Suppr超能文献

评估皮肤科 Medicare Part B 供应商级数据集的全面性。

Assessment of comprehensiveness of Medicare Part B provider-level data sets within dermatology.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut Health Center, 21 South Road, 2Nd Floor, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dermatol Res. 2023 Aug;315(6):1805-1807. doi: 10.1007/s00403-023-02530-8. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

Abstract

Publicly available provider-level Medicare Part B data sets have been increasingly utilized for health services research in dermatology. Despite offering detailed insights, an important limitation of these data sets is suppression of services performed for < 11 Medicare beneficiaries at the level of each provider. This longitudinal review assesses the magnitude of this limitation by comparing service counts in provider-level Medicare data sets to those in aggregate data sets, ultimately identifying a concordance rate of 94.3% for dermatology services. However, facility-based visits (52.5%), inpatient evaluation and management visits (59.7%), phototherapy (62.9%), incision and drainage (61.1%), and nail procedures (38.0%) were less well-represented in the provider-level data sets. Provider-level data sets are most suitable for assessing dermatology services in aggregate and among specific high-volume procedure groups but alternative data sets should be considered when investigating inpatient services, facility-based services (more common in certain states), or rarely performed procedures.

摘要

公开可用的医保 Part B 提供商级别数据已被越来越多地用于皮肤科的医疗服务研究。尽管这些数据集提供了详细的见解,但它们的一个重要局限性是在每个提供商层面上,对服务数量进行了<11 名 Medicare 受益人的抑制。本纵向研究通过比较提供商级别数据集中的服务计数与汇总数据集中的服务计数,评估了这种局限性的程度,最终确定皮肤科服务的一致性率为 94.3%。然而,医疗机构就诊(52.5%)、住院评估和管理就诊(59.7%)、光疗(62.9%)、切开引流(61.1%)和指甲手术(38.0%)在提供商级别数据集中的代表性较差。提供商级别数据集最适合评估皮肤科服务的总体情况和特定高数量手术组,但在调查住院服务、医疗机构就诊(在某些州更为常见)或很少进行的手术时,应考虑替代数据集。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验