• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国的动脉压容积指数和心血管风险评分增加。

Increased arterial pressure volume index and cardiovascular risk score in China.

机构信息

Department of Ultrasound, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200052, China.

Department of Ultrasound, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, Shanxi, China.

出版信息

BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jan 16;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-03035-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12872-022-03035-4
PMID:36646995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9841629/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The new non-invasive arterial stiffness indices, arterial pressure volume index (API) is explored as a novel marker of residual stress in the wall of the peripheral muscular arteries at zero-stress state in clinical settings. The present study aimed to study the association of API with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in China (China-PAR).

METHODS

According to China-PAR score, participants were divided into three groups: low risk (< 5%), medium risk (5-9.9%), and high risk (≥ 10.0%). API ≥ 31 was defined as high API, and the incidences of high API were compared. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the risk factors of high API and high risk China-PAR categories. The association between China-PAR and API was analyzed by restrictive cubic spline.

RESULTS

The study included 4311 participants. After adjustments for confounding factors, high API was independent factor associated with high risk China-PAR categories, and the probability of high API was 1.366 times higher than that in normal API subjects. While, the independent factors associated with high API were BMI, blood pressure and heart rate. Furthermore, API had a significant U-shaped association with China-PAR. CVD risk was lowest with API of 19 units, the fastest increase at 26 units and the flattest starting point at 59 units.

CONCLUSION

API, an indicator of arterial stiffness and residual stress, had a U-shaped association with China-PAR score and might play an important role in predicting CVD risk in Chinese natural populations.

摘要

背景和目的

新的无创动脉僵硬度指数,动脉压力容积指数(API)被探索作为一种新的标记物,用于在零压力状态下评估外周肌性动脉壁的残余应力,这在临床环境中具有重要意义。本研究旨在探讨 API 与中国人群心血管疾病(CVD)风险(China-PAR)的相关性。

方法

根据 China-PAR 评分,将参与者分为三组:低危组(<5%)、中危组(5-9.9%)和高危组(≥10.0%)。API≥31 定义为高 API,比较高 API 的发生率。采用 Logistic 回归模型分析高 API 和高风险 China-PAR 类别的危险因素。采用限制性立方样条分析 China-PAR 与 API 的相关性。

结果

本研究共纳入 4311 名参与者。在调整混杂因素后,高 API 是与高危 China-PAR 类别的独立相关因素,高 API 受试者发生高风险 China-PAR 类别的概率是正常 API 受试者的 1.366 倍。而与高 API 相关的独立因素是 BMI、血压和心率。此外,API 与 China-PAR 呈显著 U 型关系。当 API 为 19 单位时,CVD 风险最低,当 API 为 26 单位时,风险增加最快,当 API 为 59 单位时,风险增加最平缓。

结论

API 是动脉僵硬度和残余应力的指标,与 China-PAR 评分呈 U 型关系,可能在预测中国自然人群 CVD 风险方面发挥重要作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29fd/9841629/8e49964a58d8/12872_2022_3035_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29fd/9841629/95affe611d80/12872_2022_3035_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29fd/9841629/8e49964a58d8/12872_2022_3035_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29fd/9841629/95affe611d80/12872_2022_3035_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29fd/9841629/8e49964a58d8/12872_2022_3035_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Increased arterial pressure volume index and cardiovascular risk score in China.中国的动脉压容积指数和心血管风险评分增加。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jan 16;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-03035-4.
2
Relationship of Arterial Stiffness and Central Hemodynamics With Cardiovascular Risk In Hypertension.高血压患者动脉僵硬度和中心血流动力学与心血管风险的关系
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Mar 15;36(4):201-208. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad005.
3
Association between novel arterial stiffness indices and risk factors of cardiovascular disease.新型动脉僵硬度指标与心血管疾病危险因素之间的关联。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 7;16(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0389-x.
4
Roles of arterial pressure volume index and arterial velocity pulse index trajectories in risk prediction in hypertensive patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.动脉血压容积指数和动脉速度脉搏指数轨迹在射血分数保留的心力衰竭高血压患者风险预测中的作用。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020 Jul 3;42(5):469-478. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2019.1705319. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Gender and age disparities in small-to-medium arterial stiffness among the Chinese population.中国人群中小到中等动脉僵硬度的性别和年龄差异。
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2023 Dec;33(12):2355-2362. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.08.006. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
6
Association of Arterial Stiffness Indices with Framingham Cardiovascular Disease Risk Score.动脉僵硬度指数与弗雷明汉心血管疾病风险评分的关联。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Aug 16;23(8):287. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2308287. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Unraveling Changes of Brachial Artery Residual Stress and Its Relationship to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors.揭示肱动脉残余应力的变化及其与心血管疾病危险因素的关系。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 16;25(8):289. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508289. eCollection 2024 Aug.
8
Relative contributions of arterial stiffness to cardiovascular disease risk score in Chinese women in framingham and China-PAR model.动脉僵硬度对中国女性心血管疾病风险评分的相对贡献:基于弗雷明汉模型和中国-PAR模型的研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 15;10:1169250. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1169250. eCollection 2023.
9
New indices of arterial stiffness correlate with disease severity and mid-term prognosis in acute decompensated heart failure.新的动脉僵硬度指标与急性失代偿性心力衰竭的疾病严重程度和中期预后相关。
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;16(3):661-668. doi: 10.1007/s11739-020-02486-x. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
10
Comparison of the clinical significance of single cuff-based arterial stiffness parameters with that of the commonly used parameters.基于单袖带的动脉僵硬度参数与常用参数的临床意义比较。
J Cardiol. 2017 Apr;69(4):678-683. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationship between different severity of COVID-19 pneumonia and arterial stiffness based on artificial intelligence analysis.基于人工智能分析的新型冠状病毒肺炎不同严重程度与动脉僵硬度之间的关系
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 29;12:1594570. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1594570. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparing the association of novel Anthropometric and atherogenicity indices with all-cause, cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular mortality in a general population of Iranian adults.比较新型人体测量学指标和致动脉粥样硬化性指标与伊朗成年普通人群全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和非心血管死亡率之间的关联。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jan 27;21:100936. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.100936. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Non-Invasive Assessment of Arterial Stiffness: Pulse Wave Velocity, Pulse Wave Analysis and Carotid Cross-Sectional Distensibility: Comparison between Methods.动脉僵硬度的非侵入性评估:脉搏波速度、脉搏波分析与颈动脉横截面积扩张性:方法比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 15;11(8):2225. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082225.
2
Validating World Health Organization cardiovascular disease risk charts and optimizing risk assessment in China.验证世界卫生组织心血管疾病风险评估图表并优化中国的风险评估
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Feb 5;8:100096. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100096. eCollection 2021 Mar.
3
Routine assessment of cognitive function in older patients with hypertension seen by primary care physicians: why and how-a decision-making support from the working group on 'hypertension and the brain' of the European Society of Hypertension and from the European Geriatric Medicine Society.
Association between myocardial layer-specific strain and high 10-year risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in hypertension-findings from the China-PAR project study.
高血压患者心肌层特异性应变与10年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病高风险的关联——中国PAR项目研究结果
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 3;11:1460826. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1460826. eCollection 2024.
4
Unraveling Changes of Brachial Artery Residual Stress and Its Relationship to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors.揭示肱动脉残余应力的变化及其与心血管疾病危险因素的关系。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 16;25(8):289. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508289. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
A Novel Index System for Assessing Ventricular-Vascular Coupling.一种用于评估心室-血管耦合的新型指标体系。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 8;24(10):282. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2410282. eCollection 2023 Oct.
6
Relative contributions of arterial stiffness to cardiovascular disease risk score in Chinese women in framingham and China-PAR model.动脉僵硬度对中国女性心血管疾病风险评分的相对贡献:基于弗雷明汉模型和中国-PAR模型的研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jun 15;10:1169250. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1169250. eCollection 2023.
基层医疗机构中老年高血压患者认知功能的常规评估:为何要评估及如何评估——来自欧洲高血压学会“高血压与大脑”工作组和欧洲老年医学学会的决策支持。
J Hypertens. 2021 Jan;39(1):90-100. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002621.
4
Proinflammation, profibrosis, and arterial aging.促炎、促纤维化与动脉衰老。
Aging Med (Milton). 2020 Mar 18;3(3):159-168. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12099. eCollection 2020 Sep.
5
Increased arterial velocity pulse index is an independent factor related to skeletal muscle mass reduction and tissue damage in patients with cardiovascular disease.动脉速度脉搏指数升高是与心血管疾病患者骨骼肌质量减少和组织损伤相关的独立因素。
Hypertens Res. 2020 Jun;43(6):534-542. doi: 10.1038/s41440-020-0404-6. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
6
Anisotropic residual stresses in arteries.动脉中的各向异性残余应力。
J R Soc Interface. 2019 Feb 28;16(151):20190029. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2019.0029.
7
New non-invasive indexes of arterial stiffness are significantly correlated with severity and complexity of coronary atherosclerosis.动脉僵硬度的新型非侵入性指标与冠状动脉粥样硬化的严重程度和复杂性显著相关。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2018 May 8:1-7. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2018.1465072.
8
Screening Validity of Arterial Pressure-Volume Index and Arterial Velocity-Pulse Index for Preclinical Atherosclerosis in Japanese Community-Dwelling Adults: the Nagasaki Islands Study.动脉压力-容积指数和动脉速度-脉搏指数对日本社区居住成年人临床前动脉粥样硬化的筛查有效性:长崎岛研究。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):792-798. doi: 10.5551/jat.43125. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
9
Arterial Velocity Pulse Index as a Novel Marker of Atherosclerosis Using Pulse Wave Analysis on High Sensitivity Troponin T in Hypertensive Patients.动脉速度脉搏指数作为动脉粥样硬化的新型标志物:对高血压患者高敏肌钙蛋白T进行脉搏波分析
Cardiol Res. 2017 Apr;8(2):36-43. doi: 10.14740/cr545w. Epub 2017 May 3.
10
Association between novel arterial stiffness indices and risk factors of cardiovascular disease.新型动脉僵硬度指标与心血管疾病危险因素之间的关联。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Nov 7;16(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0389-x.