• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国黄河流域碳排放权交易规划的不确定性区间两阶段随机规划模型

Interval two-stage stochastic programming model under uncertainty for planning emission rights trading in the Yellow River basin of China.

作者信息

Yu Qianwen, Wu Fengping, Shen Junyuan, Xu Xia

机构信息

Business School, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, 215009, China.

Business School, Hohai University, Nanjing, 211100, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(14):40298-40314. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24794-9. Epub 2023 Jan 7.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-022-24794-9
PMID:36609756
Abstract

As a critical way to realize the optimal allocation of water environment capacity resources in the basin, emission rights trading faces multiple uncertainties, making it extremely hard and challenging to formulate appropriate decisions and plans. Therefore, this study uses interval two-stage stochastic programming (ITSP) method to model the emission rights trading process with multiple uncertainties. It can promote the secondary optimal allocation of the emission rights between the demander and the supplier after the initial allocation. Externalities caused by environmental problems are internalized through the form of emission rights trading, thereby reducing the transaction costs and promoting the coordination and integrity of water pollution control among governments in a basin. Finally, the Yellow River basin is taken as an example for case analysis. The results show that the net revenue of emission rights system in the transaction status is better than that in the non-transaction status, and the average gap of net income reaches [171.031, 193.056] billion yuan. Under different reduction policies, the average water pollutant emission reduction in transaction status is [451.15, 628.34] thousand tons, which is generally less than [516.57, 670.05] thousand tons in non-transaction status. As policies get stricter and assimilative capacity of water bodies dwindles, reduction shrinks, leading to higher risks and economic loss from being unable to meet the discharge demand. When reduction policies are relatively loose and assimilative capacity is high, emission rights trading volume peaks. At this time, the trading volume of COD reached [29.05, 40.76] thousand tons, and that of NH-N reached [3.74, 4.31] thousand tons. All these findings will offer insights for decision-makers on how to strike a balance between economic benefits and emission rights trading plans in the Yellow River basin.

摘要

作为实现流域水环境容量资源优化配置的关键途径,排污权交易面临多重不确定性,这使得制定恰当的决策和规划极为困难且具有挑战性。因此,本研究采用区间两阶段随机规划(ITSP)方法对具有多重不确定性的排污权交易过程进行建模。它能够促进初始分配后排污权在需求者和供给者之间的二次优化配置。环境问题所造成的外部性通过排污权交易的形式得以内部化,从而降低交易成本,并促进流域内各政府间水污染控制的协调与整合。最后,以黄河流域为例进行案例分析。结果表明,交易状态下排污权系统的净收益优于非交易状态,净收益平均差距达到[171.031, 193.056]亿元。在不同减排政策下,交易状态下的水污染物平均减排量为[451.15, 628.34]千吨,总体上低于非交易状态下的[516.57, 670.05]千吨。随着政策愈发严格且水体同化能力下降,减排量缩减,导致无法满足排放需求的风险和经济损失增加。当减排政策相对宽松且同化能力较高时,排污权交易量达到峰值。此时,化学需氧量(COD)交易量达到[29.05, 40.76]千吨,氨氮(NH-N)交易量达到[3.74, 4.31]千吨。所有这些研究结果将为决策者在黄河流域经济效益与排污权交易计划之间如何取得平衡提供参考。

相似文献

1
Interval two-stage stochastic programming model under uncertainty for planning emission rights trading in the Yellow River basin of China.中国黄河流域碳排放权交易规划的不确定性区间两阶段随机规划模型
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(14):40298-40314. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24794-9. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
2
Interactive Allocation of Water Pollutant Initial Emission Rights in a Basin under Total Amount Control: A Leader-Follower Hierarchical Decision Model.总量控制下流域水污染物初始排污权的交互式分配:一个领导者-跟随者层次决策模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1511. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021511.
3
Optimal Allocation of Water Resources and Eco-Compensation Mechanism Model Based on the Interval-Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Method for Tingjiang River.基于区间模糊两阶段随机规划方法的汀江流域水资源优化配置与生态补偿机制模型
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010149.
4
Development of a fuzzy-stochastic programming with Green Z-score criterion method for planning water resources systems with a trading mechanism.一种基于绿色Z分数准则方法的模糊随机规划在具有交易机制的水资源系统规划中的应用
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016 Dec;23(24):25245-25266. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-7595-z. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
5
Effluent trading in river systems through stochastic decision-making process: a case study.河流系统中的污水交易:基于随机决策过程的案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Sep;24(25):20655-20672. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9720-z. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
6
Watershed-based point sources permitting strategy and dynamic permit-trading analysis.基于流域的点源排放许可策略与动态许可交易分析
J Environ Manage. 2007 Sep;84(4):427-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.014. Epub 2006 Aug 23.
7
Introducing nonpoint source transferable quotas in nitrogen trading: The effects of transaction costs and uncertainty.氮交易中引入非点源可转让配额:交易成本和不确定性的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2016 Mar 1;168:252-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.041. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
8
A Nonlinear Inexact Two-Stage Management Model for Agricultural Water Allocation under Uncertainty Based on the Heihe River Water Diversion Plan.基于黑河分水方案的农业水资源分配不确定性的非线性非精确两阶段管理模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 28;16(11):1884. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111884.
9
Different policies constrained agricultural non-point pollutants emission trading management for water system under interval, fuzzy, and stochastic information.不同政策制约了区间、模糊和随机信息下水系农业非点源污染物排放交易管理。
Environ Res. 2024 May 1;248:117809. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117809. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
10
An inexact fuzzy two-stage stochastic model for quantifying the efficiency of nonpoint source effluent trading under uncertainty.一种用于量化不确定性下非点源污水交易效率的不精确模糊两阶段随机模型。
Sci Total Environ. 2005 Jul 15;347(1-3):21-34. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.12.040. Epub 2005 Mar 5.