University of California-Riverside, Riverside, California, USA.
Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Br J Sociol. 2023 Mar;74(2):241-258. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12996. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
Connecting the neoinstitutional theory with Bourdieu's field theory, we develop a framework on the dual institutional process of integration and differentiation in a field. While the neoinstitutional theory has focused on similar organizational structures, we shift the research focus to offer an institutional explanation of differential organizational status. Drawing insights from Bourdieu's theory and key concepts, we highlight that the very institutional mechanisms causing isomorphism-regulative forces, normative pressures, and cognitive processes-also generate systematic status differentiation among organizations via their different levels of capital, homologous structures, and various habitus in a field. Our extended framework has theoretical significance in advancing the neoinstitutional theory, the research of status in organizational and economic sociology, and the Bourdieusian perspective. By theorizing status differentiation among organizations, it also adds an important dimension to enrich our understanding of multilevel status and social hierarchies.
借鉴新制度主义理论与布迪厄的场域理论,我们构建了一个关于场域中整合与分化双重制度过程的理论框架。新制度主义理论主要关注相似的组织结构,而我们则将研究重点转移,旨在从制度层面解释组织地位的差异。借鉴布迪厄理论及其关键概念,我们强调,正是导致同形化的制度机制——规制力量、规范压力和认知过程——通过组织在资本、同形结构和场域中各种习性等方面的不同水平,也会导致组织之间的系统性地位分化。我们的扩展框架在推进新制度主义理论、组织和经济社会学中地位的研究以及布迪厄视角方面具有理论意义。通过从理论上解释组织之间的地位分化,它也为丰富我们对多层次地位和社会等级的理解增添了一个重要维度。