• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于患者和手术因素对微创前路和臀侧入路全髋关节置换术后早期假体周围关节感染影响的倾向评分匹配分析。

A propensity score-matched analysis on the impact of patient and surgical factors on early periprosthetic joint infection in minimally invasive anterolateral and transgluteal total hip arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department for Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital GmbH, Krankenhausstrasse 9, 4020, Linz, Austria.

Johannes Kepler University Linz, Altenberger Strasse 69, 4040, Linz, Austria.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):5405-5415. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04756-z. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-022-04756-z
PMID:36629904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10374686/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in minimally invasive (MIS) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is still debated. This study aimed to identify differences in surgical and patient-related risk factors for PJI between an MIS anterolateral approach and transgluteal-modified Hardinge approach.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 5315 THAs performed between 2006 and 2019 at a single institution was screened. Short stem THAs performed via an MIS anterolateral approach in the supine position and standard straight stem THAs performed via a transgluteal modified Hardinge approach were included. Propensity score matching was performed to control for selection bias. After matching, 1405 (34.3%) short stem THAs implanted via MIS anterolateral approach and 2687 (65.7%) straight stem THAs implanted via a transgluteal modified Hardinge approach were included. The risk of PJI due to patient-specific and surgical factors was retrospectively analyzed using chi-square test and multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

PJI occurred in 1.1% in both MIS anterolateral and transgluteal approach (p = 0.823). Multivariate regression showed an increased infection risk for patients with a BMI between 35 and 39.99 kg/m (OR 6.696; CI 1.799-24.923; p = 0.005), which could not be demonstrated for transgluteal approach (OR 0.900; CI 0.900-4.144; p = 0.93). A BMI ≥ 40 kg/m (OR 14.150; CI 2.416-82.879; p = 0.003) was detected as a risk factor for PJI only in anterolateral approach. Increased operation time ≥ 121 min showed a significantly increased risk for PJI in the general cohort (OR 6.989; CI1.286-37.972; p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Minimally invasive anterolateral and transgluteal THA show a comparable rate of early PJI within the first year of index surgery. A BMI of ≥ 35 kg/m was detected as a clear risk factor for infection in the anterolateral approach. Prolonged operation time ≥ 121 min increases the risk of PJI regardless of approach.

摘要

简介

微创全髋关节置换术(THA)中假体周围关节感染(PJI)风险增加仍存在争议。本研究旨在确定微创前路和改良经臀后路 Hardinge 入路在手术和患者相关 PJI 危险因素方面的差异。

方法

对 2006 年至 2019 年在一家单中心进行的 5315 例 THA 进行回顾性队列筛查。纳入了采用微创前路仰卧位短柄 THA 和改良经臀后路 Hardinge 直柄 THA。采用倾向评分匹配来控制选择偏倚。匹配后,纳入 1405 例(34.3%)采用微创前路短柄 THA 和 2687 例(65.7%)采用改良经臀后路 Hardinge 直柄 THA。采用卡方检验和多因素回归分析回顾性分析患者特定和手术因素导致 PJI 的风险。

结果

微创前路和改良经臀后路的 PJI 发生率分别为 1.1%(p=0.823)。多因素回归显示 BMI 在 35 至 39.99kg/m2 之间的患者感染风险增加(OR 6.696;95%CI 1.799-24.923;p=0.005),而改良经臀后路未发现(OR 0.900;95%CI 0.900-4.144;p=0.93)。仅在微创前路中,BMI≥40kg/m2(OR 14.150;95%CI 2.416-82.879;p=0.003)被确定为 PJI 的危险因素。手术时间≥121 分钟的患者发生 PJI 的风险显著增加(OR 6.989;95%CI 1.286-37.972;p=0.024)。

结论

微创前路和改良经臀后路 THA 在索引手术的第一年早期 PJI 发生率相当。BMI≥35kg/m2 被确定为微创前路感染的明确危险因素。手术时间延长≥121 分钟会增加 PJI 的风险,与手术入路无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/10374686/489641ee9b78/402_2022_4756_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/10374686/489641ee9b78/402_2022_4756_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2663/10374686/489641ee9b78/402_2022_4756_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A propensity score-matched analysis on the impact of patient and surgical factors on early periprosthetic joint infection in minimally invasive anterolateral and transgluteal total hip arthroplasty.基于患者和手术因素对微创前路和臀侧入路全髋关节置换术后早期假体周围关节感染影响的倾向评分匹配分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Aug;143(8):5405-5415. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04756-z. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
Obesity in short stem total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive supine anterolateral approach-a risk factor for short-term complications?微创仰卧前路短柄全髋关节置换术治疗肥胖患者:短期并发症的危险因素?
Int Orthop. 2021 Nov;45(11):2833-2841. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05079-1. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
3
Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Short Versus Straight Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.非骨水泥型短柄与直柄全髋关节置换术中假体周围股骨骨折:倾向评分匹配分析
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Apr;38(4):751-756. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.10.027. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
4
Low rate of early periprosthetic fractures in cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive anterolateral approach.微创前外侧入路在非骨水泥短柄全髋关节置换术中早期周围骨折发生率低。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2021 May 21;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s10195-021-00583-x.
5
Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures.全髋关节置换术不同手术入路的假体周围关节感染率:653633 例手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2965-2977. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04186-3. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
6
The Impact of Surgical Approach on 90-Day Prosthetic Joint Infection After Total Hip Replacement - A Population-Based, Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.手术入路对全髋关节置换术后 90 天假体关节感染的影响——一项基于人群、倾向评分匹配队列研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan;39(1):151-156. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.033. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
7
Digital templating cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty: is there a difference in planning adherence between the direct anterior approach and minimally invasive anterolateral approach?数字化模板无水泥短柄全髋关节置换术:直接前入路与微创前外侧入路在规划符合率方面是否存在差异?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Mar;143(3):1619-1626. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04374-9. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
8
Outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty following septic arthritis of the hip : a case-control study.髋关节化脓性关节炎初次全髋关节置换术的疗效:病例对照研究。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Feb;104-B(2):227-234. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1209.R1.
9
The Impact of Patient and Surgical Factors on the Rate of Postoperative Infection After Total Hip Arthroplasty-A New Zealand Joint Registry Study.患者和手术因素对全髋关节置换术后感染率的影响:新西兰关节登记研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jun;33(6):1884-1890. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
10
Prior hip or knee prosthetic joint infection in another joint increases risk three-fold of prosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty: a matched control study.原发全膝关节置换术后其他关节既往髋关节或膝关节假体关节感染使假体关节感染风险增加三倍:一项匹配对照研究。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jul;101-B(7_Supple_C):91-97. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1189.R1.

引用本文的文献

1
Abdominal Pannus Should Not Dictate Surgical Approach in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.在初次全髋关节置换术中,腹部 pannus 不应决定手术入路。
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Mar 26;33:101675. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101675. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Does Surgical Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty Impact Infection Risk in the Obese Patient? A Systematic Review.全髋关节置换术的手术入路是否会影响肥胖患者的感染风险?系统评价。
Orthopedics. 2022 Mar-Apr;45(2):e67-e72. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20211227-03. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
2
Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures.全髋关节置换术不同手术入路的假体周围关节感染率:653633 例手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2965-2977. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04186-3. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
3
Obesity in short stem total hip arthroplasty using a minimally invasive supine anterolateral approach-a risk factor for short-term complications?
微创仰卧前路短柄全髋关节置换术治疗肥胖患者:短期并发症的危险因素?
Int Orthop. 2021 Nov;45(11):2833-2841. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05079-1. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
4
Direct Anterior Approach to the Hip Does Not Increase the Risk for Subsequent Periprosthetic Joint Infection.直接前入路髋关节置换术并不会增加假体周围关节感染的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):2038-2043. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
5
Early Rate of Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty Related to Surgical Approach: An Analysis of 122,345 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.全髋关节置换术相关手术入路的早期翻修率:122345 例初次全髋关节置换术的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Nov 4;102(21):1874-1882. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01289.
6
Perioperative Complications Stratified by Body Mass Index for the Direct Anterior Approach to Total Hip Arthroplasty.围手术期并发症按体重指数分层的全髋关节置换术直接前入路。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Sep;35(9):2652-2657. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.018. Epub 2020 Apr 11.
7
Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With High Attrition Rate and Mortality.初次全髋关节或全膝关节置换术后假体周围感染行二期翻修术与高损耗率和高死亡率相关。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1384-1389. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.005. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
8
Surgical approach significantly affects the complication rates associated with total hip arthroplasty.手术入路显著影响全髋关节置换术相关并发症的发生率。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6):646-651. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1474.R1.
9
2019 Frank Stinchfield Award: A comparison of prosthetic joint infection rates between direct anterior and non-anterior approach total hip arthroplasty.2019 年 Frank Stinchfield 奖:直接前侧入路与非前侧入路全髋关节置换术的假体关节感染率比较。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6_Supple_B):2-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-0786.R1.
10
Cementless short-stem total hip arthroplasty in the elderly patient - is it a safe option?: a prospective multicentre observational study.骨水泥型非骨水泥短柄全髋关节置换术在老年患者中的应用-这是一种安全的选择吗?:一项前瞻性多中心观察研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Apr 17;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1123-1.