Matsuda M, Fujiwara H, Onodera T, Tanaka M, Wu D J, Fujiwara T, Hamashima Y, Kawai C
Department of Internal Medicine, Kyoto University, Japan.
Circulation. 1987 Nov;76(5):981-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.76.5.981.
To assess the importance of contraction band necrosis (CBN) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with selective intracoronary thrombolysis, CBN, coagulation necrosis, and infarct size (expressed as CBN + coagulation necrosis) were analyzed quantitatively in 16 autopsied hearts. Intracoronary thrombolysis was performed from 2 to 6 hr after the onset of AMI, and the time from the onset of AMI to death was 7 to 168 hr. Cineangiography revealed no evidence of good collateral circulation in any of the patients. The 16 patients were classified into three groups: six patients with successful thrombolysis (100% to 99% stenosis, group I), five patients with unsuccessful thrombolysis (100% to 100%, group II), and five patients with 99% stenosis before thrombolysis (group III). Among the three groups, there were no significant differences in the time from the onset of AMI to thrombolysis, the time from the onset of AMI to death, the cause of death, or the degree of collateral circulation. The percentage of the risk area involved by the infarct in group I (82 +/- 6%) was similar to that in group II (80 +/- 11%). Infarct size was not reduced in group I because collateral circulation was not good and because the degree of recanalization after thrombolysis was 1%. However, the percentage of the infarct area with CBN was significantly higher in group I (20 +/- 9%) then in group II (3 +/- 3%). This finding shows that diffuse CBN occurred after reperfusion in patients with AMI treated with thrombolysis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为评估收缩带坏死(CBN)在接受选择性冠状动脉内溶栓治疗的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者中的重要性,对16例尸检心脏的CBN、凝固性坏死和梗死面积(以CBN + 凝固性坏死表示)进行了定量分析。在AMI发作后2至6小时进行冠状动脉内溶栓,从AMI发作至死亡的时间为7至168小时。血管造影显示所有患者均无良好侧支循环的证据。16例患者分为三组:6例溶栓成功患者(狭窄率100%至99%,I组),5例溶栓失败患者(狭窄率100%至100%,II组),以及5例溶栓前狭窄率为99%的患者(III组)。三组之间,从AMI发作至溶栓的时间、从AMI发作至死亡的时间、死亡原因或侧支循环程度均无显著差异。I组梗死累及风险区域的百分比(82±6%)与II组(80±11%)相似。I组梗死面积未缩小,原因是侧支循环不佳且溶栓后再通程度为1%。然而,I组梗死区域出现CBN的百分比(20±9%)显著高于II组(3±3%)。这一发现表明,接受溶栓治疗的AMI患者再灌注后发生了弥漫性CBN。(摘要截断于250字)