• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在干旱梯度上区分优势物种的特征与那些对土壤湿度有响应的特征不同。

Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture.

作者信息

Griffin-Nolan Robert J, Felton Andrew J, Slette Ingrid J, Smith Melinda D, Knapp Alan K

机构信息

Department of Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.

Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2023 Feb;201(2):311-322. doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y. Epub 2023 Jan 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y
PMID:36640197
Abstract

Many plant traits respond to changes in water availability and might be useful for understanding ecosystem properties such as net primary production (NPP). This is especially evident in grasslands where NPP is water-limited and primarily determined by the traits of dominant species. We measured root and shoot morphology, leaf hydraulic traits, and NPP of four dominant North American prairie grasses in response to four levels of soil moisture in a greenhouse experiment. We expected that traits of species from drier regions would be more responsive to reduced water availability and that this would make these species more resistant to low soil moisture than species from wetter regions. All four species grew taller, produced more biomass, and increased total root length in wetter treatments. Each species reduced its leaf turgor loss point (TLP) in drier conditions, but only two species (one xeric, one mesic) maintained leaf water potential above TLP. We identified a suite of traits that clearly distinguished species from one another, but, surprisingly, these traits were relatively unresponsive to reduced soil moisture. Specifically, more xeric species produced thinner roots with higher specific root length and had a lower root mass fraction. This suggest that root traits are critical for distinguishing species from one another but might not respond strongly to changing water availability, though this warrants further investigation in the field. Overall, we found that NPP of these dominant grass species responded similarly to varying levels of soil moisture despite differences in species morphology, physiology, and habitat of origin.

摘要

许多植物性状会对水分可利用性的变化做出响应,可能有助于理解诸如净初级生产力(NPP)等生态系统属性。这在草原地区尤为明显,那里的NPP受水分限制,且主要由优势物种的性状决定。在一项温室实验中,我们测量了北美四种优势草原草的根和地上部分形态、叶片水力性状以及NPP,以响应四种土壤湿度水平。我们预计,来自较干旱地区的物种性状对水分可利用性降低的响应会更强,并且这会使这些物种比来自较湿润地区的物种更能抵抗低土壤湿度。在较湿润的处理条件下,所有四个物种都长得更高、产生了更多生物量并且总根长增加。在较干旱条件下,每个物种都降低了其叶片膨压损失点(TLP),但只有两个物种(一个旱生的,一个中生的)保持叶片水势高于TLP。我们确定了一组能明显区分物种的性状,但令人惊讶的是,这些性状对土壤湿度降低的响应相对较小。具体而言,更旱生的物种产生更细的根,具有更高的比根长且根质量分数较低。这表明根性状对于区分物种至关重要,但可能对变化的水分可利用性反应不强,不过这有待在野外进一步研究。总体而言,我们发现尽管这些优势草种在形态、生理和起源生境方面存在差异,但它们的NPP对不同水平的土壤湿度的响应相似。

相似文献

1
Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture.在干旱梯度上区分优势物种的特征与那些对土壤湿度有响应的特征不同。
Oecologia. 2023 Feb;201(2):311-322. doi: 10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
2
Above- and below-ground plant traits are not consistent in response to drought and competition treatments.地上和地下植物特性对干旱和竞争处理的响应不一致。
Ann Bot. 2022 Dec 31;130(7):939-950. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcac108.
3
Plant response traits mediate the effects of subalpine grasslands on soil moisture.植物响应特征介导了亚高山草原对土壤水分的影响。
New Phytol. 2008;180(3):652-662. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02577.x. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
4
Plant traits and soil fertility mediate productivity losses under extreme drought in C grasslands.植物特性和土壤肥力在 C 草原极端干旱下调节生产力损失。
Ecology. 2021 Oct;102(10):e03465. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3465. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
5
Trading water for carbon in the future: Effects of elevated CO and warming on leaf hydraulic traits in a semiarid grassland.未来用水分换碳汇:CO 升高和变暖对半干旱草原叶片水力特征的影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Oct;28(20):5991-6001. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16314. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
6
Response of millet and sorghum to a varying water supply around the primary and nodal roots.谷子和高粱对主根和节根周围变水供应的响应。
Ann Bot. 2013 Jul;112(2):439-46. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct099. Epub 2013 Jun 7.
7
Response of dominant grass and shrub species to water manipulation: an ecophysiological basis for shrub invasion in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland.优势草本和灌木物种对水分管理的响应:奇瓦瓦沙漠草原灌丛入侵的生理生态学基础。
Oecologia. 2012 Jun;169(2):373-83. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-2217-4. Epub 2011 Dec 11.
8
Root vascular traits differ systematically between African savanna tree and grass species, with implications for water use.非洲稀树草原的树木和草类物种之间,根部维管特征存在系统性差异,这对水分利用有影响。
Am J Bot. 2021 Jan;108(1):83-90. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1597. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
Phenotypic plasticity as an index of drought tolerance in three Patagonian steppe grasses.表型可塑性作为三种巴塔哥尼亚草原草抗旱性的指标。
Ann Bot. 2012 Sep;110(4):849-57. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcs147. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
10
Does reduced precipitation trigger physiological and morphological drought adaptations in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)? Comparing provenances across a precipitation gradient.降水减少是否会引发欧洲山毛榉(Fagus sylvatica L.)的生理和形态干旱适应性?比较不同种源在降水梯度上的情况。
Tree Physiol. 2015 Sep;35(9):949-63. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpv057. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Microclimatic Influences on Soil Nitrogen Dynamics and Plant Diversity Across Rocky Desertification Gradients in Southwest China.中国西南地区石漠化梯度上微气候对土壤氮动态和植物多样性的影响
Plants (Basel). 2025 Apr 20;14(8):1251. doi: 10.3390/plants14081251.

本文引用的文献

1
Traits explain sorting of C grasses along a global precipitation gradient.性状解释了C4禾本科植物在全球降水梯度上的分布情况。
Ecol Evol. 2021 Feb 3;11(6):2669-2680. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7223. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Plant traits are differentially linked to performance in a semiarid ecosystem.植物特性与半干旱生态系统中的表现存在差异关联。
Ecology. 2021 May;102(5):e03318. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3318. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
3
Is a drought a drought in grasslands? Productivity responses to different types of drought.草原干旱是否为干旱?不同类型干旱对生产力的响应。
Oecologia. 2021 Dec;197(4):1017-1026. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04793-8. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
Root traits as drivers of plant and ecosystem functioning: current understanding, pitfalls and future research needs.根系性状作为植物和生态系统功能的驱动因素:当前的认识、陷阱与未来研究需求
New Phytol. 2021 Nov;232(3):1123-1158. doi: 10.1111/nph.17072. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
5
Resolving the Dust Bowl paradox of grassland responses to extreme drought.解决草原对极端干旱响应的“尘暴悖论”。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 8;117(36):22249-22255. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1922030117. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
6
Sensitivity of primary production to precipitation across the United States.美国各地初级生产力对降水的敏感性。
Ecol Lett. 2020 Mar;23(3):527-536. doi: 10.1111/ele.13455. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
7
Plant growth and aboveground production respond differently to late-season deluges in a semi-arid grassland.在半干旱草原,植物生长和地上生物量对季末暴雨的响应不同。
Oecologia. 2019 Nov;191(3):673-683. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04515-9. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Demystifying dominant species.解析优势物种。
New Phytol. 2019 Aug;223(3):1106-1126. doi: 10.1111/nph.15789. Epub 2019 May 4.
9
Seedling traits predict drought-induced mortality linked to diversity loss.幼苗特征可预测与物种多样性丧失有关的干旱诱导死亡率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 19;116(12):5576-5581. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818543116. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
10
Extending the osmometer method for assessing drought tolerance in herbaceous species.扩展渗透压测定法以评估草本植物的耐旱性。
Oecologia. 2019 Feb;189(2):353-363. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04336-w. Epub 2019 Jan 9.