Lanier William L
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Anesthesiology. 2023 Feb 1;138(2):209-215. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004437.
Cerebral Function and Muscle Afferent Activity Following Intravenous Succinylcholine in Dogs Anesthetized with Halothane: The Effects of Pretreatment with a Defasciculating Dose of Pancuronium. By WL Lanier, PA Iaizzo, and JH Milde. Anesthesiology 1989; 71:87-95. Reprinted with permission. By the mid-1980s, it was widely assumed that if the depolarizing muscle relaxant, succinylcholine, given IV, produced increases in intracranial pressure, it did so because fasciculations produced increases in intrathoracic and central venous pressures that were transferred to the brain; however, there was no direct evidence that this was true. In contrast, we explored the possibility that the succinylcholine effect on the brain was explained by the afferentation theory of cerebral arousal, which predicts that agents or maneuvers that stimulate muscle stretch receptors will tend to stimulate the brain. Our research in tracheally intubated, lightly anesthetized dogs discovered that IV succinylcholine (which does not cross the blood-brain barrier) produced a doubling of cerebral blood flow that lasted for 30 min and corresponded to activation of the electroencephalogram and increases in intracranial pressure. Later, in our Classic Paper, we were able to assess simultaneously cerebral physiology and afferent nerve traffic emanating from muscle stretch receptors (primarily muscle spindles). We affirmed that the cerebral arousal response to succinylcholine was indeed driven by muscle afferent traffic and was independent of fasciculations or increases in intrathoracic or central venous pressures. Later research in complementary models demonstrated that endogenous movement (e.g., coughing, hiccups) produced a cerebral response very similar to IV succinylcholine, apparently as a result of the same muscle afferent mechanisms, independent of intrathoracic and central venous pressures. Thus, the importance of afferentation theory as a driver of the cerebral state of arousal and cerebral physiology during anesthesia was affirmed.
预注去极化剂量泮库溴铵的影响。作者:WL·拉尼尔、PA·艾佐和JH·米尔德。《麻醉学》1989年;71:87 - 95。经许可重印。到20世纪80年代中期,人们普遍认为,如果静脉注射去极化肌松药琥珀酰胆碱会导致颅内压升高,其原因是肌束震颤导致胸内压和中心静脉压升高并传递至脑部;然而,尚无直接证据证明这一点。相比之下,我们探讨了琥珀酰胆碱对大脑的影响可由大脑觉醒的传入理论来解释的可能性,该理论预测,刺激肌肉牵张感受器的药物或操作往往会刺激大脑。我们对气管插管、轻度麻醉的犬进行的研究发现,静脉注射琥珀酰胆碱(其不能透过血脑屏障)可使脑血流量增加一倍,持续30分钟,同时伴有脑电图激活和颅内压升高。后来,在我们的经典论文中,我们能够同时评估脑生理学以及源自肌肉牵张感受器(主要是肌梭)的传入神经活动。我们证实,琥珀酰胆碱引起的大脑觉醒反应确实是由肌肉传入活动驱动的,与肌束震颤或胸内压或中心静脉压升高无关。后来在补充模型中的研究表明,内源性运动(如咳嗽、打嗝)产生的脑反应与静脉注射琥珀酰胆碱非常相似,显然是由于相同的肌肉传入机制,与胸内压和中心静脉压无关。因此,传入理论作为麻醉期间大脑觉醒状态和脑生理学驱动因素的重要性得到了证实。