Suppr超能文献

神经妥乐平治疗伴有腰痛的腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效

Clinical Efficacy of Neurotropin for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Low Back Pain.

作者信息

Eguchi Yawara, Aoki Yasuchika, Yamashita Masaomi, Fujimoto Kazuki, Sato Takashi, Abe Koki, Sato Masashi, Yamanaka Hajime, Toyoguchi Toru, Shimizu Keisuke, Orita Sumihisa, Inage Kazuhide, Shiga Yasuhiro, Ohtori Seiji

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Orthopaedic Science Medical Innovation, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shimoshizu National Hospital, 934-5, Shikawatashi, Yotsukaido, Chiba, 284-0003, Japan.

出版信息

Pain Ther. 2023 Apr;12(2):461-473. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00472-z. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared the clinical effects of Neurotropin, limaprost alfadex, and a combination of both drugs for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with low back pain (LBP).

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, randomized, active-controlled, open-label trial from March 2021 to May 2022. Participants were patients diagnosed with LSS by MRI and were randomly assigned to three groups: Neurotropin/limaprost combination (NL group), Neurotropin (N group), and limaprost group (L group). Participants received the drugs administered orally for 12 weeks, and each examination and observation was performed before any drug administration and every 2 weeks thereafter. We recorded age, sex, height, weight, duration of symptoms, intermittent claudication distance, level of stenosis in MRI, and concomitant analgesics as examination items in the trial period. Items measured during the trial were visual analog scale (VAS) score (mm) for LBP, leg pain and numbness, walking activity (walking speed, stride length), standing balance (3 m Timed Up-and-Go (TUG) Test results, Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSST) results), LBP/Quality of Life (QOL)-related scores (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Euro QOL 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)), psychological factors (Pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) and Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) scores), and adverse events. Each item was evaluated using changes at each visit (weeks 2-12) from baseline value before drug administration (week 0), and changes were considered significant when p < 0.05.

RESULTS

We included results from 64 patients in the present study; 24 were assigned to the NL group (mean age 71.2 years), 20 to the N group (mean age 76.2 years), and 20 to the L group (mean age 74.4 years). There were no significant differences between the three groups in patient characteristics, concomitant analgesics, or baseline VAS score, gait balance, or QOL-related scores (p ≥ 0.05). The VAS and leg pain scores were significantly improved in Group L, and LBP was improved significantly in Group N. QOL and ODI scores improved significantly in the NL and L groups, EQ-5D score improved significantly in the L group, and RDQ score improved significantly in all groups (p < 0.05). Psychological factor and PCS scores improved significantly in the NL and L groups (p < 0.05). Walking speed and stride length were improved significantly in the NL and N groups (p < 0.05). TUG/FTSST scores were improved significantly in all groups (p < 0.05). Leg pain VAS score was improved significantly (p < 0.05) in the L group compared with the NL group after 6 and 12 weeks of administration, and LBP VAS was improved significantly in the N group after 6 weeks compared with the NL group (p < 0.05). Walking speed was significantly improved in the NL group after 2 weeks compared with the N group and improved significantly in the NL group after 6 weeks (p < 0.05) compared with the L group. RDQ was decreased significantly in the L group compared with the NL group after 8 weeks (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined use of Neurotropin and limaprost showed an additional effect on walking speed compared with single drug administration. Neurotropin may contribute to the improvement of low back pain, walking speed/stride length, and standing balance.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs031200282).

摘要

目的

我们比较了神经妥乐平、利马前列素 alfadex 以及这两种药物联合使用对伴有下腰痛(LBP)的腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的临床疗效。

方法

我们在2021年3月至2022年5月期间进行了一项多中心、随机、活性对照、开放标签试验。参与者为经磁共振成像(MRI)诊断为LSS的患者,并被随机分为三组:神经妥乐平/利马前列素联合组(NL组)、神经妥乐平组(N组)和利马前列素组(L组)。参与者口服药物12周,在给药前及给药后每2周进行各项检查和观察。我们记录了年龄、性别、身高、体重、症状持续时间、间歇性跛行距离、MRI上的狭窄程度以及试验期间作为检查项目的伴随使用的镇痛药。试验期间测量的项目包括下腰痛、腿痛和麻木的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分(毫米)、步行活动(步行速度、步幅)、站立平衡(3米定时起立行走(TUG)测试结果、五次坐立试验(FTSST)结果)、下腰痛/生活质量(QOL)相关评分(Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)、欧洲五维健康量表5级(EQ-5D-5L)、罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RDQ))、心理因素(疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)和疼痛自我效能问卷(PSEQ)评分)以及不良事件。每个项目使用给药前(第0周)基线值与每次随访(第2 - 12周)的变化进行评估,当p < 0.05时,变化被认为具有显著性。

结果

本研究纳入了64例患者的结果;24例被分配到NL组(平均年龄71.2岁),20例到N组(平均年龄76.2岁),20例到L组(平均年龄74.4岁)。三组在患者特征、伴随使用的镇痛药或基线VAS评分、步态平衡或QOL相关评分方面无显著差异(p≥0.05)。L组的VAS和腿痛评分显著改善,N组的下腰痛显著改善。NL组和L组的QOL和ODI评分显著改善,L组的EQ-5D评分显著改善,所有组的RDQ评分均显著改善(p < 0.05)。NL组和L组的心理因素和PCS评分显著改善(p < 0.05)。NL组和N组的步行速度和步幅显著改善(p < 0.05)。所有组的TUG/FTSST评分均显著改善(p < 0.05)。给药6周和12周后,L组的腿痛VAS评分与NL组相比显著改善(p < 0.05),给药6周后,N组的下腰痛VAS评分与NL组相比显著改善(p < 0.05)。与N组相比,NL组在给药2周后步行速度显著改善,与L组相比,NL组在给药6周后步行速度显著改善(p < 0.05)。与NL组相比,L组在给药8周后RDQ显著降低(p < 0.05)。

结论

与单一药物给药相比,神经妥乐平和利马前列素联合使用对步行速度有额外的效果。神经妥乐平可能有助于改善下腰痛、步行速度/步幅和站立平衡。

试验注册

日本临床试验注册中心(jRCTs031200282)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c842/10036710/41c6fe088604/40122_2022_472_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验