Department of Graduate Studies in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Associated Universities: Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Feb;46(3):414-428. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2165731. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
Systematically evaluate the comparative effectiveness of dry needling (DN) or local acupuncture to various types of wet needling (WN) for musculoskeletal pain disorders (MPD).
Seven databases (PubMed, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched following PROSPERO registration. Randomized clinical trials were included if they compared DN or local acupuncture with WN for MPD. Primary outcomes were pain and/or disability. The Revised Cochrane Collaboration tool (RoB 2.0) assessed the risk of bias.
Twenty-six studies were selected. Wet Needling types included cortisone (CSI) ( = 5), platelet-rich plasma (PRP) ( = 6), Botox (BoT) ( = 3), and local anesthetic injection (LAI) ( = 12). Evidence was rated as low to moderate quality. Results indicate DN produces similar effects to CSI in the short-medium term and superior outcomes in the long term. In addition, DN produces similar outcomes compared to PRP in the short and long term and similar outcomes as BoT in the short and medium term; however, LAI produces better pain outcomes in the short term.
Evidence suggests the effectiveness of DN to WN injections is variable depending on the injection type, outcome time frame, and diagnosis. In addition, adverse event data were similar but inconsistently reported. 2019 CRD42019131826Implications for rehabilitationDry needling produces similar effects for pain and disability in the short and medium term compared to cortisone, Botox, and platelet-rich plasma injections. Local anesthetic injection may be more effective at reducing short-term pain.Long-term effects on pain and disability are similar between dry needling and platelet-rich plasma injections, but dry needling may produce better long-term outcomes than cortisone injections.The available adverse event data is similar between dry and wet needling.The conclusions from this study may be beneficial for patients and clinicians for considering risk and cost benefit analyses.
系统评估干针(DN)或局部针刺与各种类型的湿式针刺(WN)治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛障碍(MPD)的比较效果。
按照 PROSPERO 注册,在 7 个数据库(PubMed、PEDro、SPORTDiscus、CINAHL、Scopus、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册)中进行搜索。如果比较 DN 或局部针刺与 WN 治疗 MPD 的随机临床试验,则纳入研究。主要结局为疼痛和/或残疾。使用修订后的 Cochrane 协作工具(RoB 2.0)评估偏倚风险。
选择了 26 项研究。WN 类型包括皮质类固醇(CSI)( = 5)、富含血小板的血浆(PRP)( = 6)、肉毒杆菌毒素(BoT)( = 3)和局部麻醉注射(LAI)( = 12)。证据质量评定为低至中度。结果表明,DN 在中短期产生与 CSI 相似的效果,在长期产生更好的效果。此外,DN 在短期和长期与 PRP 产生相似的效果,在短期和中期与 BoT 产生相似的效果;然而,LAI 在短期产生更好的疼痛效果。
证据表明,DN 与 WN 注射的有效性取决于注射类型、结果时间框架和诊断。此外,不良事件数据相似,但报告不一致。2019 年 CRD42019131826 康复意义干针在短期和中期对疼痛和残疾的效果与皮质类固醇、肉毒杆菌毒素和富含血小板的血浆注射相似。局部麻醉注射可能在减轻短期疼痛方面更有效。干针和富含血小板的血浆注射在长期对疼痛和残疾的影响相似,但干针可能比皮质类固醇注射产生更好的长期效果。干针和湿针的不良事件数据相似。本研究的结论可能对患者和临床医生有帮助,以便进行风险和成本效益分析。