Panda Sunita, Singh Puneet Kumar, Mishra Snehasish, Mitra Sagnik, Pattnaik Priyabrata, Adhikary Sanjib Das, Mohapatra Ranjan K
School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India.
Department of Biosciences and Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Indore 453552, India.
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 2;11(1):110. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11010110.
The global pharma sector is fast shifting from generics to biologics and biosimilars with the first approval in Europe in 2006 followed by US approval in 2015. In the form of Hepatitis B vaccine, India saw its first recombinant biologics approval in 2000. Around 20% of generic medications and 62% of vaccines are now supplied by the Indian pharmaceutical industry. It is this good position in biologics and biosimilars production that could potentially improve healthcare via decreased treatment cost. India has witnessed large investments in biosimilars over the years. Numerous India-bred new players, e.g., Enzene Biosciences Ltd., are keen on biosimilars and have joined the race alongside the emerging giants, e.g., Biocon and Dr. Reddy's. A very positive sign was the remarkable disposition during the COVID-19 pandemic by Bharat Biotech and the Serum Institute of India. India's biopharmaceutical industry has been instrumental in producing and supplying preventives and therapeutics to fight COVID-19. Despite a weak supply chain and workforce pressure, the production was augmented to provide reasonably priced high-quality medications to more than 133 nations. Biosimilars could cost-effectively treat chronic diseases involving expensive conventional therapies, including diabetes, respiratory ailments, cancer, and connective tissue diseases. Biologics and biosimilars have been and are being tested to treat and manage COVID-19 symptoms characterized by inflammation and respiratory distress.
Although India boasts many universities, research centers, and a relatively skilled workforce, its global University-Industry collaboration ranking is 24, IPR ranking remains 47 and innovation ranking 39. This reveals a wide industry-academia gap to bridge. There are gaps in effective translational research in India that must be promptly and appropriately addressed. Innovation demands strong and effective collaborations among universities, techno-incubators, and industries.
Many successful research findings in academia do not get translation opportunities supposedly due to low industrial collaboration, low IP knowledge, and publication pressure with stringent timelines. In light of this, a detailed review of literature, including policy papers, government initiatives, and corporate reviews, was carried out, and the compilation and synthesis of the secondary data were meticulously summarized for the easy comprehension of the facts and roadmap ahead. For easy comprehension, charts, figures, and compiled tables are presented.
This review assesses India's situation in the biosimilar space, the gaps and areas to improve for Indian investment strategies, development, and innovation, addressing need for a more skilled workforce, industrial collaboration, and business models.
This review also proposes forward an approach to empowering technopreneurs to develop MSMEs for large-scale operations to support India in taking innovative thoughts to the global level to ultimately realize a self-reliant India. The limitations of the compilation are also highlighted towards the end.
全球制药行业正在迅速从仿制药转向生物制剂和生物类似药,2006年在欧洲首次获批,2015年在美国获批。以乙肝疫苗的形式,印度在2000年首次批准了重组生物制剂。目前,印度制药行业供应了约20%的仿制药和62%的疫苗。正是在生物制剂和生物类似药生产方面的这种良好地位,有可能通过降低治疗成本来改善医疗保健。多年来,印度在生物类似药方面见证了大量投资。众多印度本土的新参与者,如Enzene生物科学有限公司,热衷于生物类似药,并与新兴巨头,如百康和雷迪博士实验室,一起加入了竞争。一个非常积极的迹象是,在新冠疫情期间,巴拉特生物技术公司和印度血清研究所表现出色。印度的生物制药行业在生产和供应抗击新冠疫情的预防药物和治疗药物方面发挥了重要作用。尽管供应链薄弱且劳动力面临压力,但产量仍得以增加,为133多个国家提供了价格合理的高质量药物。生物类似药可以经济高效地治疗涉及昂贵传统疗法的慢性病,包括糖尿病、呼吸系统疾病、癌症和结缔组织疾病。生物制剂和生物类似药一直在并正在接受测试,以治疗和管理以炎症和呼吸窘迫为特征的新冠症状。
尽管印度拥有众多大学、研究中心和相对熟练的劳动力,但其全球产学研合作排名为第24位,知识产权排名仍为第47位,创新排名为第39位。这表明存在很大的产学研差距需要弥合。印度在有效的转化研究方面存在差距,必须迅速且适当地加以解决。创新需要大学、技术孵化器和产业之间强大而有效的合作。
学术界许多成功的研究成果没有得到转化机会,据推测是由于产业合作不足、知识产权知识匮乏以及严格时间限制下的发表压力。有鉴于此,对包括政策文件、政府举措和企业评估在内的文献进行了详细综述,并对二手数据进行了精心汇总和综合,以便于理解事实和未来路线图。为便于理解,还呈现了图表和编制的表格。
本综述评估了印度在生物类似药领域的情况、印度投资战略、发展和创新方面需要改进的差距和领域,涉及对更熟练劳动力、产业合作和商业模式的需求。
本综述还提出了一种方法,即赋予科技企业家权力,发展中小企业以进行大规模运营,以支持印度将创新理念推向全球层面,最终实现自力更生的印度。最后还强调了本综述的局限性。