Soni Abhishek, Jadhav Ganesh K, Manocha Sapna, Chauhan Sunil, Goswami Brijesh, Verma Monica
Department of Radiation Oncology, PT Bhagwat Dayal Sharma, Rohtak, India.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022 Dec 29;27(6):1001-1009. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0116. eCollection 2022.
The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate an efficacy and toxicity profile of hypofractionated radiotherapy (67.5 Gy in 25 fractions) to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (78 Gy in 39 fractions) in prostate cancer patients with intermediate and high-risk disease.
From January 2015 to December 2018, 168 patients were randomized to hypofractionated radiation treatment and conventional fractionated radiation treatment schedules of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the prostate and seminal vesicles. All the patients also received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy started after ADT.
The median (range) follow-up was 51 (31-63) and 53 (33-64) months in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated regimes, respectively. The 3-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) rates were 86.9% and 73.8% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated groups, respectively (p = 0.032, significant). The 3-year bNED rates in patients at a high risk [i.e., pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) > 20 ng/mL, Gleason score ≥ 8, or T ≥ 2 c], were 87.9% and 73.5% (p = 0.007, significant) in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for late toxicity between the two groups, with 3-year grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity rates of 19% and 16.7% and 3-year grade 2 genitourinary toxicity rates of 15.5% and 11.9% in the hypofractionated and conventionally fractionated radiotherapy groups, respectively.
Hypofractionated schedule is superior to the conventional fractionation schedule of radiation treatment in terms of bNED in intermediate and high grade prostate cancer patients. Also, the late toxicity is found to be equivalent between the two treatment groups.
本研究的目的是比较评估大分割放疗(25次分割,总剂量67.5 Gy)与常规分割放疗(39次分割,总剂量78 Gy)对中高危前列腺癌患者的疗效和毒性特征。
2015年1月至2018年12月,168例患者被随机分配接受前列腺和精囊的容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)的大分割放疗和常规分割放疗方案。所有患者均接受雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT),放疗在ADT开始后进行。
大分割放疗组和常规分割放疗组的中位(范围)随访时间分别为51(31 - 63)个月和53(33 - 64)个月。大分割放疗组和常规分割放疗组的3年无生化疾病证据(bNED)率分别为86.9%和73.8%(p = 0.032,具有显著性)。高危患者(即治疗前前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)> 20 ng/mL、Gleason评分≥8或T≥2 c)的大分割放疗组和常规分割放疗组的3年bNED率分别为87.9%和73.5%(p = 0.007,具有显著性)。两组之间的晚期毒性无统计学显著差异,大分割放疗组和常规分割放疗组的3年2级胃肠道毒性发生率分别为19%和16.7%,3年2级泌尿生殖系统毒性发生率分别为15.5%和11.9%。
在中高危前列腺癌患者中,大分割放疗方案在bNED方面优于常规分割放疗方案。此外,发现两组的晚期毒性相当。