Neff Corey, Cioffi Gino, Waite Kristin, Kruchko Carol, Barnholtz-Sloan Jill S, Ostrom Quinn T, Iorgulescu J Bryan
Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, IL, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Neurooncol Pract. 2022 Oct 7;10(1):24-33. doi: 10.1093/nop/npac079. eCollection 2023 Feb.
A newly developed brain molecular marker (BMM) data item was implemented by US cancer registries for individuals diagnosed with brain tumors in 2018-including IDH and 1p/19q-co-deletion statuses for adult-type diffuse gliomas. We thus investigated the testing/reporting completeness of BMM in the United States.
Cases of histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma, astrocytoma, and oligodendroglioma diagnosed in 2018 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of BMM testing/reporting were evaluated for association with the selected patient, treatment, and facility-level characteristics using multivariable logistic regression. As a secondary analysis, predictors of promoter methylation testing/reporting among IDH-wildtype glioblastoma individuals were assessed. Key limitations of the BMM data item were that it did not include any details regarding testing technique or assay type and could not distinguish between a lack of testing and a lack of cancer registry reporting of testing results.
Among 8306 histopathologically diagnosed adult-type diffuse gliomas nationally, overall BMM testing/reporting completeness was 81.1%. Compared to biopsy-only cases, odds of testing/reporting increased for subtotal (OR= 1.38 [95% CI: 1.20-1.59], < .001) and gross total resection (OR=1.50 [95% CI: 1.31-1.72], < .001). Furthermore, the odds were lowest at community centers (hospitals (67.3%; OR=0.35 [95% CI: 0.26-0.46], < .001) and highest at academic/NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers (85.4%; referent). By geographical location, BMM testing/reporting completeness ranged from a high of 86.8% at New England (referent) to a low of 76.0 % in the West South Central region (OR=0.57 [95% CI: 0.42-0.78]; < .001). Extent of resection, Commission-on-Cancer facility type, and facility location were additionally significant predictors of testing/reporting among IDH-wildtype glioblastoma cases.
Initial BMM testing/reporting completeness for individuals with adult-type diffuse gliomas in the United States was promising, although patterns varied by hospital attributes and extent of resection.
美国癌症登记机构针对2018年被诊断为脑肿瘤的个体实施了一项新开发的脑部分子标志物(BMM)数据项,其中包括成人型弥漫性胶质瘤的异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)和1p/19q共缺失状态。因此,我们调查了美国BMM检测/报告的完整性。
在国家癌症数据库中识别出2018年经组织病理学确诊的胶质母细胞瘤、星形细胞瘤和少突胶质细胞瘤病例。使用多变量逻辑回归评估BMM检测/报告的校正比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),以确定其与选定的患者、治疗和机构层面特征之间的关联。作为一项次要分析,评估了IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤个体中启动子甲基化检测/报告情况的预测因素。BMM数据项的主要局限性在于,它没有包括任何关于检测技术或检测类型的细节,也无法区分检测缺失和癌症登记机构未报告检测结果的情况。
在全国8306例经组织病理学诊断的成人型弥漫性胶质瘤中,BMM检测/报告的总体完整性为81.1%。与仅接受活检的病例相比,次全切除(OR = 1.38 [95% CI:1.20 - 1.59],P <.001)和全切除(OR = 1.50 [95% CI:1.31 - 1.72],P <.001)病例的检测/报告几率增加。此外,社区中心(医院)的几率最低(67.3%;OR = 0.35 [95% CI:0.26 - 0.46],P <.001),学术/美国国立癌症研究所指定的综合癌症中心的几率最高(85.4%;作为对照)。按地理位置划分,BMM检测/报告的完整性从新英格兰地区的86.8%(作为对照)到西南中部地区的76.0%不等(OR = 0.57 [95% CI:0.42 - 0.78];P <.001)。切除范围、癌症委员会指定的机构类型和机构位置也是IDH野生型胶质母细胞瘤病例检测/报告的重要预测因素。
美国成人型弥漫性胶质瘤患者的初始BMM检测/报告完整性很有前景,尽管其模式因医院属性和切除范围而异。