Hosseinzadeh Mahdi, Sardroodian Mahta, Razian Mina, Benoit Colleen, Hoogenboom Barbara J
Department of Sport Injuries and Corrective Exercises, Sport Sciences Research Institute, Tehran, Iran.
Department of Sport Sciences, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran.
PM R. 2023 Oct;15(10):1223-1238. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12951. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
The scheduling of clinical rehabilitative exercise should combine best possible delivery of exercise with the most efficient use of time, facilities, equipment, and personnel. However, it is not clear whether distribution of a fixed amount of exercise volume is more efficient over a longer time period in a week (distributed manner) than over a shorter time period in a week (massed manner).
To evaluate the effects of distributed versus massed within- and between-session exercise scheduling on balance, exercise performance, and pain perception in middle-aged women with knee pain.
Thirty-four middle-aged female volunteers (mean age ± SD, 56.0 ± 5.2 years old; mean weight ± SD, 66.9 ± 7.6 kg; mean body mass index [BMI] ± SD, 27.7 ± 2.8 kg/m ) were randomly assigned to one of the three groups consisting of Rehabilitative Massed Scheduling (RMS); Rehabilitative Distributed Scheduling (RDS); or Control group (CG).
Isometric strength, balance, functional movement performance, and pain perception were assessed at baseline (pre), at week 8 (mid), and 1 week after the full 12 weeks (post) of exercise training or no intervention (CG).
Significant improvements in balance, functional movement performance, and pain perception were found after both RDS and RMS after 8 and 12 weeks compared to the control group (p ˂ .05). Examination of the net changes (% ∆) between RDS and RMS showed a statistically significant difference only in the right 30-second arm curl records of individuals in the RDS group, which were significantly higher than the RMS group at the post-test (p ˂ .05).
Rehabilitative training providers are advised to distribute the drills of rehabilitative exercise training within and between the sessions of exercise per week only when a positive Bottom-Up Rise Strength Transfer effect (BURST) effect of exercise training is needed. Otherwise, if the whole amount of rehabilitative exercise work is identical the benefit of going five versus three times per week to the rehabilitation centers would be similar.
临床康复锻炼的安排应在尽可能提供最佳锻炼效果的同时,最有效地利用时间、设施、设备和人员。然而,一周内较长时间段(分散方式)分配固定运动量是否比一周内较短时间段(集中方式)更有效尚不清楚。
评估分散与集中的组内和组间锻炼安排对膝关节疼痛中年女性平衡能力、运动表现和疼痛感知的影响。
34名中年女性志愿者(平均年龄±标准差,56.0±5.2岁;平均体重±标准差,66.9±7.6千克;平均体重指数[BMI]±标准差,27.7±2.8千克/平方米)被随机分配到三组之一,即康复集中安排组(RMS)、康复分散安排组(RDS)或对照组(CG)。
在基线(训练前)、第8周(中期)以及运动训练或无干预(CG组)满12周后1周(训练后)评估等长肌力、平衡能力、功能性运动表现和疼痛感知。
与对照组相比,RDS组和RMS组在8周和12周后平衡能力、功能性运动表现和疼痛感知均有显著改善(p<0.05)。对RDS组和RMS组之间的净变化(%∆)进行检查发现,仅RDS组个体的右侧30秒手臂卷曲记录存在统计学显著差异,在测试后该记录显著高于RMS组(p<0.05)。
建议康复训练提供者仅在需要运动训练产生积极的自下而上的力量转移效应(BURST效应)时,在每周锻炼的组内和组间分散康复锻炼训练的练习。否则,如果康复锻炼总量相同,每周去康复中心五次与三次的益处相似。