的研究。为了回答这些问题,116 名使用 SNS 的人参加了一项在线调查,该调查包含了对欲望思维的实验操作以及测量宽容信念、自我控制和 SNS 使用问题严重程度的问卷。在一周的随访中,85 名参与者报告了他们的 SNS 使用时间。结果表明,宽容信念与 SNS 使用问题倾向之间的关联并不显著。实验操作导致控制条件下宽容信念下降,但在欲望思维条件下并没有增加宽容信念。宽容信念预测了随访评估中的 SNS 使用,自我控制并没有调节这种关系。结果表明,宽容信念似乎与 SNS 使用的成瘾倾向无关,但与日常使用有关。在这项研究中,欲望思维似乎并没有激活宽容信念,可能是因为社交网络的使用较少被体验为冲突。由于社交网络无处不在,其本身的使用可能会很快解决欲望和可能的调节尝试之间的冲突,使得使用的充分理由变得不必要。