Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Toulouse, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
Centre National de Ressources et de Résilience Lille-Paris, Lille, France.
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jan 9;23(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04503-z.
Suicide is a major health problem globally. As attempted suicide is a major risk factor for suicide, specific prevention strategies have been designed for use thereafter. An example is the brief contact intervention (BCI). In this regard, France employs a composite BCI, VigilanS, which utilizes three types of contact: phone calls, postcards and a 'who to contact in a crisis' card. Previous studies have found that this system is effective at preventing suicide. Nevertheless, VigilanS was not effective in the same way for all the patients included. This observation raises the question of specific adaptation during follow-up for populations that were less receptive to the service. In consideration of this issue, we identified one study which found that incoming calls to the service were linked with a higher risk of suicide reattempts. However, this study did not document the profiles of the patients who made these calls. Better understanding of why this population is more at risk is important in terms of identifying factors that could be targeted to improve follow-up. This research therefore aims to bring together such data.
We performed a retrospective analysis of 579 patients referred to VigilanS by Toulouse University Hospital (France). We examined the sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and follow-ups in place and compared the patients who made incoming calls to the service versus those who did not. Subsequently, we conducted a regression analysis using the significantly associated element of patients calling VigilanS. Then, in order to better understand this association, we analyzed the factors, including such calls, that were linked to the risk of suicide reattempts.
We found that 22% of the patients in our sample called the VigilanS service. These individuals: were older, at 41.4 years versus 37.9 years for the non-callers; were more likely to have a borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis (28.9% versus 19.3%); and had a history of suicide attempts (71.9% versus 54.6%). Our analysis confirmed that incoming calls to VigilanS (OR = 2.9) were associated with reattempted suicide, as were BPD (OR = 1.8) and a history of suicide attempts (OR = 1.7).
There was a high risk that the patients calling VigilanS would make another suicide attempt. However, this association was present regardless of the clinical profile. We postulate that this link between incoming calls and reattempted suicide may arise because this form of contact is, in fact, a way in which patients signal that a further attempt will be made.
自杀是一个全球性的主要健康问题。由于自杀未遂是自杀的一个主要危险因素,因此专门制定了具体的预防策略。简短接触干预(BCI)就是一个例子。在这方面,法国采用了一种综合的 BCI,即 VigilanS,它利用三种类型的联系:电话、明信片和“危机时联系谁”的卡片。先前的研究发现,该系统在预防自杀方面非常有效。然而,VigilanS 并非对所有纳入的患者都同样有效。这一观察结果提出了一个问题,即在对服务接受程度较低的人群进行后续随访时,需要进行具体的调整。考虑到这一点,我们发现了一项研究表明,该服务接到的来电与自杀再尝试的风险更高有关。然而,这项研究并没有记录拨打这些电话的患者的个人资料。更好地了解为什么这部分人群的风险更高,对于确定可以针对其进行改进的因素很重要。因此,这项研究旨在汇集这些数据。
我们对来自法国图卢兹大学医院的 579 名被转介到 VigilanS 的患者进行了回顾性分析。我们检查了社会人口统计学、临床特征以及正在进行的随访情况,并比较了拨打该服务热线的患者与未拨打的患者。随后,我们使用与患者拨打 VigilanS 服务相关的显著关联元素进行了回归分析。然后,为了更好地理解这种关联,我们分析了与自杀再尝试风险相关的因素,包括这些来电。
我们发现,我们样本中的 22%的患者拨打了 VigilanS 服务热线。这些人:年龄较大,为 41.4 岁,而非来电者为 37.9 岁;更有可能被诊断为边缘型人格障碍(BPD)(28.9%对 19.3%);有自杀未遂史(71.9%对 54.6%)。我们的分析证实,拨打 VigilanS(OR=2.9)与自杀再尝试有关,BPD(OR=1.8)和自杀未遂史(OR=1.7)也是如此。
拨打 VigilanS 服务热线的患者再次自杀的风险很高。然而,这种关联存在于任何临床特征之外。我们推测,来电与再尝试自杀之间的这种联系可能是因为这种联系实际上是患者发出进一步尝试自杀的信号。