From the Department of Psychiatry (T.W.M.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; School of Kinesiology (S.P.B.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science (B.P.K., S.M.P., M.L., W.Z.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis; and Department of Neurosurgery (M.A.M.), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
Neurology. 2023 Apr 4;100(14):e1510-e1519. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206853. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Some athletes experience a slow recovery after sport-related concussion (SRC). There is little agreement on what constitutes slow recovery, however, and minimal data on the prevalence, predictors, or prognosis for this group. The objectives of this study were to apply an operationalized definition of slow recovery and characterize predictors and long-term prognosis of these individuals.
This is a prospective multisite observational study of collegiate athletes. Participants underwent multimodal assessments preseason and 5 additional time points after SRC. Time from injury to initiation of return to play progression (asymptomatic timepoint) and from injury to return to play (RTP) were the primary markers of recovery.
One thousand seven hundred fifty-one concussed male and female collegiate athletes were studied. Eighty percent of participants reached the asymptomatic and/or RTP time points by days 14 and 24, respectively. Slow recovery was thus defined as exceeding 1 or both of those intervals (n = 399). This group was statistically more likely to be female (41.1% vs 35.6%, = 0.05), have higher initial postinjury SCAT symptom severity scores (mean [SD]: 36.6 [23.4] vs 25.4 [19.9], < 0.001), lower postinjury Standardized Assessment of Concussion scores (mean [SD]:25.74 [2.98] vs 26.26 [2.85], = 0.004), perform worse on the postinjury Balance Error Scoring System (mean [SD]: 17.8 [8.9] vs 15.9 [8.5], < 0.01), have fewer assessments in the first 14 days after injury (mean [SD]: 48.8 [29.7] vs 67.9 [24.6], < 0.01), and be injured in practice (70.7% vs 65.1%, = 0.04). 77.6% of the slow recovery group returned to play within 60 days of injury, and 83.4% (n = 349) returned to play within 90 days of injury. Only 10.6% had not returned to play 6 months postinjury.
This study suggests an overall favorable prognosis for slowly recovering athletes and provides data for athletes and medical teams to consider in calibrating RTP expectations and making decisions about medical disqualification vs ongoing engagement in their sport.
一些运动员在运动相关脑震荡(SRC)后恢复缓慢。然而,对于什么是恢复缓慢,目前还没有达成共识,而且对于这一人群的患病率、预测因素或预后的数据也很少。本研究的目的是应用恢复缓慢的操作性定义,并描述这些个体的预测因素和长期预后。
这是一项前瞻性多地点观察性研究,研究对象为大学生运动员。参与者在 SRC 前和之后的另外 5 个时间点接受了多模式评估。从损伤到开始重返运动进展(无症状时间点)和从损伤到重返运动(RTP)的时间是恢复的主要标志物。
研究了 1751 名患有 SRC 的男性和女性大学生运动员。80%的参与者分别在第 14 天和第 24 天达到无症状和/或 RTP 时间点。因此,将恢复缓慢定义为超过 1 个或 2 个时间点(n=399)。与其他参与者相比,这群人的统计学特征为女性(41.1%比 35.6%,=0.05)、初始损伤后 SCAT 症状严重程度评分较高(平均值[标准差]:36.6[23.4]比 25.4[19.9],<0.001)、损伤后标准化脑震荡评估量表评分较低(平均值[标准差]:25.74[2.98]比 26.26[2.85],=0.004)、损伤后平衡错误评分系统表现较差(平均值[标准差]:17.8[8.9]比 15.9[8.5],<0.01)、在损伤后的前 14 天内接受的评估较少(平均值[标准差]:48.8[29.7]比 67.9[24.6],<0.01)、且在练习中受伤(70.7%比 65.1%,=0.04)。在损伤后 60 天内,77.6%的恢复缓慢组重返运动,在损伤后 90 天内,83.4%(n=349)重返运动。只有 10.6%的运动员在损伤后 6 个月尚未重返运动。
本研究表明,恢复缓慢的运动员总体预后良好,并为运动员和医疗团队提供了数据,以帮助他们调整 RTP 预期,并在医学淘汰与继续从事运动之间做出决策。