• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受急诊高风险手术患者的术后早期死亡:旨在更好地了解手术可能无益的患者。

Early Postoperative Death in Patients Undergoing Emergency High-Risk Surgery: Towards a Better Understanding of Patients for Whom Surgery May Not Be Beneficial.

作者信息

Aggarwal Geeta, Broughton Katherine J, Williams Linda J, Peden Carol J, Quiney Nial

机构信息

Consultant Anaesthetist. Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford GU2 7XX, Surrey, UK.

Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 0SF, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 29;9(5):1288. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051288.

DOI:10.3390/jcm9051288
PMID:32365617
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7288295/
Abstract

The timing, causes, and quality of care for patients who die after emergency laparotomy have not been extensively reported. A large database of 13,953 patients undergoing emergency laparotomy, between July 2014 and March 2017, from 28 hospitals in England was studied. Anonymized data was extracted on day of death, patient demographics, operative details, compliance with standards of care, and 30-day and in-patient mortality. Thirty-day mortality was 8.9%, and overall inpatient mortality was 9.8%. Almost 40% of postoperative deaths occurred within three days of surgery, and 70% of these early deaths occurred on the day of surgery or the first postoperative day. Such early deaths could be considered nonbeneficial surgery. Patients who died within three days of surgery had a significantly higher preoperative lactate, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) grade, and Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enumeration of Mortality and morbidity (P-POSSUM). Compliance with perioperative standards of care based on the Emergency Laparotomy Collaborative care bundle was high overall and better for those patients who died within three days of surgery. Multidisciplinary team involvement from intensive care, care of the elderly physicians, and palliative care may help both the communication and the burden of responsibility in deciding on the risk-benefit of operative versus nonoperative approaches to care.

摘要

急诊剖腹手术后死亡患者的护理时机、原因及质量尚未得到广泛报道。对2014年7月至2017年3月期间来自英国28家医院的13953例接受急诊剖腹手术的患者的大型数据库进行了研究。提取了关于死亡日期、患者人口统计学特征、手术细节、护理标准依从性以及30天和住院死亡率的匿名数据。30天死亡率为8.9%,总体住院死亡率为9.8%。近40%的术后死亡发生在术后三天内,其中70%的早期死亡发生在手术当天或术后第一天。这种早期死亡可被视为无益手术。术后三天内死亡的患者术前乳酸水平、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)分级以及用于计算死亡率和发病率的生理和手术严重程度评分(P-POSSUM)显著更高。基于急诊剖腹手术协作护理包的围手术期护理标准总体依从性较高,对于术后三天内死亡的患者更好。重症监护、老年内科医生护理和姑息治疗的多学科团队参与可能有助于在决定手术与非手术护理方法的风险效益时进行沟通并分担责任。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e09/7288295/18dd3c01ff33/jcm-09-01288-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e09/7288295/f5bd120b9d66/jcm-09-01288-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e09/7288295/18dd3c01ff33/jcm-09-01288-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e09/7288295/f5bd120b9d66/jcm-09-01288-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e09/7288295/18dd3c01ff33/jcm-09-01288-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Early Postoperative Death in Patients Undergoing Emergency High-Risk Surgery: Towards a Better Understanding of Patients for Whom Surgery May Not Be Beneficial.接受急诊高风险手术患者的术后早期死亡:旨在更好地了解手术可能无益的患者。
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 29;9(5):1288. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051288.
2
Evaluation of the Collaborative Use of an Evidence-Based Care Bundle in Emergency Laparotomy.评价基于循证的护理捆绑在急诊剖腹术中的联合应用。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):e190145. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0145. Epub 2019 May 15.
3
Validation of the NELA risk prediction model in emergency abdominal surgery.验证 NELA 风险预测模型在急诊腹部手术中的应用。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Oct;67(9):1194-1201. doi: 10.1111/aas.14294. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
4
Benchmarking against the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit recommendations.对照国家急诊剖腹手术审核建议进行基准测试。
ANZ J Surg. 2018 May;88(5):428-433. doi: 10.1111/ans.14164. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
5
Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models.评估结直肠癌手术的手术风险:基于美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)和朴茨茅斯评分系统(POSSUM)的预测模型
Surg Oncol. 2004 Aug-Nov;13(2-3):83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2004.08.006.
6
Efficacy of POSSUM score in predicting the outcome in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.POSSUM评分在预测急诊剖腹手术患者预后中的效能。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2014 Apr;86(4):159-65. doi: 10.2478/pjs-2014-0029.
7
High-Risk Emergency Laparotomy in Australia: Comparing NELA, P-POSSUM, and ACS-NSQIP Calculators.澳大利亚高危急诊剖腹术:比较 NELA、P-POSSUM 和 ACS-NSQIP 计算器。
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:300-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
8
Aspects of survival from colorectal cancer in Denmark.丹麦结直肠癌的生存情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Apr;59(4):B4428.
9
Morbidity and mortality rates after emergency abdominal surgery: an analysis of 4346 patients scheduled for emergency laparotomy or laparoscopy.急诊腹部手术后的发病率和死亡率:对4346例计划进行急诊剖腹手术或腹腔镜检查的患者的分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Jun;402(4):615-623. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1493-1. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
10
Comparison of the possum, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems as predictors of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery.负鼠评分系统、P-POSSUM评分系统和Cr-POSSUM评分系统在预测接受大肠大手术患者术后死亡率方面的比较。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Sep;76(9):812-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03875.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence between frailty, sarcopenia and physical status on mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy.急诊剖腹手术患者中衰弱、肌肉减少症及身体状况对死亡率的影响。
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 30;20(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00588-5.
2
Costs of surgical futility in emergency laparotomy.急诊剖腹手术中手术无效的成本。
Surg Pract Sci. 2025 Feb 3;20:100273. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2025.100273. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Emergency laparotomy preoperative risk assessment tool performance: A systematic review.急诊剖腹手术术前风险评估工具的性能:一项系统评价。

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective cohort study characterising patients declined emergency laparotomy: survival in the 'NoLap' population.一项前瞻性队列研究描述了拒绝急诊剖腹手术的患者特征:“不剖腹”人群的生存率。
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jan;75(1):54-62. doi: 10.1111/anae.14839. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
2
Early postoperative death in extreme-risk patients: A perspective on surgical futility.高危患者的术后早期死亡:对手术无效性的看法。
Surgery. 2019 Sep;166(3):380-385. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Evaluation of the Collaborative Use of an Evidence-Based Care Bundle in Emergency Laparotomy.
Surg Pract Sci. 2024 Oct 31;19:100264. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2024.100264. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Perioperative mortality rate and its predictors after emergency laparatomy at Debre Markos comprehensive specialized hospital, Northwest Ethiopia: 2023: retrospective follow-up study.在埃塞俄比亚西北部的德布雷马科斯综合专科医院进行紧急剖腹手术后的围手术期死亡率及其预测因素:2023 年:回顾性随访研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Apr 16;24(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02401-7.
5
Futility in acute care surgery: first do no harm.急性护理手术中的无效治疗:首要原则是不造成伤害。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2023 Sep 25;8(1):e001167. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2023-001167. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison between P-POSSUM and NELA risk score for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy in Egyptian patients.埃及患者行急诊剖腹手术时 P-POSSUM 和 NELA 风险评分的比较。
BMC Surg. 2023 Sep 21;23(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02189-y.
7
Perioperative mortality of emergency and elective surgical patients in a low-income country: a single institution experience.低收入国家急诊和择期手术患者的围手术期死亡率:单机构经验
Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Sep 16;12(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00341-z.
8
Consensus Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Emergency Laparotomy Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendations Part 2-Emergency Laparotomy: Intra- and Postoperative Care.《围手术期紧急剖腹术患者管理的共识指南:术后加速康复(ERAS)协会推荐意见第 2 部分-紧急剖腹术:围术期和术后护理》。
World J Surg. 2023 Aug;47(8):1850-1880. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07020-6. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
9
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Consensus Guidelines for Emergency Laparotomy Part 3: Organizational Aspects and General Considerations for Management of the Emergency Laparotomy Patient.外科术后加速康复(ERAS®)协会共识指南:急诊剖腹术部分 3:组织结构方面和急诊剖腹术患者管理的一般注意事项。
World J Surg. 2023 Aug;47(8):1881-1898. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07039-9. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
10
Predictive Performance of NELA Versus P-POSSUM Mortality Scores: Are We Underestimating the Risk of Mortality Following Emergency Laparotomy?NELA与P-POSSUM死亡率评分的预测性能:我们是否低估了急诊剖腹手术后的死亡风险?
Cureus. 2022 Dec 23;14(12):e32859. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32859. eCollection 2022 Dec.
评价基于循证的护理捆绑在急诊剖腹术中的联合应用。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):e190145. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0145. Epub 2019 May 15.
4
High Burden of Palliative Care Needs of Older Adults During Emergency Major Abdominal Surgery.老年患者在急诊大腹部手术期间的姑息治疗需求负担高。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2072-2078. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15516. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
Indicated But Not Always Appropriate: Surgery in Terminally Ill Patients With Abdominal Catastrophe.有指征但并非总是适宜:晚期腹部急症患者的手术治疗
Ann Surg. 2018 Jul;268(1):e4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002777.
6
Critical differences between elective and emergency surgery: identifying domains for quality improvement in emergency general surgery.择期手术和急诊手术的关键差异:确定急诊普通外科质量改进的领域。
Surgery. 2018 Apr;163(4):832-838. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2017.11.017. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
7
Influence of frailty in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a UK-based observational study.衰弱对接受急诊剖腹手术的老年患者的影响:一项基于英国的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e017928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017928.
8
Frailty as a predictor of mortality in the elderly emergency general surgery patient.衰弱作为老年急诊普通外科患者死亡率的预测指标。
Acta Chir Belg. 2017 Dec;117(6):370-375. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2017.1337339. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
9
Prime Time for Shared Decision Making.共同决策的黄金时机。
JAMA. 2017 Apr 4;317(13):1309-1310. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0616.
10
The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review.多学科团队会议对胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者的价值:系统评价。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Sep;24(9):2669-2678. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3. Epub 2017 Mar 23.