Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey; Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 May;163(5):700-709. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2022.05.022. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
In this study, we compared the effects of functional treatment with Twin-block appliance on the bony architectures of the maxilla and mandible by fractal dimension (FD) analysis, and the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects by cephalometric analysis, in pubertal and postpubertal patients with Class II malocclusion.
This study comprised 60 patients who underwent Twin-block treatment. Group 1 consisted of 30 patients in the pubertal period (6 boys and 24 girls; mean age 12.27 ± 1.35 years), whereas group 2 consisted of 30 patients in the postpubertal period (6 boys and 24 girls; mean age 13.73 ± 1.51 years). FD analysis was performed on the patients before and after Twin-block panoramic and lateral cephalometric radiographs. Cephalometric analysis was also conducted. Paired and Student t tests were used to compare the parametric data, and Wilcoxon signed rank and Mann-Whitney U tests were conducted to compare the nonparametric data.
SNB, Pg-N, N-Me, ANS-Me, IMPA, L1/NB, Co-Gn, Go-Gn, S-Go, Co-Go, and Go-Me significantly increased in both groups after treatment. FD values of tuber, condyle, and molar regions significantly decreased in group 1, whereas no significant differences were observed in group 2 after treatment.
In the pubertal period, the Twin-block appliance resulted in skeletal correction by causing bone remodeling and reshaping in both jaws along with the dentoalveolar correction. In the postpubertal period, Twin-block had no significant effect on the bone trabecular arrangement in the investigated areas but produced cephalometric improvement to a certain extent with lower skeletal and higher dental impact.
本研究通过分形维数(FD)分析比较了功能性治疗与 Twin-block 矫治器对上颌和下颌骨骨结构的影响,并通过头影测量分析比较了青春前期和青春期 II 类错颌患者的骨骼和牙牙槽效应。
本研究共纳入 60 例接受 Twin-block 治疗的患者。第 1 组包括 30 例青春期患者(6 名男性,24 名女性;平均年龄 12.27 ± 1.35 岁),第 2 组包括 30 例青春期后患者(6 名男性,24 名女性;平均年龄 13.73 ± 1.51 岁)。在 Twin-block 全景和侧位头颅侧位片拍摄前后对患者进行 FD 分析。同时进行头影测量分析。采用配对和 t 检验比较参数数据,采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验和 Mann-Whitney U 检验比较非参数数据。
SNB、Pg-N、N-Me、ANS-Me、IMPA、L1/NB、Co-Gn、Go-Gn、S-Go、Co-Go 和 Go-Me 在两组治疗后均显著增加。第 1 组的结节、髁突和磨牙区 FD 值显著降低,而第 2 组治疗后无显著差异。
在青春期,Twin-block 矫治器通过对上、下颌骨的骨重塑和重塑以及牙牙槽矫正,导致了骨骼矫正。在青春期后,Twin-block 对研究区域的骨小梁排列没有显著影响,但在一定程度上产生了头影测量改善,具有较低的骨骼和较高的牙齿影响。