Department of Psychiatry, Boston Medical Center.
The Graduate Center, City University of New York.
Psychol Assess. 2023 May;35(5):383-395. doi: 10.1037/pas0001215. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessment among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adults is complex because the literature offers little guidance on affirming assessment that accurately captures both trauma- and discrimination-related distress. This study aimed to characterize threats to precise PTSD assessment that arose during the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for the (CAPS-5). Our sample ( = 44) included trans women (38%), trans men (25%), nonbinary people (23%), and other TGD identities (14%). Participants were mostly White (75%), non-Latinx (82%), educated (91% at least some college), with a mean age of 37 years ( = 15.5). Demographic and CAPS-5 scoring data as well as content analysis of audio-recorded CAPS-5 interviews are reported. All participants reported trauma exposure, and nearly half met PTSD diagnostic criteria (49%). Interpersonal assault was a common trauma type linked to posttraumatic symptoms (77%); 41% were sexual assaults; and 41% were discrimination-based (e.g., linked to gender identity) physical or sexual assaults. Qualitative findings suggest how and when discrimination-related experiences may threaten PTSD assessment accuracy, leading to overpathologizing or underdetection of symptoms, for example, (a) initial selection of a noncriterion A discrimination event as "worst event," (b) linking symptoms to internalized transphobia (rather than trauma), and (c) linking victimization to gender identity/expression. Threats to PTSD assessment were more common when symptoms were linked to discrimination-based traumatic events, suggesting the importance of understanding contextual factors of index events. We offer a framework for understanding unique challenges to the assessment of PTSD among TGD people and provide recommendations for improving assessment. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)在跨性别和性别多样化(TGD)成年人中的评估较为复杂,因为文献对既能准确捕捉创伤相关痛苦又能捕捉歧视相关痛苦的肯定性评估提供的指导很少。本研究旨在描述在《临床医师管理 PTSD 量表第五版》(CAPS-5)评估中出现的对精确 PTSD 评估的威胁。我们的样本(n=44)包括跨性别女性(38%)、跨性别男性(25%)、非二元性别者(23%)和其他 TGD 身份(14%)。参与者主要为白人(75%)、非拉丁裔(82%)、受过教育(91%至少受过一些大学教育),平均年龄为 37 岁(SD=15.5)。报告了人口统计学和 CAPS-5 评分数据以及对 CAPS-5 访谈的音频记录的内容分析。所有参与者均报告了创伤暴露,近一半符合 PTSD 诊断标准(49%)。人际攻击是与创伤后症状相关的常见创伤类型(77%);41%是性攻击;41%是基于歧视的(例如,与性别认同相关)身体或性攻击。定性研究结果表明,歧视相关经历如何以及何时可能威胁 PTSD 评估的准确性,导致症状过度病理化或漏诊,例如,(a)最初选择非标准 A 歧视事件作为“最严重事件”,(b)将症状与内化的跨性别恐惧症联系起来(而不是创伤),以及(c)将受害与性别认同/表达联系起来。当症状与基于歧视的创伤性事件相关时,PTSD 评估的威胁更为常见,这表明了解指数事件的背景因素的重要性。我们提供了一个理解 TGD 人群 PTSD 评估的独特挑战的框架,并提出了改进评估的建议。(APA,2023 年,所有权利保留)。