• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Surfactant therapy using a bronchofiberscope in respiratory distress syndrome.

作者信息

Wasa Masanori, Hasegawa Hisaya, Kihara Hirotaka, Yamada Yosuke, Mizogami Masae, Kitamura Rei, Ikeda Kenta

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University Adachi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Pediatrics, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

Pediatr Int. 2023 Jan;65(1):e15478. doi: 10.1111/ped.15478.

DOI:10.1111/ped.15478
PMID:36656737
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Avoiding endotracheal intubation and using nasal continuous positive airway pressure as the initial treatment is recommended in infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), and modes of lesser invasive surfactant administration have recently been reported. We report a pilot study assessing the feasibility of surfactant therapy using a bronchofiberscope (STUB) in RDS.

METHODS

Surfactant was administered to 31 preterm infants (gestational age range of 28 weeks 0 days to 36 weeks 6 days) diagnosed with RDS, through the working channel of the bronchofiberscope or endotracheal tubes. Patient characteristics, outcomes, adverse events, and comorbidities were assessed in the two groups.

RESULTS

Twelve infants received STUB. Two of the 12 infants (17%) needed subsequent intubation and additional surfactant administration. Nineteen infants received surfactant through endotracheal tubes. Four of the 19 infants (21%) required additional surfactants. There was no significant difference in the number of infants that needed additional surfactant (p = 1.00). Gestational age, birthweight, length of hospitalization, adverse events, such as desaturations and bradycardias, and comorbidities were similar between the two groups. Days of invasive ventilation were significantly shorter in the STUB group (p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

STUB was feasible in this small cohort and reduced the need for intubation to 17%, leading to fewer days of invasive ventilation, without increasing comorbidities and adverse events. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to administer surfactants using bronchofiberscopes.

摘要

相似文献

1
Surfactant therapy using a bronchofiberscope in respiratory distress syndrome.
Pediatr Int. 2023 Jan;65(1):e15478. doi: 10.1111/ped.15478.
2
A pilot study of evaluation of semi-rigid and flexible catheters for less invasive surfactant administration in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome-a randomized controlled trial.一项评价早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征应用半刚性和软性导管行微创表面活性剂给药的初步研究——一项随机对照试验。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12887-022-03714-3.
3
Less invasive surfactant administration versus endotracheal surfactant instillation followed by limited peak pressure ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome in China: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.经鼻给予肺表面活性物质与气管内给予肺表面活性物质后行小潮气量通气治疗中国呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的随机对照试验研究方案
Trials. 2020 Jun 11;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04390-3.
4
Minimally invasive surfactant therapy intubation for surfactant delivery in preterm infant with RDS: evaluation of safety and efficacy.经鼻持续气道正压通气联合肺表面活性物质治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):6802-6806. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1924145. Epub 2021 May 23.
5
The influence of the technique of surfactant administration (LISA vs INSURE) on the outcomes of respiratory distress syndrome treatment in preterm infants.表面活性剂给药技术(肺内滴注法与气管插管-肺表面活性物质给药法)对早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征治疗结局的影响。
Dev Period Med. 2019;23(3):163-171. doi: 10.34763/devperiodmed.20192303.163171.
6
Minimally invasive surfactant therapy versus intubation for surfactant administration in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome.经鼻持续气道正压通气与肺表面活性物质治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较
Pediatr Neonatol. 2020 Apr;61(2):210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
7
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) vs. Intubation Surfactant Extubation (InSurE) in Preterm Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气与肺表面活性物质治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机对照研究
J Trop Pediatr. 2021 Aug 27;67(4). doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmab086.
8
Timing of surfactant treatment in respiratory distress syndrome.呼吸窘迫综合征中表面活性剂治疗的时机
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Dec;28(6):101495. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2023.101495. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
9
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial.在早产儿微创表面活性剂治疗方法中,鼻持续气道正压通气与鼻间歇正压通气的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Jul;101(4):F323-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308204. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
10
Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome.早期使用表面活性剂并短暂通气与选择性使用表面活性剂及持续机械通气治疗患有或有呼吸窘迫综合征风险的早产儿的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(3):CD003063. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003063.pub2.