Olatunji Bunmi O, Tomarken Andrew
Vanderbilt University.
Vanderbilt University.
Behav Ther. 2023 Jan;54(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
Although studies have identified differences between fear and disgust conditioning, much less is known about the generalization of conditioned disgust. This is an important gap in the literature given that overgeneralization of conditioned disgust to neutral stimuli may have clinical implications. To address this knowledge gap, female participants (n = 80) completed a Pavlovian conditioning procedure in which one neutral food item (conditioned stimulus; CS+) was followed by disgusting videos of individuals vomiting (unconditioned stimulus; US) and another neutral food item (CS-) was not reinforced with the disgusting video. Following this acquisition phase, there was an extinction phase in which both CSs were presented unreinforced. Importantly, participants also evaluated generalization stimuli (GS+, GS-) that resembled, but were distinct from, the CS after each conditioning phase. As predicted, the CS+ was rated as significantly more disgusting and fear inducing than the CS- after acquisition and this pattern persisted after extinction. However, disgust ratings of the CS+ after acquisition were significantly larger than fear ratings. Participants also rated the GS+ as significantly more disgusting, but not fear inducing, than the GS- after acquisition. However, this effect was not observed after extinction. Disgust proneness did predict a greater increase in disgust and fear ratings of the CS+ relative to the CS- after acquisition and extinction. In contrast, trait anxiety predicted only higher fear ratings to the CS+ relative to the CS- after acquisition and extinction. Disgust proneness nor trait anxiety predicted the greater increase in disgust to the GS+ relative to the GS- after acquisition. These findings suggest that while conditioned disgust can generalize, individual difference variables that predict generalization remain unclear. The implications of these findings for disorders of disgust are discussed.
尽管研究已经确定了恐惧条件作用和厌恶条件作用之间的差异,但对于条件性厌恶的泛化了解得要少得多。鉴于条件性厌恶过度泛化到中性刺激可能具有临床意义,这是文献中的一个重要空白。为了填补这一知识空白,女性参与者(n = 80)完成了一项巴甫洛夫条件作用程序,其中一种中性食物(条件刺激;CS+)之后是个体呕吐的恶心视频(无条件刺激;US),而另一种中性食物(CS-)没有与恶心视频配对。在这个习得阶段之后,有一个消退阶段,在此期间两个CS都不给予强化。重要的是,参与者在每个条件作用阶段之后还对类似于但又不同于CS的泛化刺激(GS+、GS-)进行了评估。正如预期的那样,在习得后,CS+被评为比CS-明显更恶心且更能引发恐惧,并且这种模式在消退后仍然存在。然而,习得后CS+的厌恶评分显著高于恐惧评分。参与者还将习得后的GS+评为比GS-明显更恶心,但不会引发恐惧。然而,在消退后未观察到这种效应。厌恶倾向确实预测了在习得和消退后,相对于CS-,CS+的厌恶和恐惧评分会有更大的增加。相比之下,特质焦虑仅预测在习得和消退后,相对于CS-,CS+的恐惧评分更高。厌恶倾向和特质焦虑均未预测在习得后,相对于GS-,GS+的厌恶会有更大的增加。这些发现表明,虽然条件性厌恶可以泛化,但预测泛化的个体差异变量仍不明确。本文讨论了这些发现对厌恶障碍的意义。