六种明尼苏达多相人格测验（MMPI）压抑量表的比较效度。
The comparative validities of six MMPI repression scales.
作者信息
Watson C G, Plemel D, Vassar P, Manifold V, Kucala T, Anderson D
机构信息
Veterans Administration Medical Center, St. Cloud, Minnesota 56301.
出版信息
J Clin Psychol. 1987 Sep;43(5):472-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(198709)43:5<472::aid-jclp2270430507>3.0.co;2-j.
The validities of six MMPI repression scales were compared using each of the other five and an independent measure as criteria (N = 190). The data gave little support to the Eichman, Welsh, and Haan Repression scales as operational definitions of this construct. The results for the Little-Fisher Denial, Byrne et al. R-S, and Haan Denial scales showed more promise.
使用其他五个明尼苏达多项人格测验（MMPI）的压抑量表中的每一个，并以一种独立测量作为标准，对六个MMPI压抑量表的效度进行了比较（N = 190）。数据几乎没有支持艾希曼、威尔士和哈恩压抑量表作为该结构的操作性定义。利特尔 - 费舍尔否认量表、伯恩等人的R - S量表和哈恩否认量表的结果显示出更大的前景。
Zotero 插件