• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用锥形束计算机断层扫描比较两种面部类型的下颌颊侧牙槽骨特征。

Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf bone characteristics between two facial types using cone beam computed tomography.

作者信息

Ramasamy Padmanathan, Sabrish Sharanya, Pattabiraman Vinod, Shivamurthy Prashantha Govinakovi, Sagarkar Roshan, Mathew Silju

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Consultant Orthodontist, Private Practitioner, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dent Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;33(3):277-281. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_1201_21.

DOI:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_1201_21
PMID:36656188
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mandibular buccal shelf (MBS) offers good quality and quantity of bone for orthodontic bone screw (OBS) insertion. Despite several reports of treated patients, there are numerous variables in selecting the exact placement site for OBS placement in the MBS. There are also anatomical variations in this area which must be considered.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to measure and compare the MBS bone characteristics for OBS placement using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) between two different facial types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty CBCT samples were collected (40 samples of group A horizontal growers and 40 of group B vertical growers). Each CBCT image was reconstructed and oriented with CS 3D CBCT software. The cortical bone thickness, the slope of the MBS, and buccolingual inclination of mandibular second molar were measured and analysed.

RESULT

Cortical bone thickness among horizontal growers was 5.23 ± 0.58 mm and among vertical growers was 4.85 ± 0.37 mm. The slope of MBS among horizontal growers was 60.83 ± 6.15 degrees and among vertical growers was 66.75 ± 6.27 degrees. In both the parameters there was a statistically significant difference between the groups. There was no significant difference between the groups for the buccolingual inclination of 2 molar.

CONCLUSION

Increased cortical bone thickness and the flatter slope of MBS at the 2 molar region allows for easier placement of OBS in horizontal growers than in vertical growers.

摘要

背景

下颌颊侧骨板(MBS)为正畸骨钉(OBS)植入提供了优质且充足的骨量。尽管有一些关于已治疗患者的报告,但在MBS中选择OBS的确切植入位置时存在众多变量。该区域还存在解剖变异,必须予以考虑。

目的

本研究旨在使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)测量和比较两种不同面型患者用于OBS植入的MBS骨特征。

材料与方法

收集了80例CBCT样本(A组水平生长型患者40例,B组垂直生长型患者40例)。使用CS 3D CBCT软件对每个CBCT图像进行重建和定向。测量并分析皮质骨厚度、MBS的斜率以及下颌第二磨牙的颊舌向倾斜度。

结果

水平生长型患者的皮质骨厚度为5.23±0.58毫米,垂直生长型患者为4.85±0.37毫米。水平生长型患者MBS的斜率为60.83±6.15度,垂直生长型患者为66.75±6.27度。在这两个参数上,两组之间存在统计学显著差异。两组下颌第二磨牙的颊舌向倾斜度无显著差异。

结论

与垂直生长型患者相比,水平生长型患者在第二磨牙区域皮质骨厚度增加且MBS斜率更平缓,这使得OBS更容易植入。

相似文献

1
Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf bone characteristics between two facial types using cone beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描比较两种面部类型的下颌颊侧牙槽骨特征。
Indian J Dent Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;33(3):277-281. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_1201_21.
2
Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.成人下颌颊棚区微型种植体植入的骨与皮质骨厚度。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Sep;87(5):745-751. doi: 10.2319/011117-34.1. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
3
Comparison of mandibular buccal shelf morphology between adolescents and adults with different vertical patterns using CBCT.利用 CBCT 对不同垂直型青少年与成年人下颌颊棚形态的比较
Oral Radiol. 2024 Jan;40(1):58-68. doi: 10.1007/s11282-023-00710-w. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
4
CBCT comparison of buccal shelf bone thickness in adult Dravidian population at various sites, depths and angulation - A retrospective study.CBCT 比较不同部位、深度和角度的成年达罗毗荼人群颊棚骨厚度-一项回顾性研究。
Int Orthod. 2021 Sep;19(3):471-479. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
5
A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of Bone Volume Variations of Extra-alveolar Region Based on Sex, Age, Vertical and Sagittal Facial Patterns.基于性别、年龄、面型的牙槽外区域骨量变化的锥形束 CT 分析
J Craniofac Surg. 2023 Oct 1;34(7):e660-e664. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009506. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
6
Safe sites for buccal shelf bone screw placement in various skeletal malocclusions: A CBCT study.各类骨骼错牙合畸形中颊侧牙槽骨螺钉植入的安全位点:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究
J Orthod Sci. 2023 Nov 2;12:63. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_13_23. eCollection 2023.
7
Mandibular buccal shelf and infrazygomatic crest thicknesses in patients with different vertical facial heights.不同垂直面型患者下颌颊棚和颧牙槽嵴厚度的研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Sep;158(3):349-356. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.08.016.
8
Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients.白人患者下颌颊侧骨板用于微螺钉植入的解剖学评估。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Apr;153(4):505-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.014.
9
Variability associated with mandibular buccal shelf area width and height in subjects with different growth pattern, sex, and growth status.不同生长型、性别和生长状态个体下颌颊棚区宽度和高度的变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Jan;159(1):59-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.11.020. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
10
Safe regions of miniscrew implantation for distalization of mandibular dentition with CBCT.利用 CBCT 对下颌牙列进行远移时,微型种植体植入的安全区域。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Dec 9;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0297-6.