文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.


DOI:10.1136/bmj.n71
PMID:33782057
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8005924/
Abstract

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, published in 2009, was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report why the review was done, what the authors did, and what they found. Over the past decade, advances in systematic review methodology and terminology have necessitated an update to the guideline. The PRISMA 2020 statement replaces the 2009 statement and includes new reporting guidance that reflects advances in methods to identify, select, appraise, and synthesise studies. The structure and presentation of the items have been modified to facilitate implementation. In this article, we present the PRISMA 2020 27-item checklist, an expanded checklist that details reporting recommendations for each item, the PRISMA 2020 abstract checklist, and the revised flow diagrams for original and updated reviews.

摘要

《系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明》于 2009 年发布,旨在帮助系统评价者透明地报告为什么要进行该评价、作者做了什么以及他们发现了什么。在过去的十年中,系统评价方法和术语的进步需要对指南进行更新。PRISMA 2020 声明取代了 2009 年的声明,并包括新的报告指南,反映了在确定、选择、评估和综合研究方面的方法的进步。项目的结构和呈现方式已经修改,以方便实施。在本文中,我们介绍了 PRISMA 2020 27 项清单,这是一份扩展的清单,详细说明了每个项目的报告建议,PRISMA 2020 摘要清单,以及原始和更新的综述修订后的流程图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/8005924/86148118c077/pagm061899.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/8005924/86148118c077/pagm061899.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c2b1/8005924/86148118c077/pagm061899.f1.jpg

相似文献

[1]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

[2]
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

[3]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021-6

[4]
Methodological quality of systematic reviews comprising clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery.

Br J Anaesth. 2021-12

[5]
PRISMA Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews.

JAMA Surg. 2021-8-1

[6]
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Int J Surg. 2010

[7]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

PLoS Med. 2021-3

[8]
Characteristics and completeness of reporting of systematic reviews of prevalence studies in adult populations: a metaresearch study.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2024-10

[9]
21st Century Evidence: Randomized Controlled Trials Versus Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

Crit Care Med. 2021-12-1

[10]
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.

BMJ. 2015-1-2

引用本文的文献

[1]
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the learning curve and mentoring in robotic pancreatectomy: transitioning from novice to expert robotic surgeon.

J Robot Surg. 2025-9-10

[2]
Validity and Reliability of Resting Energy Expenditure Measured by Indirect Calorimetry in Adults with Overweight and Obesity: a Rapid Systematic Review.

Obes Surg. 2025-9-9

[3]
Demystifying the link between periodontitis and oral cancer: a systematic review integrating clinical, pre-clinical, and in vitro data.

Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2025-9-9

[4]
Empowering Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review on Gamified Approaches To Health Literacy for Self-Care.

J Med Syst. 2025-9-9

[5]
Prediction of oncogene mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a special focus on artificial intelligence-based methods.

Eur Radiol. 2025-9-8

[6]
Chronic pain and decline in activities of daily living among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of longitudinal studies.

Eur Geriatr Med. 2025-9-8

[7]
Which radiological parameters of the coracoid process influence the diagnosis of atraumatic subscapularis tears? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025-9-6

[8]
Bridging the Gut Microbiota and the Brain, Kidney, and Cardiovascular Health: The Role of Probiotics.

Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2025-9-6

[9]
Differences in Motor Competence Between Children and Adolescents With and Without ADHD: Findings from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

J Autism Dev Disord. 2025-9-6

[10]
Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025-9-5

本文引用的文献

[1]
PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

[2]
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2021-6

[3]
PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews.

Syst Rev. 2021-1-26

[4]
Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BMJ Open. 2020-3-19

[5]
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline.

BMJ. 2020-1-16

[6]
A consensus-based transparency checklist.

Nat Hum Behav. 2020-1

[7]
Accuracy in detecting inadequate research reporting by early career peer reviewers using an online CONSORT-based peer-review tool (COBPeer) versus the usual peer-review process: a cross-sectional diagnostic study.

BMC Med. 2019-11-19

[8]
Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2019-11-15

[9]
Evaluation of Reproducible Research Practices in Oncology Systematic Reviews With Meta-analyses Referenced by National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines.

JAMA Oncol. 2019-11-1

[10]
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.

BMJ. 2019-8-28

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索