College of Economics and Management, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou 450000, China.
School of Marxism, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200233, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 21;20(1):98. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010098.
At present, China's economy is developing rapidly; however, at the same time, it is also bringing more and more serious environmental problems. Although many laws have been established in the country to limit pollution by enterprises-and enterprises are actively saving energy and reducing pollution-the situation is still not optimistic. In 2016, there were 35 cities across the country that exceeded the annual average air quality standard; these regions have been plagued by haze for a long time, which seriously threatens people's health and sustainable social and economic development. Therefore, while pursuing economic benefits and realizing greater value, importance must be attached to environmental performance, especially for enterprises with serious pollution. Using the panel regression analysis method, based on the data of enterprises from 2010 to 2019, this paper empirically analyzes the effects of government environmental protection subsidies and internal control quality on the environmental performance of heavily polluting enterprises, and verifies the nonlinear critical effect of government subsidies and internal control on environmental performance. In addition, this paper also uses the intermediate effect model to verify the mechanism by which environmental subsidies impact the environmental performance of heavily polluting enterprises. Through the empirical analysis, the effects of environmental protection subsidies and internal control on the environmental performance of enterprises with serious pollution are obtained. In the process of environmental subsidy affecting the environmental performance of heavy-polluting enterprises, internal control plays a key intermediary role. In addition, environmental subsidies and internal controls have a certain impact on the environmental performance of heavily polluting enterprises. Through the empirical analysis, it is concluded that there are obvious differences between government subsidies and internal control on the environmental governance effects of heavily polluting enterprises in different regions and with different property rights. Among them, the environmental protection subsidies have the greatest impact on pollution degree in the central region, followed by the eastern region; in the western region, it is not obvious. Secondly, the incentive effect of government environmental subsidies on state-owned enterprises with serious environmental pollution is better than the environmental governance effect of non-state-owned enterprises.
目前,中国经济发展迅速;然而,与此同时,它也带来了越来越严重的环境问题。尽管国家已经制定了许多法律来限制企业的污染——企业也在积极节约能源和减少污染——但情况仍不容乐观。2016 年,全国有 35 个城市超过了年度空气质量标准;这些地区长期受到雾霾的困扰,严重威胁着人们的健康和可持续的社会经济发展。因此,在追求经济效益和实现更大价值的同时,必须重视环境绩效,特别是对于污染严重的企业。本文采用面板回归分析方法,基于 2010 年至 2019 年企业数据,实证分析了政府环保补贴和内部控制质量对重污染企业环境绩效的影响,并验证了政府补贴和内部控制对环境绩效的非线性临界效应。此外,本文还利用中介效应模型验证了环境补贴对重污染企业环境绩效的影响机制。通过实证分析,得出了环保补贴和内部控制对重污染企业环境绩效的影响效应。在环境补贴影响重污染企业环境绩效的过程中,内部控制发挥着关键的中介作用。此外,环境补贴和内部控制对重污染企业的环境绩效有一定的影响。通过实证分析得出,政府补贴和内部控制对不同地区、不同产权性质的重污染企业的环境治理效果存在明显差异。其中,环保补贴对中部地区污染程度的影响最大,其次是东部地区;西部地区则不明显。其次,政府环境补贴对重污染国有企业的激励效应优于非国有企业的环境治理效应。