Suppr超能文献

不同视野角度的高清结肠镜腺瘤检出率比较:170 度与 140 度。

Comparison of adenoma detection rate between high-definition colonoscopes with different fields of view: 170 degrees versus 140 degrees.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jan 13;102(2):e32675. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032675.

Abstract

In newer generation colonoscopes, the field of view (FOV) varies approximately between 170° and 140°, depending on the type of colonoscopy. To the best of our knowledge, no study has investigated whether the visual field difference of the colonoscope affects quality indicators, such as the adenoma detection rate (ADR), without using additional devices to expand the FOV in colonoscopes with the same resolution. This study aimed to investigate the difference in quality indicators, such as ADR, between 170° and 140° FOV in colonoscopes with the same high-definition resolution. We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent screening or surveillance colonoscopy at the Dong-A University Hospital in Busan, South Korea, between March 2021 and February 2022. We calculated the overall ADR ratios for patients who underwent colonoscopy with 140° and 170° FOV. Polyp detection rate (PDR), sessile serrated PDR, and advanced neoplasia detection rate were calculated for each group. Factors associated with adenoma detection were identified using a logistical regression analysis. A total of 1711 patients were included in the study (838 patients in the 170° group and 873 patients in the 140° group). ADR (43.79 vs 41.92%, P = .434) did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. The generational differences were not statistically significant either for PDR (56.44 vs 53.49%, P = .220), sessile serrated PDR (1.19 vs 0.92%, P = .575), or advanced neoplasia detection rate (5.00 vs 4.58%, P = .735). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that, age, male sex, and long withdrawal time were the most significant factors affecting adenoma detection. This study revealed that there were no differences in ADR while employing high definition colonoscopes with a 170° FOV and a 140° FOV.

摘要

在新一代结肠镜中,视场(FOV)因结肠镜类型而异,大约在 170°至 140°之间。据我们所知,尚无研究调查结肠镜 FOV 的差异是否会影响质量指标,例如腺瘤检出率(ADR),而无需使用额外的设备来扩展具有相同分辨率的结肠镜的 FOV。本研究旨在调查在具有相同高清分辨率的结肠镜中,170°和 140° FOV 之间的质量指标(如 ADR)差异。我们回顾性分析了 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 2 月期间在韩国釜山东亚大学医院接受筛查或监测结肠镜检查的患者的病历。我们计算了接受 140°和 170° FOV 结肠镜检查的患者的总体 ADR 比值。计算了每组的息肉检出率(PDR)、无蒂锯齿状息肉检出率和高级别肿瘤检出率。使用逻辑回归分析确定与腺瘤检出相关的因素。共有 1711 名患者纳入研究(170°组 838 名,140°组 873 名)。两组之间 ADR(43.79%对 41.92%,P=.434)无显著差异。两组之间 PDR(56.44%对 53.49%,P=.220)、无蒂锯齿状息肉检出率(1.19%对 0.92%,P=.575)或高级别肿瘤检出率(5.00%对 4.58%,P=.735)也无统计学差异。多变量回归分析显示,年龄、男性和较长的退出时间是影响腺瘤检出的最重要因素。本研究表明,在使用具有 170° FOV 和 140° FOV 的高清结肠镜时,ADR 没有差异。

相似文献

2
Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2756-2762. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06543-5. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
New-Generation High-Definition Colonoscopes Increase Adenoma Detection when Screening a Moderate-Risk Population for Colorectal Cancer.
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Mar;16(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
5
Effect of dynamic position changes during colonoscope withdrawal: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Mar;35(3):1171-1181. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07483-x. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
6
8
High-definition colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):78-84. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4986-7. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
9
Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;54(4):471-477. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1597158. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
10
Adenoma detection rate in high-risk patients differs from that in average-risk patients.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jan;83(1):172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.04.019. Epub 2015 May 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Latest Generation High-Definition Colonoscopy Increases Adenoma Detection Rate by Trainee Endoscopists.
Dig Dis Sci. 2021 Aug;66(8):2756-2762. doi: 10.1007/s10620-020-06543-5. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
3
4
Compared Abilities of Endoscopic Techniques to Increase Colon Adenoma Detection Rates: A Network Meta-analysis.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov;17(12):2439-2454.e25. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.11.058. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
World Endoscopy Organization Consensus Statements on Post-Colonoscopy and Post-Imaging Colorectal Cancer.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):909-925.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.038. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
8
Inadequate Boston Bowel Preparation Scale scores predict the risk of missed neoplasia on the next colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar;87(3):744-751. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.06.012. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
9
Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jul;86(1):18-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验