Department of Ophthalmology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 16;59(1):177. doi: 10.3390/medicina59010177.
Background and Objectives: The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize the current evidence to examine the safety and effectiveness of auricular acupressure on dry eye diseases. Materials and Methods: Twenty databases were searched from their inception until November 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which auricular acupressure was used for dry eye diseases were included. The selection process, data extraction and quantitative were conducted according to the guidelines. Results: Seven RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed that compared to artificial tears, auricular acupressure had a favorable effect on prolonging tear breakup time (TBUT), improving the Schirmer I test (SIT) score and the score of symptoms (SOS) of patients with dry eye disease (p < 0.05). Furthermore, compared to the artificial tears alone, auricular acupressure plus artificial tears had a significantly greater SIT score (p < 0.001) and response rate (p = 0.006), significantly longer TBUT (p < 0.001), and significantly lower Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) (p = 0.02) and SOS (p = 0.03). However, there was no statistically significant difference between the auricular acupressure plus artificial tears group and the artificial tears group in terms of cornea fluorescein staining (CFS) (p = 0.09). Conclusions: Auricular acupressure, as a sole intervention or in combination with artificial tears, may have a beneficial effect on dry eye disease. However, more high-quality RCTs need to be included in the future to further prove the positive effects of auricular acupressure on patients with dry eye disease.
本系统评价的目的是总结当前的证据,以检查耳穴按压治疗干眼症的安全性和有效性。
从建库到 2022 年 11 月,共检索了 20 个数据库。仅纳入使用耳穴按压治疗干眼症的随机对照试验(RCT)。根据指南进行了选择过程、数据提取和定量分析。
符合纳入标准的 RCT 有 7 项。Meta 分析显示,与人工泪液相比,耳穴按压对延长泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)、改善干眼症患者的 Schirmer I 试验(SIT)评分和症状评分(SOS)有更好的效果(p<0.05)。此外,与单独使用人工泪液相比,耳穴按压联合人工泪液治疗具有更高的 SIT 评分(p<0.001)和反应率(p=0.006)、更长的 TBUT(p<0.001)、更低的眼表疾病指数(OSDI)(p=0.02)和 SOS(p=0.03)。然而,在角膜荧光素染色(CFS)方面,耳穴按压联合人工泪液组与人工泪液组之间没有统计学差异(p=0.09)。
耳穴按压作为单独干预或联合人工泪液治疗,可能对干眼症有有益的效果。然而,未来需要纳入更多高质量的 RCT 来进一步证明耳穴按压对干眼症患者的积极作用。