• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抖音上减肥手术视频的质量和受欢迎程度趋势。

Quality and Popularity Trends of Weight Loss Procedure Videos on TikTok.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 1305 York Avenue, 4thFloor, New York, NY, 10021, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2023 Mar;33(3):714-719. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06409-x. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11695-022-06409-x
PMID:36652187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9845809/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The use of social media as a medical information tool parallels rising obesity rates. TikTok, the popular video-sharing platform, contains nearly 99,000 videos hashtagged "weightloss." Prior studies have analyzed the quality of medical information on TikTok in other areas of medicine. However, the quality of videos regarding weight loss procedures has not yet been determined.

METHODS

Hashtags encompassing three weight loss modalities were searched using TikTok's algorithm. The first 50 videos meeting inclusion criteria for each modality were considered. Two independent reviewers categorized videos and assessed their content quality using DISCERN. Quality scores and popularity were compared between videos sources, modalities, and content categories.

RESULTS

Of 150 videos included, 20.7% were created by physicians versus 79.3% by non-physicians (p < 0.001). The average DISCERN score for physician-created content was significantly higher than that of non-physicians (p < 0.001), despite significantly less popularity (p < 0.002). The 50 most popular videos had significantly lower DISCERN scores than the 50 least popular (p < 0.02). The average DISCERN score for endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) videos were significantly higher than videos related to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) (p < 0.001). VSG-related videos were significantly more popular than RYGB- and ESG-related videos (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Finally, educational videos had significantly higher DISCERN scores than weight loss transformation and personal experience videos (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Videos on TikTok related to weight loss procedures are poor, and greater popularity trends with lower quality. Assessment of content can encourage viewers to seek better information and allow providers to improve patient information tools.

摘要

简介

社交媒体作为一种医学信息工具的使用与肥胖率的上升呈平行关系。TikTok 是一个流行的视频分享平台,其中包含近 99000 个标记为“weightloss”的视频。先前的研究已经分析了 TikTok 上其他医学领域的医学信息质量。然而,关于减肥手术的视频质量尚未确定。

方法

使用 TikTok 的算法搜索涵盖三种减肥方式的标签。考虑到每种方式符合纳入标准的前 50 个视频。两位独立的评审员对视频进行分类,并使用 DISCERN 评估其内容质量。比较了视频来源、方式和内容类别之间的质量评分和受欢迎程度。

结果

在纳入的 150 个视频中,20.7%是由医生制作的,而 79.3%是由非医生制作的(p<0.001)。尽管受欢迎程度显著较低(p<0.002),但由医生制作的内容的平均 DISCERN 评分明显高于非医生(p<0.001)。最受欢迎的 50 个视频的 DISCERN 评分明显低于最不受欢迎的 50 个视频(p<0.02)。内镜袖状胃成形术(ESG)视频的平均 DISCERN 评分明显高于 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)和垂直袖状胃切除术(VSG)相关视频(p<0.001)。VSG 相关视频的受欢迎程度明显高于 RYGB 和 ESG 相关视频(p<0.001 和 p<0.001)。最后,教育视频的 DISCERN 评分明显高于减肥转型和个人经验视频(p<0.001)。

结论

TikTok 上与减肥手术相关的视频质量较差,且受欢迎程度越高,质量越低。对内容的评估可以鼓励观众寻求更好的信息,并允许提供者改进患者信息工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/9845809/82b5cf4d526b/11695_2022_6409_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/9845809/4ec90859588a/11695_2022_6409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/9845809/17c032d345c9/11695_2022_6409_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/9845809/e05002084e99/11695_2022_6409_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/9845809/82b5cf4d526b/11695_2022_6409_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/9845809/4ec90859588a/11695_2022_6409_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/9845809/17c032d345c9/11695_2022_6409_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/9845809/e05002084e99/11695_2022_6409_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14a0/9845809/82b5cf4d526b/11695_2022_6409_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality and Popularity Trends of Weight Loss Procedure Videos on TikTok.抖音上减肥手术视频的质量和受欢迎程度趋势。
Obes Surg. 2023 Mar;33(3):714-719. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06409-x. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
2
Evaluating the Distribution, Quality, and Educational Value of Videos Related to Knee Instability Exercises on the Social Media Platform TikTok.评估社交媒体平台TikTok上与膝关节不稳定练习相关视频的分布、质量和教育价值。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 28;16(3):e57104. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57104. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
Surgery for weight loss in adults.成人减肥手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4.
4
Quality of Spine Surgery Information on Social Media: A DISCERN Analysis of TikTok Videos.社交媒体上脊柱手术信息的质量:对TikTok视频的DISCERN分析
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1443-1449. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346700.350. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
5
Current Public Trends in the Discussion of Dry Eyes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Popular Content on TikTok.干眼症讨论中的当前公众趋势:TikTok上热门内容的横断面分析
Cureus. 2022 Feb 28;14(2):e22702. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22702. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Analyzing the Quality of Aesthetic Surgery Procedure Videos on TikTok.分析 TikTok 上美容手术流程视频的质量。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):2078-2083. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab291.
7
Navigating Digital Dermatology: An Analysis of Acne-Related Content on TikTok.探索数字皮肤病学:TikTok上与痤疮相关内容的分析
Cureus. 2023 Sep 14;15(9):e45226. doi: 10.7759/cureus.45226. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.开放获取视频分享平台YouTube上袖状胃切除术视频中信息的可靠性、实用性及质量评估
Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2.
9
Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome-Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis.《TikTok 上与 Takotsubo 综合征相关视频的质量和观众参与度:内容分析》
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 26;24(9):e39360. doi: 10.2196/39360.
10
Quality of Information in Gallstone Disease Videos on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.TikTok 胆囊疾病相关视频信息质量:一项横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 8;25:e39162. doi: 10.2196/39162.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the reliability and quality of knee osteoarthritis educational content on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional content analysis.评估抖音和哔哩哔哩上膝骨关节炎教育内容的可靠性和质量:一项横断面内容分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 12;11:20552076251366390. doi: 10.1177/20552076251366390. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
When Hashtags Shape Surgical Choices: Social Media Hype and Its Impact on Bariatric Surgery Preferences in Taiwan.当标签塑造手术选择:社交媒体炒作及其对台湾减重手术偏好的影响
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul 15. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08078-y.
3
Evaluation of social media videos on weight-loss surgery and GLP-1 agonists: a content quality and reliability analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Associations of Use of Social Media and Psychopathology and Body Image in Pre- and Post-surgical Bariatric Samples: a Cross-sectional Analysis.社交媒体使用与术前和术后肥胖样本中的精神病理学和身体意象的关联:横断面分析。
Obes Surg. 2022 Sep;32(9):3047-3055. doi: 10.1007/s11695-022-06206-6. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
2
Current Public Trends in the Discussion of Dry Eyes: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Popular Content on TikTok.干眼症讨论中的当前公众趋势:TikTok上热门内容的横断面分析
Cureus. 2022 Feb 28;14(2):e22702. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22702. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
TikTok as an Information Hodgepodge: Evaluation of the Quality and Reliability of Genitourinary Cancers Related Content.
社交媒体视频对减肥手术和GLP-1激动剂的评估:内容质量与可靠性分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11938-4.
4
Comparing Weight Loss and Metabolic Outcomes of Virtual Versus In-Person Follow-Up Care in Bariatrics: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at 12 and 36 Months Post-ESG.比较减重手术中虚拟随访与面对面随访护理的体重减轻和代谢结果:内镜下袖状胃成形术(ESG)后12个月和36个月的倾向匹配分析
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul;35(7):2426-2435. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07946-x. Epub 2025 Jun 10.
5
Advancing emergency upper extremity care: A pilot study of ChatGPT's potential role in diagnosing and managing hand and wrist trauma.推进上肢急诊护理:关于ChatGPT在诊断和处理手及腕部创伤中潜在作用的一项试点研究。
J Hand Microsurg. 2025 Apr 23;17(4):100260. doi: 10.1016/j.jham.2025.100260. eCollection 2025 Jul.
6
Quality Assessment of Chinese TikTok as a Source of Information About Esophageal Cancer.作为食管癌信息来源的中国抖音的质量评估
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1007/s13187-025-02630-1.
7
Social media use among patients before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery: a systematic review.代谢和减重手术后患者使用社交媒体的情况:一项系统综述。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Jul;21(7):838-847. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.12.022. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
8
What Are TikTok Users Saying About Colorectal Cancer? An Examination of Content, Quality, and Emerging Themes.TikTok 用户对结直肠癌有何看法?内容、质量及新兴主题考察
Gastro Hep Adv. 2024 Aug 24;4(1):100534. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2024.08.013. eCollection 2025.
9
Evaluation of TikTok videos on acute pancreatitis: content quality and reliability analysis.抖音上关于急性胰腺炎的视频评估:内容质量与可靠性分析
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 2;24(1):1216. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18708-2.
10
Quality of Spine Surgery Information on Social Media: A DISCERN Analysis of TikTok Videos.社交媒体上脊柱手术信息的质量:对TikTok视频的DISCERN分析
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1443-1449. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346700.350. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
作为信息大杂烩的TikTok:泌尿生殖系统癌症相关内容的质量与可靠性评估
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 15;12:789956. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.789956. eCollection 2022.
4
Analyzing the Quality of Aesthetic Surgery Procedure Videos on TikTok.分析 TikTok 上美容手术流程视频的质量。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):2078-2083. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab291.
5
A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication.医疗保健的一个新维度:社交媒体用于健康传播的用途、益处及局限性的系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 23;15(4):e85. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1933.