Abdel-Razeq Hikmat, Abujamous Lama, Al-Azzam Khansa, Abu-Fares Hala, Bani Hani Hira, Alkyam Mais, Sharaf Baha', Elemian Shatha, Tamimi Faris, Abuhijla Fawzi, Edaily Sarah, Salama Osama, Abdulelah Hazem, Daoud Rand, Abubaker Mohammad, Al-Atary Areej
Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2023 Jan 13;15:1-10. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S394092. eCollection 2023.
Genetic testing for at-risk patients with breast cancer should be routinely offered. Knowledge generated may influence both treatment decisions and cancer prevention strategies among the patients themselves and their relatives. In this study, we report on the prevalence and patterns of germline mutations, using commercially available next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based multi-gene panels (MGP).
Consecutive at-risk breast cancer patients, as determined by international guidelines, were offered germline genetic testing using a 20-gene NGS-based panel at a reference lab. Samples of peripheral blood were obtained for DNA extraction and genetic variants were classified as benign/likely benign (negative), pathogenic/likely pathogenic (positive) or variants of uncertain significance (VUS).
A total of 1310 patients, median age (range) 43 (19-82) years, were enrolled. Age ≤45 years (n = 800, 61.1%) was the most common indication for testing. Positive family history of breast, ovarian, pancreatic or prostate cancers, and triple-negative disease were among the common indications. Among the whole group, 184 (14.0%) patients had pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants; only 90 (48.9%) were in or , while 94 (51.9%) others had pathogenic variants in other genes; mostly in and . Mutation rates were significantly higher among patients with positive family history (p = 0.009); especially if they were 50 years or younger at the time of breast cancer diagnosis (p < 0.001). Patients with triple-negative disease had relatively higher rate (17.5%), and mostly in genes (71.4%). Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were reported in 559 (42.7%) patients; majority (90.7%) were in genes other than or .
Pathogenic mutations in genes other than are relatively common and could have been missed if genetic testing was restricted to . The significantly high rate of VUS associated with multi-gene panel testing can be disturbing.
对于有乳腺癌风险的患者,应常规提供基因检测。所获得的信息可能会影响患者自身及其亲属的治疗决策和癌症预防策略。在本研究中,我们报告了使用基于二代测序(NGS)的商业多基因检测板(MGP)检测种系突变的患病率和模式。
根据国际指南确定的连续有乳腺癌风险的患者,在一家参考实验室使用基于NGS的20基因检测板进行种系基因检测。采集外周血样本进行DNA提取,基因变异被分类为良性/可能良性(阴性)、致病性/可能致病性(阳性)或意义未明的变异(VUS)。
共纳入1310例患者,中位年龄(范围)43(19 - 82)岁。年龄≤45岁(n = 800,61.1%)是最常见的检测指征。乳腺癌、卵巢癌、胰腺癌或前列腺癌的阳性家族史以及三阴性疾病是常见的检测指征。在整个队列中,184例(14.0%)患者有致病性/可能致病性变异;仅90例(48.9%)在BRCA1或BRCA2基因中,而另外94例(51.9%)在其他基因中有致病性变异;主要在ATM和PALB2基因中。有阳性家族史的患者突变率显著更高(p = 0.009);尤其是在乳腺癌诊断时年龄为50岁或更年轻的患者中(p < 0.001)。三阴性疾病患者的突变率相对较高(17.5%),且大多在BRCA基因中(71.4%)。559例(42.7%)患者报告有意义未明的变异(VUS);大多数(90.7%)在BRCA1或BRCA2基因以外的基因中。
BRCA1和BRCA2基因以外的基因中的致病性突变相对常见,如果基因检测仅限于BRCA1和BRCA2基因,这些突变可能会被遗漏。与多基因检测板检测相关的意义未明的变异(VUS)的高发生率可能会令人不安。