• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处于十字路口的印度生物类似药与疫苗——复制仿制药的成功

Indian Biosimilars and Vaccines at Crossroads-Replicating the Success of Pharmagenerics.

作者信息

Panda Sunita, Singh Puneet Kumar, Mishra Snehasish, Mitra Sagnik, Pattnaik Priyabrata, Adhikary Sanjib Das, Mohapatra Ranjan K

机构信息

School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.

Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore 453552, India.

出版信息

Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 2;11(1):110. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010110.

DOI:10.3390/vaccines11010110
PMID:36679955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9865573/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The global pharma sector is fast shifting from generics to biologics and biosimilars with the first approval in Europe in 2006 followed by US approval in 2015. In the form of Hepatitis B vaccine, India saw its first recombinant biologics approval in 2000. Around 20% of generic medications and 62% of vaccines are now supplied by the Indian pharmaceutical industry. It is this good position in biologics and biosimilars production that could potentially improve healthcare via decreased treatment cost. India has witnessed large investments in biosimilars over the years. Numerous India-bred new players, e.g., Enzene Biosciences Ltd., are keen on biosimilars and have joined the race alongside the emerging giants, e.g., Biocon and Dr. Reddy's. A very positive sign was the remarkable disposition during the COVID-19 pandemic by Bharat Biotech and the Serum Institute of India. India's biopharmaceutical industry has been instrumental in producing and supplying preventives and therapeutics to fight COVID-19. Despite a weak supply chain and workforce pressure, the production was augmented to provide reasonably priced high-quality medications to more than 133 nations. Biosimilars could cost-effectively treat chronic diseases involving expensive conventional therapies, including diabetes, respiratory ailments, cancer, and connective tissue diseases. Biologics and biosimilars have been and are being tested to treat and manage COVID-19 symptoms characterized by inflammation and respiratory distress.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although India boasts many universities, research centers, and a relatively skilled workforce, its global University-Industry collaboration ranking is 24, IPR ranking remains 47 and innovation ranking 39. This reveals a wide industry-academia gap to bridge. There are gaps in effective translational research in India that must be promptly and appropriately addressed. Innovation demands strong and effective collaborations among universities, techno-incubators, and industries.

METHODOLOGY

Many successful research findings in academia do not get translation opportunities supposedly due to low industrial collaboration, low IP knowledge, and publication pressure with stringent timelines. In light of this, a detailed review of literature, including policy papers, government initiatives, and corporate reviews, was carried out, and the compilation and synthesis of the secondary data were meticulously summarized for the easy comprehension of the facts and roadmap ahead. For easy comprehension, charts, figures, and compiled tables are presented.

RESULTS

This review assesses India's situation in the biosimilar space, the gaps and areas to improve for Indian investment strategies, development, and innovation, addressing need for a more skilled workforce, industrial collaboration, and business models.

CONCLUSIONS

This review also proposes forward an approach to empowering technopreneurs to develop MSMEs for large-scale operations to support India in taking innovative thoughts to the global level to ultimately realize a self-reliant India. The limitations of the compilation are also highlighted towards the end.

摘要

背景

全球制药行业正在迅速从仿制药转向生物制剂和生物类似药,2006年在欧洲首次获批,2015年在美国获批。以乙肝疫苗的形式,印度在2000年首次批准了重组生物制剂。目前,印度制药行业供应了约20%的仿制药和62%的疫苗。正是在生物制剂和生物类似药生产方面的这种良好地位,有可能通过降低治疗成本来改善医疗保健。多年来,印度在生物类似药方面见证了大量投资。众多印度本土的新参与者,如Enzene生物科学有限公司,热衷于生物类似药,并与新兴巨头,如百康和雷迪博士实验室,一起加入了竞争。一个非常积极的迹象是,在新冠疫情期间,巴拉特生物技术公司和印度血清研究所表现出色。印度的生物制药行业在生产和供应抗击新冠疫情的预防药物和治疗药物方面发挥了重要作用。尽管供应链薄弱且劳动力面临压力,但产量仍得以增加,为133多个国家提供了价格合理的高质量药物。生物类似药可以经济高效地治疗涉及昂贵传统疗法的慢性病,包括糖尿病、呼吸系统疾病、癌症和结缔组织疾病。生物制剂和生物类似药一直在并正在接受测试,以治疗和管理以炎症和呼吸窘迫为特征的新冠症状。

综述目的

尽管印度拥有众多大学、研究中心和相对熟练的劳动力,但其全球产学研合作排名为第24位,知识产权排名仍为第47位,创新排名为第39位。这表明存在很大的产学研差距需要弥合。印度在有效的转化研究方面存在差距,必须迅速且适当地加以解决。创新需要大学、技术孵化器和产业之间强大而有效的合作。

方法

学术界许多成功的研究成果没有得到转化机会,据推测是由于产业合作不足、知识产权知识匮乏以及严格时间限制下的发表压力。有鉴于此,对包括政策文件、政府举措和企业评估在内的文献进行了详细综述,并对二手数据进行了精心汇总和综合,以便于理解事实和未来路线图。为便于理解,还呈现了图表和编制的表格。

结果

本综述评估了印度在生物类似药领域的情况、印度投资战略、发展和创新方面需要改进的差距和领域,涉及对更熟练劳动力、产业合作和商业模式的需求。

结论

本综述还提出了一种方法,即赋予科技企业家权力,发展中小企业以进行大规模运营,以支持印度将创新理念推向全球层面,最终实现自力更生的印度。最后还强调了本综述的局限性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640b/9865573/2fb4ec320245/vaccines-11-00110-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640b/9865573/25959a1e631a/vaccines-11-00110-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640b/9865573/2fb4ec320245/vaccines-11-00110-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640b/9865573/25959a1e631a/vaccines-11-00110-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/640b/9865573/2fb4ec320245/vaccines-11-00110-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Indian Biosimilars and Vaccines at Crossroads-Replicating the Success of Pharmagenerics.处于十字路口的印度生物类似药与疫苗——复制仿制药的成功
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 2;11(1):110. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010110.
2
India's Potential as a Leader in Cancer Care Progress in the Future: A Synthetic Interdisciplinary Perspective.印度在癌症护理领域未来成为领导者的潜力:一个综合性跨学科视角
Cureus. 2024 Oct 5;16(10):e70892. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70892. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Human health implications of emerging diseases and the current situation in India's vaccine industry.新发疾病对人类健康的影响及印度疫苗行业现状
Sci One Health. 2023 Oct 29;2:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.soh.2023.100046. eCollection 2023.
6
Guidelines, editors, pharma and the biological paradigm shift.指南、编辑、制药行业与生物学范式转变
Mens Sana Monogr. 2007 Jan;5(1):27-30. doi: 10.4103/0973-1229.32176.
7
Biosimilars: A Comparative Study of Regulatory, Safety and Pharmacovigilance Monograph in the Developed and Developing Economies.生物类似药:发达国家和发展中国家监管、安全性和药物警戒专论比较研究。
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2022;25:149-182. doi: 10.18433/jpps32433.
8
Biosimilar drugs: Current status.生物类似药:现状
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2014 Jul;4(2):63-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.136774.
9
Biosimilars Use in Medicine for Inflammatory Diseases生物类似药在炎症性疾病医学中的应用
10
The economics of biosimilars.生物类似药的经济学
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2013 Sep;6(8):469-78.

引用本文的文献

1
: .: .
3 Biotech. 2025 Feb;15(2):46. doi: 10.1007/s13205-025-04215-7. Epub 2025 Jan 19.
2
Human health implications of emerging diseases and the current situation in India's vaccine industry.新发疾病对人类健康的影响及印度疫苗行业现状
Sci One Health. 2023 Oct 29;2:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.soh.2023.100046. eCollection 2023.
3
Biosimilars in the Era of Artificial Intelligence-International Regulations and the Use in Oncological Treatments.人工智能时代的生物类似药——国际法规及在肿瘤治疗中的应用

本文引用的文献

1
Emerging monkeypox cases amid the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic in the Indian subcontinent: A probable healthcare challenge for South East Asia.在印度次大陆持续的新冠疫情期间出现的猴痘病例:对东南亚可能构成的医疗保健挑战。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;10:1066425. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1066425. eCollection 2022.
2
Biosimilar ranibizumab interchangeability: what does it mean to retinal physicians?生物类似药雷珠单抗的可互换性:这对视网膜科医生意味着什么?
Eye (Lond). 2023 Jul;37(10):1953-1954. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02287-w. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
FDA Warning Letters: A Retrospective Analysis of Letters Issued to Pharmaceutical Companies from 2010-2020.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Jul 10;17(7):925. doi: 10.3390/ph17070925.
4
Unveiling the Biosimilar Paradox of Oncologists' Perceptions and Hesitations in South Korea: A Web-Based Survey Study.揭示韩国肿瘤学家对生物类似药认知和犹豫的悖论:一项基于网络的调查研究。
BioDrugs. 2024 Mar;38(2):301-311. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00640-3. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
5
Nanoadjuvants: Promising Bioinspired and Biomimetic Approaches in Vaccine Innovation.纳米佐剂:疫苗创新中具有前景的受生物启发和仿生方法
ACS Omega. 2023 Jul 24;8(31):27953-27968. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.3c02030. eCollection 2023 Aug 8.
美国食品药品监督管理局警示信:对2010年至2020年期间发给制药公司的警示信的回顾性分析
J Pharm Innov. 2022 Aug 15:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12247-022-09678-2.
4
Emerging novel sub-lineage BA.2.75: The next dominant omicron variant?新出现的BA.2.75亚谱系:下一个占主导地位的奥密克戎变体?
Int J Surg. 2022 Aug;104:106835. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106835. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
5
Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience.生物类似药的监管评估:基于科学证据和临床经验完善原则。
BioDrugs. 2022 May;36(3):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00533-x. Epub 2022 May 21.
6
Need of booster vaccine doses to counteract the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the context of the Omicron variant and increasing COVID-19 cases: An update.奥密克戎变异株流行背景下需要加强疫苗接种以应对 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的出现和 COVID-19 病例增加:更新。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(5):2065824. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2065824. Epub 2022 May 20.
7
SARS-CoV-2 and its variants of concern including Omicron: A never ending pandemic.SARS-CoV-2 及其关注变种,包括奥密克戎:一场永无止境的大流行。
Chem Biol Drug Des. 2022 May;99(5):769-788. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.14035. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
8
Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant of SARS-CoV-2: Concerns, challenges, and recent updates.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)奥密克戎(B.1.1.529)变体:关注、挑战及近期进展
J Med Virol. 2022 Jun;94(6):2336-2342. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27633. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
9
India led health innovation(s) for achieving the SDG health goal in the global South.印度引领了卫生创新,以在全球南方实现可持续发展目标中的卫生目标。
Perspect Public Health. 2022 Jan;142(1):20-21. doi: 10.1177/17579139211013404.
10
Biopharmaceutical Industry Capability Building in India: Report from a Symposium.印度生物制药产业能力建设:研讨会报告
J Pharm Innov. 2022;17(4):1555-1562. doi: 10.1007/s12247-021-09596-9. Epub 2021 Nov 26.