• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

麻醉学患者交接教育干预措施:系统评价。

Anesthesiology Patient Handoff Education Interventions: A Systematic Review.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Aug;49(8):394-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.12.002
PMID:36631352
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anesthesiology provider handoffs are complex, occur frequently, and have been associated with adverse patient outcomes. The authors sought to determine the degree to which anesthesiology handoff studies with educational interventions incorporated tenets of educational best practices.

METHODS

The research team conducted a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature focused on handoff studies with education interventions that included anesthesiology providers. Searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, and ERIC (2010-September 2021). Each phase of the article review process included at least two trained independent reviewers. In addition, pairs of trained reviewers abstracted study characteristics RESULTS: Twenty-six articles met inclusion criteria. Two thirds (18/26; 69.2%) were published after 2017, and almost three fourths (19/26; 73.1%) included learners. Education intervention descriptions varied, with only 15.4% (4/26) briefly mentioning education theory, 7.7% (2/26) with clear education objectives, and 7.7% (2/26) assessing curriculum via participant satisfaction. Most (22/26; 84.6%) assessed Kirkpatrick's level 3 (handoff behavior change), and 26.9% (7/26) assessed level 4b (patient outcomes). Medical education quality scores were low (range 6-24, mean 11.3; max 32), with more than half (15/26; 57.7%) receiving scores ≤ 10.

CONCLUSION

Educational interventions demonstrate marked heterogeneity in the use of educational theoretical concepts and established curriculum development best practices. Future studies should report on important aspects of educational interventions, which would allow for comparison across studies, yield the essential data needed to identify handoff education best practices, and improve patient safety.

摘要

背景

麻醉学提供者交接复杂,频繁发生,并与不良患者结局相关。作者试图确定在包含教育最佳实践原则的教育干预措施的麻醉学交接研究中,这一程度如何。

方法

研究小组对专注于交接研究的同行评审文献进行了系统回顾,这些研究包括了麻醉学提供者的教育干预措施。使用 PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane 和 ERIC(2010 年-2021 年 9 月)进行了搜索。文章审查过程的每个阶段都至少有两名经过培训的独立审查员参与。此外,经过培训的审查员成对地提取研究特征。

结果

26 篇文章符合纳入标准。三分之二(18/26;69.2%)发表于 2017 年之后,近四分之三(19/26;73.1%)包括学习者。教育干预措施的描述各不相同,只有 15.4%(4/26)简要提及教育理论,7.7%(2/26)有明确的教育目标,7.7%(2/26)通过参与者满意度评估课程。大多数(22/26;84.6%)评估了柯克帕特里克的第 3 级(交接行为改变),26.9%(7/26)评估了第 4b 级(患者结局)。医学教育质量评分较低(范围 6-24,平均值 11.3;最大值 32),超过一半(15/26;57.7%)的评分≤10。

结论

教育干预措施在使用教育理论概念和既定课程开发最佳实践方面存在显著的异质性。未来的研究应报告教育干预措施的重要方面,这将允许在研究之间进行比较,产生确定交接教育最佳实践所需的必要数据,并提高患者安全。

相似文献

1
Anesthesiology Patient Handoff Education Interventions: A Systematic Review.麻醉学患者交接教育干预措施:系统评价。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Aug;49(8):394-409. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.12.002. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
How does training in anesthesia residency shape residents' approaches to patient care handoffs? A single-center qualitative interview study.麻醉住院医师培训如何塑造住院医师对患者交接的处理方式?一项单中心定性访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 20;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1387-8.
4
Handoff Education Interventions: A Scoping Review Focused on Sustaining Improvements.交接教育干预措施:一项关注持续改进的范围综述。
Am J Med Qual. 2024;39(5):229-243. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000204. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
5
Anesthesiology Handoff Simulation Case: A Handoff From Intensive Care Unit to Operating Room for Anesthesiology Learners.麻醉学交接模拟病例:针对麻醉学学员的从重症监护病房到手术室的交接
MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Mar 13;16:10887. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10887.
6
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
7
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Targeting improvements in patient safety at a large academic center: an institutional handoff curriculum for graduate medical education.以大型学术中心的患者安全改进为目标:研究生医学教育的机构交接课程。
Acad Med. 2014 Oct;89(10):1366-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000462.
10
Nursing handoff education: An integrative literature review.护理交接班教育:一项综合文献综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Mar;68:103570. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103570. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Preclinical Elective on Medical Student Performance on an Anesthesiology Simulation Scenario.临床前选修课对医学生在麻醉学模拟场景中表现的影响。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2025 Jul 19;16:1229-1238. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S516942. eCollection 2025.
2
Handoff Mnemonics Used in Perioperative Handoff Intervention Studies: A Systematic Review.围手术期交接干预研究中使用的交接助记符:一项系统综述。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Nov 26. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007261.
3
Handoffs and the challenges to implementing teamwork training in the perioperative environment.
围手术期环境中的交接班以及实施团队协作培训所面临的挑战。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 15;14:1187262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1187262. eCollection 2023.
4
Improving Perioperative Handoffs: Moving Beyond Standardized Checklists and Protocols.改善围手术期交接:超越标准化清单和协议
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Aug;49(8):341-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 22.