From the Department of Surgery (Jacobs, Kim, Tetley, Shireman), University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
Department of Population Health Sciences (Schmidt, Wang), University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX.
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Feb 1;236(2):352-364. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000468. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
Surgical outcome/cost analyses typically focus on single outcomes and do not include encounters beyond the index hospitalization.
This cohort study used NSQIP (2013-2019) data with electronic health record and cost data risk-adjusted for frailty, preoperative acute serious conditions (PASC), case status, and operative stress assessing cumulative costs of failure to achieve textbook outcomes defined as absence of 30-day Clavien-Dindo level III and IV complications, emergency department visits/observation stays (EDOS), and readmissions across insurance types (private, Medicare, Medicaid, uninsured). Return costs were defined as costs of all 30-day emergency department visits/observation stays and readmissions.
Cases were performed on patients (private 1,506; Medicare 1,218; Medicaid 1,420; uninsured 2,178) with a mean age 52.3 years (SD 14.7) and 47.5% male. Medicaid and uninsured patients had higher odds of presenting with preoperative acute serious conditions (adjusted odds ratios 1.89 and 1.81, respectively) and undergoing urgent/emergent surgeries (adjusted odds ratios 2.23 and 3.02, respectively) vs private. Medicaid and uninsured patients had lower odds of textbook outcomes (adjusted odds ratios 0.53 and 0.78, respectively) and higher odds of emergency department visits/observation stays and readmissions vs private. Not achieving textbook outcomes was associated with a greater than 95.1% increase in cumulative costs. Medicaid patients had a relative increase of 23.1% in cumulative costs vs private, which was 18.2% after adjusting for urgent/emergent cases. Return costs were 37.5% and 65.8% higher for Medicaid and uninsured patients, respectively, vs private.
Higher costs for Medicaid patients were partially driven by increased presentation acuity (increased rates/odds of preoperative acute serious conditions and urgent/emergent surgeries) and higher rates of multiple emergency department visits/observation stays and readmission occurrences. Decreasing surgical costs/improving outcomes should focus on reducing urgent/emergent surgeries and improving postoperative care coordination, especially for Medicaid and uninsured populations.
手术结果/成本分析通常侧重于单一结果,并且不包括索引住院治疗以外的就诊情况。
本队列研究使用了 NSQIP(2013-2019 年)数据,结合电子病历和成本数据,并根据虚弱程度、术前急性严重情况(PASC)、病例状态和手术应激情况进行风险调整,以评估未能达到教科书结果的累计失败成本,这些结果定义为不存在 30 天 Clavien-Dindo Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级并发症、急诊就诊/观察停留(EDOS)和在所有保险类型(私人、医疗保险、医疗补助、无保险)下的再入院。返回成本被定义为所有 30 天急诊就诊/观察停留和再入院的成本。
在接受手术的患者中(私人保险 1506 例,医疗保险 1218 例,医疗补助 1420 例,无保险 2178 例),平均年龄为 52.3 岁(标准差 14.7),男性占 47.5%。与私人保险患者相比,医疗补助和无保险患者更有可能出现术前急性严重情况(调整后的优势比分别为 1.89 和 1.81)和接受紧急/急诊手术(调整后的优势比分别为 2.23 和 3.02)。医疗补助和无保险患者更有可能无法达到教科书结果(调整后的优势比分别为 0.53 和 0.78),并且更有可能出现急诊就诊/观察停留和再入院情况。未能达到教科书结果与累计成本增加超过 95.1%相关。与私人保险患者相比,医疗补助患者的累计成本增加了 23.1%,但在调整紧急/急诊病例后,这一比例为 18.2%。与私人保险患者相比,医疗补助和无保险患者的返回成本分别高出 37.5%和 65.8%。
医疗补助患者的高成本部分是由于就诊 acuity 增加(术前急性严重情况和紧急/急诊手术的发生率/概率增加)以及多次急诊就诊/观察停留和再入院发生率增加所致。降低手术成本/改善结果应侧重于减少紧急/急诊手术,并改善术后护理协调,特别是针对医疗补助和无保险人群。