Grover Sandeep, Adarsh Himani
Department of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Department of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2023 Mar;81:103439. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2022.103439. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
There is a lack of data on the mixed specifier from developing countries like India.
In this background, the present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of "mixed specifier" in patients with unipolar depression and bipolar depression. The additional aim was to evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical correlates of the mixed specifier.
110 patients (51 diagnosed with current episode unipolar depression and 59 diagnosed with current episode bipolar depression) were evaluated on DSM-5 criteria for mixed specifier for depression, Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale, Koukopoulos Mixed Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton depression rating scale (HDRS) and Young mania rating scale.
According to DSM-5, 11 (21.56%) out of the 51 patients with unipolar depression fulfilled at least 3 out of the 7 criteria for the mixed specifier for depression, and 14 (23.72%) out of 59 patients with bipolar depression fulfilled the criteria for the mixed specifier, with no significant difference in the prevalence across the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the sociodemographic and clinical profile of those with and without mixed features in both unipolar and bipolar depression groups. However, those with mixed and without mixed features differ on certain depressive symptoms as assessed on HDRS.
About one-fifth of patients with unipolar and bipolar depression have mixed features during the acute phase of depression.
像印度这样的发展中国家缺乏关于混合说明符的数据。
在此背景下,本研究旨在评估单相抑郁症和双相抑郁症患者中“混合说明符”的患病率。另一个目的是评估混合说明符的社会人口学和临床相关性。
根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版中抑郁症混合说明符的标准、临床有用的抑郁结果量表、库科波洛斯混合抑郁评定量表、汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS)和杨氏躁狂评定量表,对110例患者(51例被诊断为当前发作的单相抑郁症,59例被诊断为当前发作的双相抑郁症)进行评估。
根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版,51例单相抑郁症患者中有11例(21.56%)至少符合抑郁症混合说明符7项标准中的3项,59例双相抑郁症患者中有14例(23.72%)符合混合说明符标准,两组患病率无显著差异。单相和双相抑郁症组中具有和不具有混合特征的患者在社会人口学和临床特征方面无显著差异。然而,根据HDRS评估,具有和不具有混合特征的患者在某些抑郁症状上存在差异。
约五分之一的单相和双相抑郁症患者在抑郁症急性期具有混合特征。