Universidad Complutense de Madrid: Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology Department, School of Medicine, Pza. Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain; Forensic Medicine, Medico-Legal Institute of Madrid, C/ de Julio Cano Lasso, 4, 28042, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid: Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Pathology Department, School of Medicine, Pza. Ramón y Cajal, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain; Primary Care Medicine, C/ de Alonso Cano, 8, Móstoles, 28933 Madrid, Spain.
Forensic Sci Int. 2023 Feb;343:111568. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111568. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
The Death Certificate (DC) is an important medical-legal. However, despite its importance, the professionals involved are not well trained and consequently there exist many errors in completion. This situation can cause misclassification in mortality statistics, but also it means that many natural deaths end up being studied by the medical examiner, entailing a waste of resources. An analysis of 1974 DCs in Madrid is carried out to assess the quality of the completion, discover the main errors in the certificates and analyse possible improvement strategies. The study highlights that the demographic and personal information about the deceased is mostly correct; in 16,2 % of the cases the official document was not used; 91 % of the DCs in the sample have a certain degree of error (major or minor); and 38,4 % of the documents chain of causes were incorrect. The main measure proposed is increased training for certifiers, which should begin with activities at undergraduate level and continue later with periodic training workshops. In addition, we consider it essential to digitalise DCs in Spain. This would greatly facilitate completion. It is also proposed that medical examiners use, in Spain, a document similar to the official DC so that the statistics of violent and natural deaths which have required the medical examiners' intervention will improve.
死亡证明(DC)是一份重要的医学法律文件。然而,尽管它很重要,但相关专业人员的培训却不尽如人意,因此在填写过程中存在许多错误。这种情况可能导致死亡率统计数据的分类错误,也意味着许多自然死亡最终都由法医进行研究,浪费了资源。本研究对马德里 1974 份死亡证明进行了分析,以评估填写质量、发现证明中的主要错误,并分析可能的改进策略。研究结果表明,死者的人口统计学和个人信息大多是正确的;在 16.2%的情况下,未使用官方文件;样本中 91%的死亡证明存在一定程度的错误(主要或次要);38.4%的死亡证明因果链不正确。主要建议是增加认证人员的培训,培训应从本科阶段开始,并在以后定期举办培训研讨会。此外,我们认为在西班牙将死亡证明数字化至关重要。这将极大地简化填写过程。我们还建议西班牙的法医使用类似于官方死亡证明的文件,以提高需要法医干预的暴力和自然死亡的统计数据。