Department of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Berkman Library, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Mar;16(3):314-328. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
Aortic valve stenosis is a progressive disorder with variable progression rates. The factors affecting aortic stenosis (AS) progression remain largely unknown.
This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to determine AS progression rates and to assess the impact of baseline AS severity and sex on disease progression.
The authors searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to July 1, 2020, for prospective studies evaluating the progression of AS with the use of echocardiography (mean gradient [MG], peak velocity [PV], peak gradient [PG], or aortic valve area [AVA]) or computed tomography (calcium score [AVC]). Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the rate of AS progression for each parameter stratified by baseline severity, and meta-regression was performed to determine the impact of baseline severity and of sex on AS progression rate.
A total of 24 studies including 5,450 patients (40% female) met inclusion criteria. The pooled annualized progression of MG was +4.10 mm Hg (95% CI: 2.80-5.41 mm Hg), AVA -0.08 cm (95% CI: 0.06-0.10 cm), PV +0.19 m/s (95% CI: 0.13-0.24 m/s), PG +7.86 mm Hg (95% CI: 4.98-10.75 mm Hg), and AVC +158.5 AU (95% CI: 55.0-261.9 AU). Increasing baseline severity of AS was predictive of higher rates of progression for MG (P < 0.001), PV (P = 0.001), and AVC (P < 0.001), but not AVA (P = 0.34) or PG (P = 0.21). Only 4 studies reported AS progression stratified by sex, with only PV and AVC having 3 studies to perform a meta-analysis. No difference between sex was observed for PV (P = 0.397) or AVC (P = 0.572), but the level of confidence was low.
This study provides progression rates for both hemodynamic and anatomic parameters of AS and shows that increasing hemodynamic and anatomic baseline severity is associated with faster AS progression. More studies are needed to determine if sex differences affect AS progression. (Aortic Valve Stenosis Progression Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; CRD42021207726).
主动脉瓣狭窄是一种进展性疾病,其进展速度不一。影响主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)进展的因素在很大程度上尚不清楚。
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在确定 AS 的进展速度,并评估基线 AS 严重程度和性别对疾病进展的影响。
作者检索了 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心从成立到 2020 年 7 月 1 日的前瞻性研究,评估了使用超声心动图(平均梯度[MG]、峰值速度[PV]、峰值梯度[PG]或主动脉瓣面积[AVA])或计算机断层扫描(钙评分[AVC])评估 AS 进展的研究。采用随机效应荟萃分析评估每个参数的 AS 进展率,并进行荟萃回归分析以确定基线严重程度和性别对 AS 进展率的影响。
共有 24 项研究纳入了 5450 名患者(40%为女性)符合纳入标准。MG 的年化进展率为+4.10mmHg(95%CI:2.80-5.41mmHg),AVA 减少 0.08cm(95%CI:0.06-0.10cm),PV 增加 0.19m/s(95%CI:0.13-0.24m/s),PG 增加 7.86mmHg(95%CI:4.98-10.75mmHg),AVC 增加 158.5AU(95%CI:55.0-261.9AU)。基线 AS 严重程度增加与 MG(P<0.001)、PV(P=0.001)和 AVC(P<0.001)的进展速度更快相关,但与 AVA(P=0.34)或 PG(P=0.21)无关。只有 4 项研究报告了按性别分层的 AS 进展情况,只有 3 项研究报告了 PV 和 AVC 的性别分层的荟萃分析。在 PV(P=0.397)或 AVC(P=0.572)方面,未观察到性别差异,但置信水平较低。
本研究提供了 AS 血流动力学和解剖参数的进展率,并表明基线血流动力学和解剖严重程度的增加与 AS 进展速度更快相关。需要更多的研究来确定性别差异是否影响 AS 的进展。