Rummel R J
University of Hawaii.
Behav Sci. 1987 Oct;32(4):241-66. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830320402.
Macro social field theory has undergone extensive development and testing since the 1960s. One of these has been the articulation of an appropriate conceptual micro model--called the conflict helix--for understanding the process from conflict to cooperation and vice versa. Conflict and cooperation are viewed as distinct equilibria of forces in a social field; the movement between these equilibria is a jump, energized by a gap between social expectations and power, and triggered by some minor event. Quite independently, there also has been much recent application of catastrophe theory to social behavior, but usually without a clear substantive theory and lacking empirical testing. This paper uses catastrophe theory--namely, the butterfly model--mathematically to structure the conflict helix. The social field framework and helix provide the substantive interpretation for the catastrophe theory; and catastrophe theory provides a suitable mathematical model for the conflict helix. The model is tested on the annual conflict and cooperation between India and Pakistan, 1948 to 1973. The results are generally positive and encouraging.
自20世纪60年代以来,宏观社会场理论经历了广泛的发展和检验。其中之一是阐述了一种合适的概念微观模型——称为冲突螺旋——用于理解从冲突到合作以及反之亦然的过程。冲突与合作被视为社会场中不同的力量平衡;这些平衡之间的运动是一种跳跃,由社会期望与权力之间的差距激发,并由某个小事件引发。完全独立地,近期灾变理论也大量应用于社会行为,但通常没有明确的实质性理论且缺乏实证检验。本文运用灾变理论——即蝴蝶模型——从数学上构建冲突螺旋。社会场框架和螺旋为灾变理论提供了实质性解释;而灾变理论为冲突螺旋提供了合适的数学模型。该模型在1948年至1973年印度与巴基斯坦的年度冲突与合作上进行了检验。结果总体上是积极且令人鼓舞的。