Department of Medicine and Health Science, University of Nottingham at Derby, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
Department of Palliative Care Medicine, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK.
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 Sep;27(9):729-738. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02747-1. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
Quantitative futility is an appraisal of the risk of failure of a treatment. For those who do not survive, a laparotomy has provided negligible therapeutic benefit and may represent a missed opportunity for palliation. The aim of this study was to define a timeframe for quantitative futility in emergency laparotomy and investigate predictors of futility using the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) database.
A two-stage methodology was used; stage one defined a timeframe for futility using an online survey and steering group discussion; stage two applied this definition to patients enrolled in NELA December 2013-December 2020 for analysis. Futility was defined as all-cause mortality within 3 days of emergency laparotomy. Baseline characteristics of this group were compared to all others. Multilevel logistic regression was carried out with potentially clinically important predictors defined a priori.
Quantitative futility occurred in 4% of patients (7442/180,987). Median age was 74 years (range 65-81 years). Median NELA risk score was 32.4% vs. 3.8% in the surviving cohort (p < 0.001). Early mortality patients more frequently presented with sepsis (p < 0.001). Significant predictors of futility included age, arterial lactate and cardiorespiratory co-morbidity. Frailty was associated with a 38% increased risk of early mortality (95% CI 1.22-1.55). Surgery for intestinal ischaemia was associated with a two times greater chance of futile surgery (OR 2.67; 95% CI 2.50-2.85).
Quantitative futility after emergency laparotomy is associated with quantifiable risk factors available to decision-makers preoperatively. These findings should be incorporated qualitatively by the multidisciplinary team into shared decision-making discussions with extremely high-risk patients.
定量无效性是对治疗失败风险的评估。对于那些无法存活的患者,剖腹手术几乎没有治疗益处,可能代表着姑息治疗的机会错失。本研究旨在确定急诊剖腹手术中定量无效的时间范围,并使用国家急诊剖腹手术审计(NELA)数据库研究无效的预测因素。
采用两阶段方法;第一阶段使用在线调查和指导小组讨论定义无效的时间范围;第二阶段将该定义应用于 2013 年 12 月至 2020 年 12 月期间纳入 NELA 的患者进行分析。无效定义为急诊剖腹手术后 3 天内的全因死亡率。将该组的基线特征与所有其他组进行比较。使用预先定义的潜在临床重要预测因素进行多级逻辑回归。
定量无效发生在 4%的患者(7442/180987)中。中位年龄为 74 岁(范围 65-81 岁)。中位 NELA 风险评分在无效组为 32.4%,而在存活组为 3.8%(p<0.001)。早期死亡患者更常表现为脓毒症(p<0.001)。无效的显著预测因素包括年龄、动脉乳酸和心肺合并症。虚弱与早期死亡风险增加 38%相关(95%CI 1.22-1.55)。肠缺血手术与无效手术的可能性增加两倍相关(OR 2.67;95%CI 2.50-2.85)。
急诊剖腹手术后的定量无效与术前决策者可获得的可量化风险因素相关。这些发现应由多学科团队定性纳入与极高风险患者的共同决策讨论中。