Suppr超能文献

巴瑞替尼或伊马替尼用于住院的新冠肺炎患者:探索性随机临床试验COVINIB的结果

Baricitinib or imatinib in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Results from COVINIB, an exploratory randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Morales-Ortega Alejandro, Farfán-Sedano Ana Isabel, San Martín-López Juan Víctor, Escribá-Bárcena Almudena, Jaenes-Barrios Beatriz, Madroñal-Cerezo Elena, Llarena-Barroso Cristina, Mesa-Plaza Nieves, Frutos-Pérez Begoña, Ruiz-Giardín José Manuel, Duarte-Millán Miguel Ángel, Piedrabuena-García Sara Isabel, Carpintero-García Lorena, Canalejo-Castrillero Eduardo, Mora-Hernández Belén, García-Parra Carlos Javier, Magro-García Héctor Agustín, Algaba-García Alicia, Hernández-Muniesa Belén, Nasarre-López Berta, Ontañón-Nasarre Ana, Domínguez-García María Jesús, Gómez-Santos Dulce, Prieto-Menchero Santiago, García de Tena Jaime, Bermejo Fernando, García-Gil Mario, Gonzalo-Pascua Sonia, Bernal-Bello David

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Medicine, Universidad de Alcalá, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Med Virol. 2023 Feb;95(2):e28495. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28495.

Abstract

Baricitinib and imatinib are considered therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but their ultimate clinical impact remains to be elucidated, so our objective is to determine whether these kinase inhibitors provide benefit when added to standard care in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Phase-2, open-label, randomized trial with a pick-the-winner design conducted from September 2020 to June 2021 in a single Spanish center. Hospitalized adults with COVID-19 pneumonia and a symptom duration ≤10 days were assigned to 3 arms: imatinib (400 mg qd, 7 days) plus standard-care, baricitinib (4 mg qd, 7 days) plus standard-care, or standard-care alone. Primary outcome was time to clinical improvement (discharge alive or a reduction of 2 points in an ordinal scale of clinical status) compared on a day-by-day basis to identify differences ≥15% between the most and least favorable groups. Secondary outcomes included oxygenation and ventilatory support requirements, additional therapies administered, all-cause mortality, and safety. One hundred and sixty-five patients analyzed. Predefined criteria for selection of the most advantageous arm were met for baricitinib, but not for imatinib. However, no statistically significant differences were observed in formal analysis, but a trend toward better results in patients receiving baricitinib was found compared to standard care alone (hazard ratio [HR] for clinical improvement: 1.41, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.96-2.06; HR for discontinuing oxygen: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.94-2.28). No differences were found regarding additional therapies administered or safety. Baricitinib plus standard care showed better results for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, being the most advantageous therapeutic strategy among those proposed in this exploratory clinical trial.

摘要

巴瑞替尼和伊马替尼被视为治疗2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疗法,但其最终临床影响仍有待阐明,因此我们的目标是确定这些激酶抑制剂在添加到住院COVID-19患者的标准治疗中时是否有益。这是一项于2020年9月至2021年6月在西班牙一个中心进行的2期开放标签随机试验,采用胜者全得设计。患有COVID-19肺炎且症状持续时间≤10天的住院成人被分为3组:伊马替尼(400毫克,每日一次,共7天)加标准治疗、巴瑞替尼(4毫克,每日一次,共7天)加标准治疗或仅接受标准治疗。主要结局是临床改善时间(存活出院或临床状态序数评分降低2分),每天进行比较以确定最有利组和最不利组之间的差异≥15%。次要结局包括氧合和通气支持需求、额外给予的治疗、全因死亡率和安全性。共分析了165例患者。巴瑞替尼符合选择最有利治疗组的预定义标准,而伊马替尼不符合。然而,在正式分析中未观察到统计学显著差异,但与仅接受标准治疗相比,接受巴瑞替尼治疗的患者有取得更好结果的趋势(临床改善的风险比[HR]:1.41,95%置信区间[CI]:0.96 - 2.06;停止吸氧的HR:1.46,95%CI:0.94 - 2.28)。在额外给予的治疗或安全性方面未发现差异。巴瑞替尼加标准治疗对住院COVID-19患者显示出更好的结果,是该探索性临床试验中提出的治疗策略中最有利的一种。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验